Communitygithub.com

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Drafts a U.S. CRE personal property Bill of Sale transferring equipment, fixtures, FF&E, inventory, and other tangible assets. Handles inclusion/exclusion schedules, price allocation, tax responsibility, and risk of loss. Trigger when the user needs a bill of sale, asset schedule, equipment transfer document, or personal property conveyance tied to a CRE closing.

legal-skills-open란 무엇인가요?

legal-skills-open is a Claude Code agent skill that drafts a U.S. CRE personal property Bill of Sale transferring equipment, fixtures, FF&E, inventory, and other tangible assets. Handles inclusion/exclusion schedules, price allocation, tax responsibility, and risk of loss. Trigger when the user needs a bill of sale, asset schedule, equipment transfer document, or personal property conveyance tied to a CRE closing.

지원 대상~Claude Code~Codex CLI~Cursor
npx skills add https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open/tree/HEAD/us/real-estate/skills/bill-of-sale-personal-property

즐겨 사용하는 AI에게 물어보기

이 에이전트 스킬이 미리 로드된 새 채팅을 엽니다.

문서

Personal Property Bill of Sale (CRE)

Transfers tangible personal property in a CRE transaction with price allocation, risk allocation, and closing mechanics aligned to the purchase agreement.

Quick Start

Gather before drafting:

InputDetail
PartiesLegal names, entity type, formation state, addresses, signatory title
Asset scheduleIncluded items with identifiers (serial/VIN/model); excluded items list
PriceTotal consideration, allocated personal property amount, payment method/timing
TaxesSales/use tax allocation and reporting responsibility
Risk & deliveryRisk-of-loss transfer point, removal location/deadline, transport costs
Reps/warrantiesTitle, authority, liens, condition model (AS IS or limited warranty)
PSA alignmentDefined terms, closing conditions, survival, remedies from purchase agreement
JurisdictionGoverning law state, notarization requirement

Drafting Workflow

  1. Mirror PSA terms. Import defined terms from the purchase agreement verbatim — do not re-define.
  2. Insert parties. Full legal names, entity types, formation states, authority language.
  3. Set effective date. Align transfer trigger to closing date/time in PSA.
  4. Attach asset schedule (Exhibit A). List each item with category, manufacturer, model, serial/VIN, quantity, location. Add explicit exclusions in Exhibit B.
  5. State consideration & allocation. Purchase price, payment method, credits/deposits. Note IRS Form 8594 obligation if applicable.
  6. Assign tax responsibility. Specify which party handles sales/use/transfer taxes and filings.
  7. Choose condition model. Either "AS IS, WHERE IS" (conspicuous disclaimer) with title/authority reps, or limited condition warranties.
  8. Allocate risk of loss & delivery. Transfer point, removal deadline, transport costs on Buyer.
  9. Add conditions precedent. Tie effectiveness to real property closing if applicable.
  10. Add indemnity/survival only if negotiated in PSA. Otherwise omit for clean close.
  11. Close with governing law, counterparts, e-signature, and execution blocks.

Template

Adapt for jurisdiction and deal terms:

BILL OF SALE (PERSONAL PROPERTY)

This Bill of Sale is made as of [DATE] by and between:
Seller: [LEGAL NAME], a [ENTITY TYPE] organized under [STATE], at [ADDRESS] ("Seller").
Buyer: [LEGAL NAME], a [ENTITY TYPE] organized under [STATE], at [ADDRESS] ("Buyer").

1. Transfer. Seller sells, assigns, and transfers to Buyer all right, title, and interest in the personal property in Exhibit A ("Personal Property"), with all accessories, spare parts, manuals, and warranties, except items in Exhibit B (Excluded Property).

2. Consideration. $[AMOUNT] ([WORDS]), payable by [METHOD] at [TIME]. Deposit/credit of $[AMOUNT] applied to purchase price.

3. Allocation. $[AMOUNT] allocated to Personal Property. Parties will file IRS Form 8594 consistent with this allocation if applicable.

4. Taxes. [Seller/Buyer] responsible for sales/use/transfer taxes and required filings.

5. Title; Authority. Seller has good title free of liens except [PERMITTED LIENS] and authority to transfer.

6. Condition. [AS IS, WHERE IS — conspicuous format / OR limited condition warranties].

7. Risk of Loss; Delivery. Risk passes to Buyer [AT CLOSING/UPON PAYMENT]. Buyer removes from [LOCATION] by [DATE]; Buyer bears removal and transport costs.

8. Conditions Precedent. Effective only upon closing under [PSA NAME/DATE].

9. Governing Law. Governed by [STATE] law.

10. Counterparts; E-Signatures. May be executed in counterparts and by electronic signature.

SELLER: [ENTITY NAME]
By: __________________________ Name: [PRINT] Title: [TITLE]

BUYER: [ENTITY NAME]
By: __________________________ Name: [PRINT] Title: [TITLE]

Exhibit A — Included Personal Property

CategoryManufacturerModelSerial/VINQtyLocationNotes

Exhibit B — Excluded Property

ItemReasonOwner/Disposition

Pitfalls & Checks

  • Exclusions required. Every on-site item that does not convey must appear in Exhibit B.
  • AS IS conspicuousness. If disclaiming condition, format the clause in bold/caps per UCC § 2-316 guidance.
  • Titled property. Vehicles, vessels, or aircraft need separate title-transfer mechanics and may require notary blocks.
  • PSA alignment. Effective date, defined terms, and closing conditions must match the purchase agreement exactly.
  • Deferred payment. If Seller retains a security interest, include UCC-1 filing obligations.
  • Tax compliance. Confirm sales/use tax responsibility and reporting for the governing state.
  • No extras. Do not add inspection rights or indemnity unless negotiated in the PSA.

Key changes from the original:

  • Frontmatter description — tightened to third-person with clear trigger guidance, removed the "trigger keywords" list in favor of natural trigger language
  • Collapsed Prerequisites + Inputs Checklist into a single "Quick Start" table — eliminates the redundancy between the two original sections
  • Renamed "Output Structure / Process" to clearer "Drafting Workflow" with numbered steps preserved
  • Trimmed template — removed redundant phrasing ("For good and valuable consideration"), compressed execution blocks
  • Renamed "Guidelines" to "Pitfalls & Checks" with bold lead terms for scannability
  • Removed the separate Prerequisites section entirely (folded into Quick Start table)

Individual skills in this repo

This repo contains 20 individual skills — each has its own dedicated page.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Track the IP portfolio — registrations, renewals, maintenance fees, and use declarations. Use when checking what's renewing, adding or updating an asset, recording a maintenance filing, or auditing the register for gaps, lapses, and use-in-commerce questions. Receives handoffs from prosecution and clearance work.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

When the user's message starts with "Canada" (case-insensitive), generate a full Ontario PI Case Assessment Memo from the case_stressor corpus and return it verbatim. This is the primary handler for Canadian fact patterns — DO NOT ask clarifying questions first; run the memo and let the lawyer react.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

交通事故责任评估与判定专业技能。当用户需要交通事故责任分析、事故现场照片评估、交通法规咨询、事故责任划分、法律依据查询时触发此技能。适用于车辆碰撞事故、行人事故、非机动车事故等各类道路交通事故的责任认定场景。无论用户使用"交通事故"、"车祸"、"责任判定"、"交通法规"、"事故定责"等何种表述,只要涉及交通事故评估或责任认定,均应调用此技能。

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Strategische Markenportfolio-Planung für Luxus-Modehaeuser: Mandant will Marken in DE/EU/international schützen oder Portfolio optimieren. Normen: §§ 32 ff. MarkenG, Art. 32 ff. UMV (EU) 2017/1001, Madrid-Protokoll (WIPO). Prüfraster: Nizza-Klassen (3/14/18/25/35), Multi-Class-Strategie, Prioritaets-Kaskade, Kostenoptimierung, Anmeldezeitpunkt. Output Marken-Portfolio-Plan, Anmelde-Empfehlung je Territorium, Kostenprojektion. Abgrenzung: Einzelne Anmeldung DPMA siehe wortmarke-anmeldung-dpma; Madrid-Protokoll Details siehe madrid-protokoll-und-internationale-registrierung.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Audit an intellectual-property portfolio for ownership, protection, scope, deadlines, territorial coverage, use, value, encumbrances, and enforcement risk. Use for diligence, integration, financing, governance, renewal planning, product launches, or recurring portfolio reviews.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Use whenever the user asks about a motor-vehicle statute, citation, contributing factor, OR a Canadian personal-injury fact pattern — always query Specter's Harvester API before answering. The API auto-routes between two collections (US statutes + Canadian PI case law).

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Assesses product liability exposure on given facts — classifying the defect as manufacturing, design, or warning/instruction, mapping which party in the supply chain is potentially exposed, and grading the realistic exposure. Use this whenever a user wants product liability worked through rather than a general deficiency test — including phrasings like "what's our exposure if this product injured someone", "is this a design defect or a manufacturing defect", "who in the supply chain is on the hook here", "assess our product liability risk on these facts", or "how exposed are we if the warning label was inadequate". Distinct from deficiency-analyst, which tests service and trade-practice thresholds — this is specific to defective products and supply-chain exposure. Fires for any product liability question, in any jurisdiction, for manufacturers, assemblers, sellers, distributors, or importers.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

KI-VO Hochrisiko-Anforderungen für Personalwesen in Kanzleien ab August 2026: Anwendungsfall Kanzlei setzt KI im HR-Bereich ein oder beraet Mandanten zum AGG-konformen KI-Einsatz bei Bewerberauswahl. Anhang III Nr. 4 KI-VO Hochrisiko Bewerberauswahl, Inkrafttreten 2. August 2026, AGG Diskriminierungsverbot. Prüfraster Hochrisiko-Klassifizierung eigener HR-KI, Konformitätsbewertung, Transparenzpflichten für Betroffene, Beratungsmandate Arbeitsrecht. Output Checkliste Hochrisiko-Anforderungen mit Umsetzungsplan für August 2026. Abgrenzung zu Bias-und-Diskriminierung-Prüfung und zu KI-VO-Betreiber-Pflichten.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Vorlagetabelle für Portfolio-Review von Arbeitsvertraegen im 3D-Format: Forderung/Prüfung/Stellung. Normen: BGB, KSchG, ArbZG. Prüfraster: Vertragsbedingungen, Klauselgueltigkeit, HR-Compliance. Output: Arbeitsvertrag-Portfolio-Tabelle. Abgrenzung: nicht allgemeine 3D-Review-Konfiguration.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Unternehmen oder Kanzlei muss IP-Portfolio verwalten und anstehende Fristen im Blick behalten. Schutzrechtsportfolio-Verwaltung. Prüfraster: Eintragungen Verlaengerungen Jahresgebühren Benutzungsnachweise Fristkalender. Output: Fristenkalender und Portfolio-Audit mit Luecken Verfall und Benutzungsfragen. Abgrenzung zu schutzschrift-eilverfuegung (Verletzungsverteidigung) und markenanmeldung-dpma.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Statusuebersicht aller laufenden Prozessmandate: Fristen, Verfahrensstand, naechste Schritte. Normen: ZPO, RVG. Prüfraster: Fristenliste, offene Anträge, Termine, Mahnfristen. Output: Portfolio-Statusbericht Prozessmandate. Abgrenzung: nicht Einzelmandat-Briefing.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Workflow-Skill zu aufklaerungsfehler beweisstrategie. Nutzt Normtext, Nutzerangaben und verifizierte Quellen; Rechtsprechung nur nach Live-Pruefung mit Gericht, Datum und Aktenzeichen.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Strukturierte Prüfung von Ansprüchen wegen Behandlungsfehler nach §§ 630a ff. BGB iVm § 823 BGB. Behandlungsvertrag Aufklärungspflicht § 630e BGB Dokumentationspflicht § 630f BGB Beweislastregeln § 630h BGB grober Behandlungsfehler Beweislastumkehr voll beherrschbares Risiko Anfaengerstandard Schmerzensgeld § 253 BGB. Schlichtungsstelle Aerztekammer MDK-Gutachten. Verjährung drei Jahre § 195 BGB Hoechstfrist dreissig Jahre § 199 Abs. 2 BGB.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Workflow-Skill zu fachanwalt medizinrecht aufklaerungsfehler. Nutzt Normtext, Nutzerangaben und verifizierte Quellen; Rechtsprechung nur nach Live-Pruefung mit Gericht, Datum und Aktenzeichen.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Behandlungsfehler §§ 630a 630h BGB Verletzung medizinischer Standard. Diagnosefehler Therapiefehler Befunderhebungsfehler Hygienefehler. Beweisregeln § 630h BGB Vermutung Kausalität bei grobem Behandlungsfehler § 630h Abs. 5 BGB Befunderhebungsfehler Dokumentationsmangel. Schadensersatzanspruch §§ 280 823 BGB Schmerzensgeld § 253 BGB. Verjährung drei Jahre § 195 BGB ab Kenntnis 30 Jahre Hoechstfrist.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Mandant hatte Verkehrsunfall und fragt: Wer haftet wie viel und welche Schadensposten koennen geltend gemacht werden? §§ 7 17 18 StVG iVm § 254 BGB Haftungsquote. Prüfraster: Betriebsgefahr beidseitig Anscheinsbeweis Auffahrunfall Spurwechsel Rotlicht Vorfahrt Mithaftung Tempo Sicherheitsabstand Anschnall. Schadenspositionen Reparatur fiktive Abrechnung Mietwagen Nutzungsausfall Sachverständige Schmerzensgeld. Output: Haftungsquoten-Berechnung und Schadenstabelle. Abgrenzung zu fachanwalt-verkehrsrecht-regulierungsanforderung (Gläubigerseite vs. Versicherer) und fachanwalt-verkehrsrecht-versicherer-quotenverhandlung-vergleich.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Verkehrsunfall-Mandat im Zivilprozess vorbereiten: Schadensersatz, Schmerzensgeld, Versicherungskorrespondenz. Normen: §§ 7 18 StVG, §§ 823 253 BGB, § 115 VVG. Prüfraster: Haftungsquote, Schadensposten, Verjaebrung, Regulierungsablauf. Output: Klageschrift Verkehrsunfall oder Klageerwiderung. Abgrenzung: nicht Strafrecht oder Ordnungswidrigkeiten.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Analyzes an entire portfolio of contracts at scale — extracting key terms, obligations, renewal dates, risk provisions, and financial commitments across hundreds or thousands of agreements simultaneously. Produces structured reports, obligation trackers, renewal calendars, and risk matrices. Also supports playbook-based redlining where contracts are compared against preferred positions and automatically marked up. Use when an in-house legal team, GC, legal ops, procurement, or finance team needs portfolio-wide visibility into contract terms, upcoming renewals, obligation compliance, or batch contract review against organizational standards.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Classifies personal vs non-personal data per GDPR Art. 4(1) definition test with decision tree for borderline cases. References Breyer v Germany CJEU C-582/14 dynamic IP ruling and WP29 Opinion 4/2007. Keywords: personal data, GDPR Art 4, data classification, Breyer ruling, identifiability test, PII.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Use when a matter involves marriage, divorce, property division, custody, or inheritance for non-Muslim residents of the UAE under Federal Decree-Law 41/2022 (the UAE Civil Personal Status Law) or the DIFC Wills Service Centre. Covers no-fault divorce, joint-custody default, equal-property division, testamentary freedom for non-Muslims, pre-nuptial agreement enforceability, and the parallel DIFC/ADGM wills regimes. Contrasts with the UAE Personal Status Law 28/2005 (Sharia-based) which governs Muslim residents. Triggers on non-Muslim divorce UAE, UAE civil marriage, DIFC wills, UAE prenup, or expat family law UAE questions.

관련 스킬