Communitygithub.com

auditing-terraform-infrastructure-for-security

Auditing Terraform infrastructure-as-code for security misconfigurations

auditing-terraform-infrastructure-for-security とは?

auditing-terraform-infrastructure-for-security is a Claude Code agent skill that auditing Terraform infrastructure-as-code for security misconfigurations.

対応~Claude Code~Codex CLI~Cursor
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/tree/main/skills/auditing-terraform-infrastructure-for-security

お気に入りのAIに質問する

このエージェントスキルを事前に読み込んだ状態で新しいチャットを開きます。

ドキュメント

Auditing Terraform Infrastructure for Security

When to Use

  • When integrating security scanning into CI/CD pipelines for Terraform deployments
  • When reviewing Terraform plans and modules for security best practices before applying
  • When building policy-as-code guardrails for cloud infrastructure provisioning
  • When auditing existing Terraform state files to identify deployed misconfigurations
  • When enforcing organizational security standards across multiple Terraform projects

Do not use for runtime security monitoring (use CSPM tools), for application security testing (use SAST/DAST tools), or for cloud configuration drift detection (use AWS Config or Azure Policy after deployment).

Prerequisites

  • Checkov installed (pip install checkov)
  • tfsec installed (brew install tfsec or binary from GitHub)
  • Terrascan installed (brew install terrascan)
  • Terraform v1.0+ for plan generation
  • OPA (Open Policy Agent) for custom policy enforcement
  • Git repository with Terraform code to audit

Workflow

Step 1: Scan Terraform Code with Checkov

Run Checkov for comprehensive IaC security scanning with built-in and custom policies.

# Scan a Terraform directory
checkov -d ./terraform/ --framework terraform

# Scan with specific check categories
checkov -d ./terraform/ --check CKV_AWS_18,CKV_AWS_19,CKV_AWS_20,CKV_AWS_21

# Scan and output results in JSON
checkov -d ./terraform/ --output json > checkov-results.json

# Scan a Terraform plan file for more accurate analysis
terraform init && terraform plan -out=tfplan
terraform show -json tfplan > tfplan.json
checkov -f tfplan.json --framework terraform_plan

# Skip specific checks with justification
checkov -d ./terraform/ --skip-check CKV_AWS_145 \
  --bc-api-key $BRIDGECREW_API_KEY

# Scan Terraform modules
checkov -d ./modules/ --framework terraform --compact

# List all available checks
checkov --list --framework terraform | grep CKV_AWS

Step 2: Scan with tfsec for Terraform-Specific Issues

Use tfsec for Terraform-native security analysis with detailed remediation guidance.

# Scan a Terraform directory
tfsec ./terraform/

# Scan with minimum severity threshold
tfsec ./terraform/ --minimum-severity HIGH

# Output in JSON for CI/CD processing
tfsec ./terraform/ --format json > tfsec-results.json

# Scan with custom checks
tfsec ./terraform/ --custom-check-dir ./custom-checks/

# Exclude specific rules
tfsec ./terraform/ --exclude-downloaded-modules \
  --exclude aws-s3-enable-bucket-logging

# Scan and fail on specific severity
tfsec ./terraform/ --minimum-severity CRITICAL --soft-fail

# Generate SARIF output for GitHub Security tab
tfsec ./terraform/ --format sarif > tfsec.sarif

Step 3: Run Terrascan for Multi-Framework Compliance

Execute Terrascan for compliance checking against CIS, NIST, and SOC 2 frameworks.

# Scan Terraform against CIS AWS benchmark
terrascan scan -t aws -i terraform -d ./terraform/ \
  --policy-type aws --verbose

# Scan against specific compliance frameworks
terrascan scan -t aws -i terraform -d ./terraform/ \
  --policy-type aws \
  --categories "Compliance Validation"

# Output in JSON
terrascan scan -t aws -i terraform -d ./terraform/ \
  --output json > terrascan-results.json

# Scan a Terraform plan
terrascan scan -t aws -i terraform \
  --iac-file tfplan.json \
  --iac-type tfplan

# List available policies
terrascan scan --list-policies -t aws

Step 4: Create Custom OPA Policies for Organization Standards

Write Rego policies for organization-specific security requirements.

# policy/aws_s3_encryption.rego
package terraform.aws.s3

deny[msg] {
    resource := input.resource.aws_s3_bucket[name]
    not resource.server_side_encryption_configuration
    msg := sprintf("S3 bucket '%s' must have server-side encryption enabled", [name])
}

# policy/aws_iam_no_wildcards.rego
package terraform.aws.iam

deny[msg] {
    resource := input.resource.aws_iam_policy[name]
    statement := resource.policy.Statement[_]
    statement.Action == "*"
    statement.Effect == "Allow"
    msg := sprintf("IAM policy '%s' must not use wildcard (*) actions", [name])
}

deny[msg] {
    resource := input.resource.aws_iam_policy[name]
    statement := resource.policy.Statement[_]
    statement.Resource == "*"
    statement.Effect == "Allow"
    contains(statement.Action[_], "*")
    msg := sprintf("IAM policy '%s' has overly permissive actions on wildcard resources", [name])
}

# policy/aws_no_public_ingress.rego
package terraform.aws.security_group

deny[msg] {
    resource := input.resource.aws_security_group_rule[name]
    resource.type == "ingress"
    resource.cidr_blocks[_] == "0.0.0.0/0"
    resource.from_port <= 22
    resource.to_port >= 22
    msg := sprintf("Security group rule '%s' allows SSH from 0.0.0.0/0", [name])
}
# Evaluate Terraform plan against OPA policies
terraform show -json tfplan | opa eval \
  --data ./policy/ \
  --input /dev/stdin \
  "data.terraform.aws" \
  --format pretty

# Run Conftest for easier OPA policy testing
conftest test tfplan.json --policy ./policy/ --output json

Step 5: Integrate Security Scanning into CI/CD Pipeline

Add IaC security scanning as a mandatory CI/CD gate.

# GitHub Actions: Terraform security pipeline
name: Terraform Security Scan
on:
  pull_request:
    paths: ['terraform/**']

jobs:
  security-scan:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v4

      - name: Setup Terraform
        uses: hashicorp/setup-terraform@v3

      - name: Terraform Init & Plan
        run: |
          cd terraform/
          terraform init
          terraform plan -out=tfplan
          terraform show -json tfplan > tfplan.json

      - name: Checkov Scan
        uses: bridgecrewio/checkov-action@master
        with:
          directory: terraform/
          framework: terraform
          output_format: sarif
          output_file_path: checkov.sarif
          soft_fail: false

      - name: tfsec Scan
        uses: aquasecurity/[email protected]
        with:
          working_directory: terraform/
          soft_fail: false

      - name: Upload SARIF
        uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v2
        with:
          sarif_file: checkov.sarif

      - name: OPA Policy Check
        run: |
          conftest test terraform/tfplan.json \
            --policy ./policy/ \
            --output json

Step 6: Scan Terraform State for Deployed Misconfigurations

Audit the current Terraform state to identify already-deployed security issues.

# Export current state as JSON
terraform show -json > terraform-state.json

# Scan the state with Checkov
checkov -f terraform-state.json --framework terraform_plan

# Query state for specific security issues
terraform state list | while read resource; do
  terraform state show "$resource" 2>/dev/null | grep -i "public\|0.0.0.0\|encrypt.*false\|password"
done

# Find resources without required tags
terraform state list | grep aws_instance | while read resource; do
  tags=$(terraform state show "$resource" | grep -A20 "tags")
  if ! echo "$tags" | grep -q "Environment"; then
    echo "MISSING TAG: $resource lacks 'Environment' tag"
  fi
done

Key Concepts

TermDefinition
Infrastructure as CodePractice of managing cloud infrastructure through declarative configuration files (Terraform, CloudFormation) rather than manual console operations
Policy as CodeExpressing security and compliance policies as executable code (Rego, Python) that can be automatically evaluated against infrastructure definitions
Shift Left SecurityMoving security checks earlier in the development lifecycle by scanning IaC before deployment rather than auditing after provisioning
Terraform PlanPreview of changes Terraform will make, which can be exported as JSON for security scanning before applying changes
CheckovOpen-source static analysis tool for IaC supporting Terraform, CloudFormation, Kubernetes, and Docker with 1000+ built-in policies
OPA/RegoOpen Policy Agent and its policy language Rego for defining custom security rules that evaluate against structured data inputs

Tools & Systems

  • Checkov: Comprehensive IaC scanner with 1000+ policies for Terraform, CloudFormation, Kubernetes, ARM, and Dockerfile
  • tfsec: Terraform-specific static analysis tool with detailed remediation guidance and SARIF output
  • Terrascan: Multi-IaC scanner supporting compliance frameworks (CIS, NIST, SOC 2) with policy-as-code
  • OPA/Conftest: Custom policy engine for defining organization-specific security rules using Rego language
  • Bridgecrew: Commercial platform built on Checkov providing drift detection and supply chain security

Common Scenarios

Scenario: Adding Security Gates to an Existing Terraform CI/CD Pipeline

Context: A DevOps team deploys infrastructure via Terraform in GitHub Actions but has no security scanning. Recent audit findings show multiple S3 buckets without encryption and security groups allowing SSH from the internet.

Approach:

  1. Add Checkov as the first security gate in the GitHub Actions workflow
  2. Run checkov -d ./terraform/ to establish the current baseline of findings
  3. Triage existing findings: fix CRITICAL issues, create tickets for HIGH, suppress accepted risks
  4. Add tfsec as a secondary scanner for Terraform-specific checks
  5. Write custom OPA policies for organization standards (required tags, naming conventions)
  6. Configure the pipeline to block PRs with CRITICAL or HIGH findings
  7. Generate SARIF reports for GitHub Security tab integration

Pitfalls: Adding security scanning to an existing project will initially produce hundreds of findings. Implement gradually by starting with CRITICAL-only blocking, then expanding to HIGH. Use inline suppression comments (#checkov:skip=CKV_AWS_18:Public bucket for static website) for intentional exceptions with documented justification.

Output Format

Terraform Security Audit Report
==================================
Repository: acme-corp/infrastructure
Branch: main
Scan Date: 2026-02-23
Tools: Checkov 3.x, tfsec 1.x, OPA custom policies

SCAN RESULTS:
  Checkov checks passed:    187
  Checkov checks failed:     34
  tfsec checks passed:      156
  tfsec checks failed:       28
  OPA custom policies:       12 passed, 3 failed

CRITICAL FINDINGS:
[TF-001] S3 Bucket Without Encryption
  File: modules/storage/main.tf:24
  Resource: aws_s3_bucket.data_lake
  Check: CKV_AWS_19
  Fix: Add server_side_encryption_configuration block

[TF-002] Security Group Allows SSH from 0.0.0.0/0
  File: modules/network/security.tf:45
  Resource: aws_security_group_rule.ssh_access
  Check: CKV_AWS_24
  Fix: Restrict cidr_blocks to bastion subnet

[TF-003] IAM Policy with Wildcard Actions
  File: modules/iam/policies.tf:12
  Resource: aws_iam_policy.developer_policy
  Check: CKV_AWS_1
  Fix: Scope actions to specific services required

SUMMARY BY SEVERITY:
  Critical:  6 findings
  High:     14 findings
  Medium:   28 findings
  Low:      18 findings
  Info:     12 findings

Individual skills in this repo

This repo contains 20 individual skills — each has its own dedicated page.

abusing-dpapi-for-credential-access

Extract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket

abusing-shadow-credentials-for-privesc

Take over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target

achieving-cmmc-level-2-compliance

>-

acquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcfldd

Create forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.

analyzing-active-directory-acl-abuse

Detect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3

analyzing-android-malware-with-apktool

Perform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.

analyzing-api-gateway-access-logs

Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect

analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator

Query ATT&CK data with attackcti, mitreattack-python, and stix2, then build MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers and multi-layer heatmap overlays mapping one or more APT groups

analyzing-azure-activity-logs-for-threats

Queries Azure Monitor activity logs and sign-in logs via azure-monitor-query

analyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples

Analyzes bootkit and advanced rootkit malware infecting the Master

analyzing-browser-forensics-with-hindsight

Parse Chromium-based browser databases with Hindsight to extract and correlate browsing history, downloads, cookies, cached content, autofill data, saved passwords, and extensions from Chrome, Edge, Brave, Opera, and Vivaldi into a unified timeline (XLSX, JSON, or SQLite output). Use during incident response, insider-threat investigations, or criminal cases when you need to reconstruct a user

analyzing-campaign-attribution-evidence

Systematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attribution assessments. Use when an incident investigation needs a defensible attribution confidence level.

analyzing-certificate-transparency-for-phishing

Monitor Certificate Transparency logs using crt.sh and Certstream to

analyzing-cloud-storage-access-patterns

Detect abnormal access in AWS S3, GCS, and Azure Blob Storage by analyzing CloudTrail Data Events, GCS audit logs, and Azure Storage Analytics for after-hours bulk downloads, new-IP access, and API-call spikes (e.g. GetObject) via statistical baselines and time-series anomaly detection. Use when investigating suspected cloud data exfiltration or building related detection rules.

analyzing-cobalt-strike-beacon-configuration

Extract and analyze Cobalt Strike beacon configuration from PE files

analyzing-cobaltstrike-malleable-c2-profiles

Parse and analyze Cobalt Strike Malleable C2 profiles with dissect.cobaltstrike (profiles and beacon-payload configs) and pyMalleableC2 (AST parsing) to extract HTTP/DNS transforms, URIs, headers, sleep/jitter, and injection behavior, then generate network detection signatures. Use when reverse-engineering a captured malleable profile or building detections against Cobalt Strike Beacon traffic.

analyzing-command-and-control-communication

Analyzes malware C2 communication over HTTP, HTTPS, DNS, and custom

analyzing-cyber-kill-chain

Analyzes intrusion activity against the Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain

analyzing-disk-image-with-autopsy

Perform comprehensive forensic analysis of raw (dd), E01, or AFF disk images with Autopsy and The Sleuth Kit, recovering deleted files, examining metadata and embedded artifacts, keyword searching, and building investigation timelines with visual reports. Use for structured analysis of a forensic disk image or when stakeholders need visual reports from evidence.

analyzing-dns-logs-for-exfiltration

Analyzes DNS query logs to detect data exfiltration via DNS tunneling,

関連スキル