alphamoemoe/stock-analysis
Generate a comprehensive sentiment analysis report for a single stock. Use when users want deep analysis of a specific ticker like NVDA, TSLA, or AAPL.
Generate a comprehensive sentiment analysis report for a single stock. Use when users want deep analysis of a specific ticker like NVDA, TSLA, or AAPL.
npx skills add https://github.com/alphamoemoe/foci/tree/main/skills/stock-analysisGenerate a comprehensive sentiment analysis report for a single stock. Use when users want deep analysis of a specific ticker like NVDA, TSLA, or AAPL.
🤖 Convert GitHub repositories into Claude Skills automatically with AI, ensuring professional quality and comprehensive analysis in one click.
Codex skill and CLI for codebase complexity, security, architecture, dependency, and performance audits.
Build a RAG pipeline using natural language. Give your agent the skill to query complex vector stores through simple chat.
Claude Code skill that derives infrastructure architectures from workload analysis using first-principles math (Little's Law, Erlang-C, USL, availability calculus). 7-dimension constraint framework with swappable cloud/regulatory catalog.
When the user wants to conduct, analyze, or synthesize customer research. Use when the user mentions "customer research," "ICP research," "talk to customers," "analyze transcripts," "customer interviews," "survey analysis," "support ticket analysis," "voice of customer," "VOC," "build personas," "customer personas," "jobs to be done," "JTBD," "what do customers say," "what are customers struggling with," "Reddit mining," "G2 reviews," "review mining," "digital watering holes," "community research," "forum research," "competitor reviews," "customer sentiment," or "find out why customers churn/convert/buy." Use for both analyzing existing research assets AND gathering new research from online sources. For writing copy informed by research, see copywriting. For acting on research to improve pages, see cro.
a claude code skill that runs a council of models on your question. each member gets its own personality, they critique each other anonymously, and a chairman picks the best-argued answer (not a yes-man average). ported from karpathy/llm-council.