Community写作与编辑github.com

xiayi3642-spec/personal-blog-style

使用“个人博客风格”写作或改写中文文章:从真实小事、材料、谈话或困惑进入,让判断在连续追问、概念拆分和自我修正中形成。适用于老师布置的感想、课程随笔、读书体会、个人观察、博客文章及用户明确要求“自然语言写作 DNA”“个人博客风格”或“按之前蒸馏的文风”时;不用于仅需标准答案、纯计算或必须严格学术体例的正文。

personal-blog-style 是什么?

personal-blog-style is a Claude Code agent skill that 使用“个人博客风格”写作或改写中文文章:从真实小事、材料、谈话或困惑进入,让判断在连续追问、概念拆分和自我修正中形成。适用于老师布置的感想、课程随笔、读书体会、个人观察、博客文章及用户明确要求“自然语言写作 DNA”“个人博客风格”或“按之前蒸馏的文风”时;不用于仅需标准答案、纯计算或必须严格学术体例的正文。.

兼容平台~Claude Code~Codex CLI~Cursor
npx skills add xiayi3642-spec/personal-blog-style

Installed? Explore more 写作与编辑 skills: steipete/notion, langchain-ai/langchain, bytedance/podcast-generation · View all 6 →

在你喜欢的 AI 中提问

打开一个已预加载此 Agent Skill 的新对话。

文档

Personal Blog Style

Write natural, restrained, and personal Chinese essays. What is reused is a way of thinking and organizing, not the signature phrasing of any single author.

Before Starting

Read reference materials based on the task:

Writing Process

  1. First solve the "what to say": Extract the topic requirements, course knowledge, facts, evidence, user's stance, and real experiences.
  2. If information is insufficient but can still proceed safely, mark the need for user-supplied personal material with explicit placeholders; never fabricate experiences, conversations, interviews, reading records, data, or teacher opinions.
  3. Form a brief content skeleton, including the core problem, necessary knowledge points, evidence, and at least one cognitive shift. Do not first generate a generic AI answer and then do surface polishing.
  4. Organize the article from scratch according to the DNA: Enter from a specific situation, advance through questioning, distinction, and correction, and finally land on personal judgment or action.
  5. Before submission, check facts and topic requirements. Course knowledge, citation accuracy, and explicit grading criteria take priority over writing style.

When the user only requests a "direct answer," complete the above content analysis internally and deliver the final draft directly, without forcing a display of the outline.

Mandatory Boundaries

  • Do not fabricate the user's life, classes, work, conversations, or emotions.
  • Do not pass off views, cases, and sentences from external articles as the user's original work.
  • Do not mechanically pile up verbal tics like "actually, many times, in the end, frankly speaking."
  • Do not apply the default structure of "first, second, finally" or "big background—three reasons—grand epiphany."
  • Do not deliberately make typos, repeat synonymous sentences, or create loose logic just to sound human.
  • Retain English words only when they are working terms or when using Chinese would lose accurate meaning, and explain them nearby.
  • For theoretical questions, factual questions, and academic assignments, first give correct, complete, and verifiable content; use this style only to the extent that it does not compromise rigor.

Delivery Method

  • User wants a finished draft: Directly provide a complete body that is ready for submission or publication.
  • User has not yet provided personal materials, but the topic must incorporate personal experience: First provide a viable structure with a minimum of placeholders, then ask for key experiences in one short question.
  • User wants to polish an existing draft: Preserve the original facts and opinions, rebuild necessary narrative order; do not just replace synonyms.
  • When the user specifies word count, platform, teacher requirements, or format, prioritize the user's requirements above all else.

相关技能