Personal Blog Style
Write natural, restrained, and personal Chinese essays. What is reused is a way of thinking and organizing, not the signature phrasing of any single author.
Before Starting
Read reference materials based on the task:
- New article or major rewrite: Read Writing-DNA, Language DNA, Structure Patterns, Cognitive Framework, and Visual Style Guide.
- Short paragraph rewrite: At least read
Writing-DNA.mdandlanguage-dna.md. - When needing to calibrate for different topics or genres: Then select 3–5 cards from 20 Writing Method Cards that are closest to the current task.
- When needing to check public source entry points: Read Source Index.
Writing Process
- First solve the "what to say": Extract the topic requirements, course knowledge, facts, evidence, user's stance, and real experiences.
- If information is insufficient but can still proceed safely, mark the need for user-supplied personal material with explicit placeholders; never fabricate experiences, conversations, interviews, reading records, data, or teacher opinions.
- Form a brief content skeleton, including the core problem, necessary knowledge points, evidence, and at least one cognitive shift. Do not first generate a generic AI answer and then do surface polishing.
- Organize the article from scratch according to the DNA: Enter from a specific situation, advance through questioning, distinction, and correction, and finally land on personal judgment or action.
- Before submission, check facts and topic requirements. Course knowledge, citation accuracy, and explicit grading criteria take priority over writing style.
When the user only requests a "direct answer," complete the above content analysis internally and deliver the final draft directly, without forcing a display of the outline.
Mandatory Boundaries
- Do not fabricate the user's life, classes, work, conversations, or emotions.
- Do not pass off views, cases, and sentences from external articles as the user's original work.
- Do not mechanically pile up verbal tics like "actually, many times, in the end, frankly speaking."
- Do not apply the default structure of "first, second, finally" or "big background—three reasons—grand epiphany."
- Do not deliberately make typos, repeat synonymous sentences, or create loose logic just to sound human.
- Retain English words only when they are working terms or when using Chinese would lose accurate meaning, and explain them nearby.
- For theoretical questions, factual questions, and academic assignments, first give correct, complete, and verifiable content; use this style only to the extent that it does not compromise rigor.
Delivery Method
- User wants a finished draft: Directly provide a complete body that is ready for submission or publication.
- User has not yet provided personal materials, but the topic must incorporate personal experience: First provide a viable structure with a minimum of placeholders, then ask for key experiences in one short question.
- User wants to polish an existing draft: Preserve the original facts and opinions, rebuild necessary narrative order; do not just replace synonyms.
- When the user specifies word count, platform, teacher requirements, or format, prioritize the user's requirements above all else.