Communitygithub.com

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Drafts spoliation and evidence preservation demand letters for personal injury litigation. Generates case-specific evidence itemization, litigation hold demands, compliance deadlines, and sanctions warnings. Use when sending preservation demands, litigation hold notices, or spoliation letters in pre-suit or early discovery phases.

Qu'est-ce que legal-skills-open ?

legal-skills-open is a Claude Code agent skill that drafts spoliation and evidence preservation demand letters for personal injury litigation. Generates case-specific evidence itemization, litigation hold demands, compliance deadlines, and sanctions warnings. Use when sending preservation demands, litigation hold notices, or spoliation letters in pre-suit or early discovery phases.

Compatible avec~Claude Code~Codex CLI~Cursor
npx skills add https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open/tree/HEAD/us/personal-injury/skills/spoliation-letter

Demander à votre IA préférée

Ouvre une nouvelle conversation avec cette compétence d'agent déjà préchargée.

Documentation

Spoliation Letter (Evidence Preservation Demand)

Generates a formal letter establishing the opposing party's duty to preserve evidence and creating a record to support future sanctions motions.

Prerequisites

Gather before drafting:

  • Parties — full legal names, addresses, counsel if known
  • Incident — date, location, nature of incident and injuries
  • Known evidence — specific items already identified (cameras, vehicles, products, records)
  • Case type — premises liability, motor vehicle, product liability, medical malpractice, or other PI subcategory
  • Jurisdiction — for state-specific spoliation standards

Quick Start

  1. Collect party and incident details from intake documents
  2. Identify case type to select evidence categories
  3. Draft letter following the required sections below
  4. Tailor evidence itemization with case-specific items from uploaded documents
  5. Send via certified mail (return receipt requested); concurrent email if address known

Required Letter Sections

1. Opening — Representation & Notice

  • Identify attorney/firm and client
  • State date, location, and general nature of incident
  • Do NOT disclose work product or litigation strategy

2. Legal Duty to Preserve

  • Demand preservation of all relevant evidence
  • State duty attaches once litigation is reasonably anticipated
  • Require immediate suspension of routine destruction/retention policies
  • Require litigation hold across all custodians

3. Evidence Itemization (Case-Type Specific)

Select and tailor from applicable categories:

Case TypeKey Categories
Premises liabilitySurveillance footage (camera locations + time window), incident reports, maintenance/inspection logs, prior complaints, repair records, photographs, safety policies
Motor vehicleEDR/black box data, dashcam footage, vehicle maintenance records, driver logs/hours-of-service, employment/training records, cell phone records, GPS data
Product liabilitySubject product and exemplars, design specs, testing/QA records, prior complaints/recalls, modification history, marketing materials, regulatory submissions
All casesEmails, texts, instant messages, social media, internal communications, photos/video, insurance files, personnel/training files, policies and procedures, financial records

Always append catch-all: "any other documents, data, or tangible items potentially relevant to [Client]'s claims."

4. Electronic Evidence Specifics

  • Demand preservation of metadata, backup tapes, cloud storage, archived data
  • Name specific systems/platforms if known
  • Require preservation in native format

5. Consequences of Non-Compliance

State spoliation may result in:

  • Adverse inference jury instructions
  • Issue/fact preclusion
  • Monetary sanctions
  • Dismissal of defenses or default judgment
  • Independent tort liability for spoliation
  • Punitive damages exposure

6. Compliance Demand

  • Written confirmation within 10 business days
  • Must identify: (a) preservation steps taken, (b) custodians responsible, (c) scope of litigation hold

7. Closing & Signature Block

  • Attorney name, firm, address, phone, email, bar number

Letter Template

[DATE]

Via Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested
[Also via email: ___]

[RECIPIENT NAME]
[TITLE]
[COMPANY/ENTITY]
[ADDRESS]

Re: Preservation of Evidence — [CLIENT NAME] v. [ADVERSE PARTY]
    Date of Incident: [DATE]
    Location: [LOCATION]

Dear [RECIPIENT]:

[OPENING — representation, incident identification]

[LEGAL DUTY — preservation obligation, litigation hold demand]

[EVIDENCE LIST — case-specific itemization]

[ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE — ESI-specific demands]

[CONSEQUENCES — sanctions warning]

[COMPLIANCE DEADLINE — 10 business days, written confirmation]

[CLOSING]

Respectfully,

[ATTORNEY NAME]
[FIRM NAME]
[ADDRESS]
[PHONE] | [EMAIL]
[BAR NUMBER]

Pitfalls and Checks

  • No work product disclosure — never reveal legal theories, damage calculations, or strategy
  • Jurisdiction matters — spoliation standards vary by state (independent tort vs. sanctions only); flag state-specific requirements [VERIFY when drafting]
  • Specificity drives sanctions — supplement generic categories with case-specific items from uploaded documents; broad enough for coverage, specific enough for clear notice
  • Tone — professional and firm, not adversarial or threatening
  • Timing — send as early as possible; delay weakens sanctions arguments
  • Multiple custodians — if evidence is held by multiple entities (e.g., property owner + management company + insurer), send separate letters to each
  • Proof of service — always use certified mail with return receipt; concurrent email recommended

Individual skills in this repo

This repo contains 20 individual skills — each has its own dedicated page.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Track the IP portfolio — registrations, renewals, maintenance fees, and use declarations. Use when checking what's renewing, adding or updating an asset, recording a maintenance filing, or auditing the register for gaps, lapses, and use-in-commerce questions. Receives handoffs from prosecution and clearance work.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

When the user's message starts with "Canada" (case-insensitive), generate a full Ontario PI Case Assessment Memo from the case_stressor corpus and return it verbatim. This is the primary handler for Canadian fact patterns — DO NOT ask clarifying questions first; run the memo and let the lawyer react.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

交通事故责任评估与判定专业技能。当用户需要交通事故责任分析、事故现场照片评估、交通法规咨询、事故责任划分、法律依据查询时触发此技能。适用于车辆碰撞事故、行人事故、非机动车事故等各类道路交通事故的责任认定场景。无论用户使用"交通事故"、"车祸"、"责任判定"、"交通法规"、"事故定责"等何种表述,只要涉及交通事故评估或责任认定,均应调用此技能。

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Strategische Markenportfolio-Planung für Luxus-Modehaeuser: Mandant will Marken in DE/EU/international schützen oder Portfolio optimieren. Normen: §§ 32 ff. MarkenG, Art. 32 ff. UMV (EU) 2017/1001, Madrid-Protokoll (WIPO). Prüfraster: Nizza-Klassen (3/14/18/25/35), Multi-Class-Strategie, Prioritaets-Kaskade, Kostenoptimierung, Anmeldezeitpunkt. Output Marken-Portfolio-Plan, Anmelde-Empfehlung je Territorium, Kostenprojektion. Abgrenzung: Einzelne Anmeldung DPMA siehe wortmarke-anmeldung-dpma; Madrid-Protokoll Details siehe madrid-protokoll-und-internationale-registrierung.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Audit an intellectual-property portfolio for ownership, protection, scope, deadlines, territorial coverage, use, value, encumbrances, and enforcement risk. Use for diligence, integration, financing, governance, renewal planning, product launches, or recurring portfolio reviews.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Use whenever the user asks about a motor-vehicle statute, citation, contributing factor, OR a Canadian personal-injury fact pattern — always query Specter's Harvester API before answering. The API auto-routes between two collections (US statutes + Canadian PI case law).

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Assesses product liability exposure on given facts — classifying the defect as manufacturing, design, or warning/instruction, mapping which party in the supply chain is potentially exposed, and grading the realistic exposure. Use this whenever a user wants product liability worked through rather than a general deficiency test — including phrasings like "what's our exposure if this product injured someone", "is this a design defect or a manufacturing defect", "who in the supply chain is on the hook here", "assess our product liability risk on these facts", or "how exposed are we if the warning label was inadequate". Distinct from deficiency-analyst, which tests service and trade-practice thresholds — this is specific to defective products and supply-chain exposure. Fires for any product liability question, in any jurisdiction, for manufacturers, assemblers, sellers, distributors, or importers.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

KI-VO Hochrisiko-Anforderungen für Personalwesen in Kanzleien ab August 2026: Anwendungsfall Kanzlei setzt KI im HR-Bereich ein oder beraet Mandanten zum AGG-konformen KI-Einsatz bei Bewerberauswahl. Anhang III Nr. 4 KI-VO Hochrisiko Bewerberauswahl, Inkrafttreten 2. August 2026, AGG Diskriminierungsverbot. Prüfraster Hochrisiko-Klassifizierung eigener HR-KI, Konformitätsbewertung, Transparenzpflichten für Betroffene, Beratungsmandate Arbeitsrecht. Output Checkliste Hochrisiko-Anforderungen mit Umsetzungsplan für August 2026. Abgrenzung zu Bias-und-Diskriminierung-Prüfung und zu KI-VO-Betreiber-Pflichten.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Vorlagetabelle für Portfolio-Review von Arbeitsvertraegen im 3D-Format: Forderung/Prüfung/Stellung. Normen: BGB, KSchG, ArbZG. Prüfraster: Vertragsbedingungen, Klauselgueltigkeit, HR-Compliance. Output: Arbeitsvertrag-Portfolio-Tabelle. Abgrenzung: nicht allgemeine 3D-Review-Konfiguration.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Unternehmen oder Kanzlei muss IP-Portfolio verwalten und anstehende Fristen im Blick behalten. Schutzrechtsportfolio-Verwaltung. Prüfraster: Eintragungen Verlaengerungen Jahresgebühren Benutzungsnachweise Fristkalender. Output: Fristenkalender und Portfolio-Audit mit Luecken Verfall und Benutzungsfragen. Abgrenzung zu schutzschrift-eilverfuegung (Verletzungsverteidigung) und markenanmeldung-dpma.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Statusuebersicht aller laufenden Prozessmandate: Fristen, Verfahrensstand, naechste Schritte. Normen: ZPO, RVG. Prüfraster: Fristenliste, offene Anträge, Termine, Mahnfristen. Output: Portfolio-Statusbericht Prozessmandate. Abgrenzung: nicht Einzelmandat-Briefing.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Workflow-Skill zu aufklaerungsfehler beweisstrategie. Nutzt Normtext, Nutzerangaben und verifizierte Quellen; Rechtsprechung nur nach Live-Pruefung mit Gericht, Datum und Aktenzeichen.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Strukturierte Prüfung von Ansprüchen wegen Behandlungsfehler nach §§ 630a ff. BGB iVm § 823 BGB. Behandlungsvertrag Aufklärungspflicht § 630e BGB Dokumentationspflicht § 630f BGB Beweislastregeln § 630h BGB grober Behandlungsfehler Beweislastumkehr voll beherrschbares Risiko Anfaengerstandard Schmerzensgeld § 253 BGB. Schlichtungsstelle Aerztekammer MDK-Gutachten. Verjährung drei Jahre § 195 BGB Hoechstfrist dreissig Jahre § 199 Abs. 2 BGB.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Workflow-Skill zu fachanwalt medizinrecht aufklaerungsfehler. Nutzt Normtext, Nutzerangaben und verifizierte Quellen; Rechtsprechung nur nach Live-Pruefung mit Gericht, Datum und Aktenzeichen.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Behandlungsfehler §§ 630a 630h BGB Verletzung medizinischer Standard. Diagnosefehler Therapiefehler Befunderhebungsfehler Hygienefehler. Beweisregeln § 630h BGB Vermutung Kausalität bei grobem Behandlungsfehler § 630h Abs. 5 BGB Befunderhebungsfehler Dokumentationsmangel. Schadensersatzanspruch §§ 280 823 BGB Schmerzensgeld § 253 BGB. Verjährung drei Jahre § 195 BGB ab Kenntnis 30 Jahre Hoechstfrist.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Mandant hatte Verkehrsunfall und fragt: Wer haftet wie viel und welche Schadensposten koennen geltend gemacht werden? §§ 7 17 18 StVG iVm § 254 BGB Haftungsquote. Prüfraster: Betriebsgefahr beidseitig Anscheinsbeweis Auffahrunfall Spurwechsel Rotlicht Vorfahrt Mithaftung Tempo Sicherheitsabstand Anschnall. Schadenspositionen Reparatur fiktive Abrechnung Mietwagen Nutzungsausfall Sachverständige Schmerzensgeld. Output: Haftungsquoten-Berechnung und Schadenstabelle. Abgrenzung zu fachanwalt-verkehrsrecht-regulierungsanforderung (Gläubigerseite vs. Versicherer) und fachanwalt-verkehrsrecht-versicherer-quotenverhandlung-vergleich.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Verkehrsunfall-Mandat im Zivilprozess vorbereiten: Schadensersatz, Schmerzensgeld, Versicherungskorrespondenz. Normen: §§ 7 18 StVG, §§ 823 253 BGB, § 115 VVG. Prüfraster: Haftungsquote, Schadensposten, Verjaebrung, Regulierungsablauf. Output: Klageschrift Verkehrsunfall oder Klageerwiderung. Abgrenzung: nicht Strafrecht oder Ordnungswidrigkeiten.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Analyzes an entire portfolio of contracts at scale — extracting key terms, obligations, renewal dates, risk provisions, and financial commitments across hundreds or thousands of agreements simultaneously. Produces structured reports, obligation trackers, renewal calendars, and risk matrices. Also supports playbook-based redlining where contracts are compared against preferred positions and automatically marked up. Use when an in-house legal team, GC, legal ops, procurement, or finance team needs portfolio-wide visibility into contract terms, upcoming renewals, obligation compliance, or batch contract review against organizational standards.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Classifies personal vs non-personal data per GDPR Art. 4(1) definition test with decision tree for borderline cases. References Breyer v Germany CJEU C-582/14 dynamic IP ruling and WP29 Opinion 4/2007. Keywords: personal data, GDPR Art 4, data classification, Breyer ruling, identifiability test, PII.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Use when a matter involves marriage, divorce, property division, custody, or inheritance for non-Muslim residents of the UAE under Federal Decree-Law 41/2022 (the UAE Civil Personal Status Law) or the DIFC Wills Service Centre. Covers no-fault divorce, joint-custody default, equal-property division, testamentary freedom for non-Muslims, pre-nuptial agreement enforceability, and the parallel DIFC/ADGM wills regimes. Contrasts with the UAE Personal Status Law 28/2005 (Sharia-based) which governs Muslim residents. Triggers on non-Muslim divorce UAE, UAE civil marriage, DIFC wills, UAE prenup, or expat family law UAE questions.

Skills associés