Communitygithub.com

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Drafts a structured personal injury client intake form for initial consultations covering client identification, incident details, injury/treatment history, insurance, prior legal history, and authorizations. Supports conflict checking, case evaluation, and engagement setup. Use when onboarding a new PI client, creating intake questionnaires, or building pre-filing client records. Trigger keywords: personal injury intake, client onboarding, PI questionnaire, accident intake, injury claim intake.

Qu'est-ce que legal-skills-open ?

legal-skills-open is a Claude Code agent skill that drafts a structured personal injury client intake form for initial consultations covering client identification, incident details, injury/treatment history, insurance, prior legal history, and authorizations. Supports conflict checking, case evaluation, and engagement setup. Use when onboarding a new PI client, creating intake questionnaires, or building pre-filing client records. Trigger keywords: personal injury intake, client onboarding, PI questionnaire, accident intake, injury claim intake.

Compatible avec~Claude Code~Codex CLI~Cursor
npx skills add https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open/tree/HEAD/us/personal-injury/skills/pi-intake-form

Demander à votre IA préférée

Ouvre une nouvelle conversation avec cette compétence d'agent déjà préchargée.

Documentation

Personal Injury Client Intake Form

Drafts a fillable intake form for prospective personal injury clients that supports conflict checking, statute-of-limitations tracking, case evaluation, and engagement setup.

Prerequisites

  1. Jurisdiction — state of incident and client residence (determines SOL, comparative fault rules, damage caps, no-fault requirements).
  2. Firm details — firm name, address, contact info, fee structure (contingency percentage, cost advancement policy).
  3. Documents already provided — accident reports, medical records, photos, correspondence — to pre-populate fields and generate follow-up questions.

Output Structure

Generate a fillable intake form with the following sections in order. Calculate and flag the statute-of-limitations deadline prominently at the top based on jurisdiction and incident type.

1) Client Identification

FieldNotes
Full legal nameAs on government ID
Former names / aliasesFor conflict checking
Date of birth
SSN (last 4 only)Include privacy notice
Residential address
Mailing address (if different)
Marital status / spouse nameLoss-of-consortium relevance
Dependents (names, ages)Wrongful death relevance

2) Contact & Communication

FieldNotes
Primary phoneMobile / landline
Secondary phone
Email (personal / work)
Preferred contact methodPhone / email / text / portal
Do NOT contact atConfidentiality concerns
Text/email consentSecurity limitation warning
Authorized recipientsOthers permitted case info
Interpreter / accommodationLanguage or accessibility needs

3) Incident Details

  • Date of incident — flag SOL deadline (verify jurisdiction-specific period)
  • Location — street address, city, county, state
  • Type — motor vehicle, slip/fall, premises liability, product liability, medical malpractice, dog bite, workplace, other
  • Narrative — client's own words, chronological
  • Conditions — weather, road, environmental (if applicable)
  • Police / incident report — report number, agency
  • Witnesses — name, phone, relationship, observations
  • Photos / video — scene, injuries, property damage

4) Parties Involved

For each opposing party and additional involved parties:

FieldDetails
Full name
RoleAt-fault driver, property owner, employer, manufacturer, etc.
Contact info / address
Insurance carrier & policy #If known
Attorney (if represented)Name, firm, contact
EmployerIf commercial vehicle / on-the-job
Relationship to clientStranger, employer, landlord, etc.

Ensure every named person/entity is captured for conflict-system intake.

5) Injuries & Medical Treatment

  • Injuries sustained — body parts, diagnosis if known
  • Ambulance transport — destination facility
  • ER / urgent care — date, facility
  • Treating physicians — name, specialty, facility, treatment dates
  • Ongoing treatment — PT, scheduled surgery, pain management
  • Pre-existing conditions — same body parts or related (critical for causation)
  • Lost work days — dates, employer, wage rate
  • Current symptom status — improving / stable / worsening
  • Medical records authorization — HIPAA-compliant release attached

6) Insurance Information

TypeCarrierPolicy #Limits (if known)
Client auto
Client health
UM/UIM coverage
MedPay / PIP
At-fault liability
Homeowner's / renter's
Umbrella
  • Recorded statement given? — to whom, when (flag as red flag)
  • Signed anything from opposing insurer? — flag immediately

Note: no-fault states require adjusted insurance sections [VERIFY jurisdiction].

7) Property Damage

  • Vehicle year/make/model, current location
  • Repair estimate or total loss determination
  • Rental car status
  • Personal property damaged

8) Prior Legal History

  • Prior attorneys on this matter — name, firm, dates, reason ended
  • Pending / prior litigation (past 10 years) — case, court, status
  • Prior PI claims — critical for credibility and IME preparation
  • Criminal history — may be discoverable
  • Bankruptcy filings — affects claim ownership
  • Family members with matters at firm — conflict check

9) Financial / Fee Discussion

  • Employment status and occupation
  • Income range (bracketed: <$25K / $25-50K / $50-100K / $100K+)
  • Contingency fee explanation — plain-language description
  • Cost advancement acknowledgment
  • Lien awareness — Medicare, Medicaid, ERISA, workers' comp, child support

State that a separate written contingency fee agreement will follow if the firm accepts the matter. Do not include a fee agreement in the intake form.

10) Authorizations & Disclosures

Include with signature lines:

  • No attorney-client relationship disclaimer — intake does not create representation
  • Medical records authorization (HIPAA-compliant, separate signature)
  • Employment records authorization
  • Insurance records authorization
  • Third-party communication consent
  • Data privacy notice
  • Text/email communication consent (with security warnings)
  • Accuracy acknowledgment

Signature blocks: prospective client, intake attorney, date.

Guidelines

  • Flag SOL deadline at top of completed form; verify jurisdiction-specific periods.
  • Use plain language throughout — clients are often injured and stressed.
  • Pre-populate from uploaded documents; generate specific follow-up questions for gaps.
  • Capture all named persons/entities in conflict-check-compatible format.
  • Note state-specific variations: no-fault insurance, pure vs. modified comparative fault, damage caps [VERIFY].
  • Flag red flags early: prior recorded statements, signed releases, pre-existing conditions in same body part, approaching SOL.
  • Formatting: minimum 11pt body, adequate white space, section headers, fillable fields.
  • Use [VERIFY] for all jurisdiction-specific rules before finalizing.

Cross-references

  • @demand-letter-personal-injury
  • @medical-records-summary
  • @contingency-fee-agreement
  • @hipaa-authorization

Individual skills in this repo

This repo contains 20 individual skills — each has its own dedicated page.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Track the IP portfolio — registrations, renewals, maintenance fees, and use declarations. Use when checking what's renewing, adding or updating an asset, recording a maintenance filing, or auditing the register for gaps, lapses, and use-in-commerce questions. Receives handoffs from prosecution and clearance work.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

When the user's message starts with "Canada" (case-insensitive), generate a full Ontario PI Case Assessment Memo from the case_stressor corpus and return it verbatim. This is the primary handler for Canadian fact patterns — DO NOT ask clarifying questions first; run the memo and let the lawyer react.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

交通事故责任评估与判定专业技能。当用户需要交通事故责任分析、事故现场照片评估、交通法规咨询、事故责任划分、法律依据查询时触发此技能。适用于车辆碰撞事故、行人事故、非机动车事故等各类道路交通事故的责任认定场景。无论用户使用"交通事故"、"车祸"、"责任判定"、"交通法规"、"事故定责"等何种表述,只要涉及交通事故评估或责任认定,均应调用此技能。

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Strategische Markenportfolio-Planung für Luxus-Modehaeuser: Mandant will Marken in DE/EU/international schützen oder Portfolio optimieren. Normen: §§ 32 ff. MarkenG, Art. 32 ff. UMV (EU) 2017/1001, Madrid-Protokoll (WIPO). Prüfraster: Nizza-Klassen (3/14/18/25/35), Multi-Class-Strategie, Prioritaets-Kaskade, Kostenoptimierung, Anmeldezeitpunkt. Output Marken-Portfolio-Plan, Anmelde-Empfehlung je Territorium, Kostenprojektion. Abgrenzung: Einzelne Anmeldung DPMA siehe wortmarke-anmeldung-dpma; Madrid-Protokoll Details siehe madrid-protokoll-und-internationale-registrierung.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Audit an intellectual-property portfolio for ownership, protection, scope, deadlines, territorial coverage, use, value, encumbrances, and enforcement risk. Use for diligence, integration, financing, governance, renewal planning, product launches, or recurring portfolio reviews.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Use whenever the user asks about a motor-vehicle statute, citation, contributing factor, OR a Canadian personal-injury fact pattern — always query Specter's Harvester API before answering. The API auto-routes between two collections (US statutes + Canadian PI case law).

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Assesses product liability exposure on given facts — classifying the defect as manufacturing, design, or warning/instruction, mapping which party in the supply chain is potentially exposed, and grading the realistic exposure. Use this whenever a user wants product liability worked through rather than a general deficiency test — including phrasings like "what's our exposure if this product injured someone", "is this a design defect or a manufacturing defect", "who in the supply chain is on the hook here", "assess our product liability risk on these facts", or "how exposed are we if the warning label was inadequate". Distinct from deficiency-analyst, which tests service and trade-practice thresholds — this is specific to defective products and supply-chain exposure. Fires for any product liability question, in any jurisdiction, for manufacturers, assemblers, sellers, distributors, or importers.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

KI-VO Hochrisiko-Anforderungen für Personalwesen in Kanzleien ab August 2026: Anwendungsfall Kanzlei setzt KI im HR-Bereich ein oder beraet Mandanten zum AGG-konformen KI-Einsatz bei Bewerberauswahl. Anhang III Nr. 4 KI-VO Hochrisiko Bewerberauswahl, Inkrafttreten 2. August 2026, AGG Diskriminierungsverbot. Prüfraster Hochrisiko-Klassifizierung eigener HR-KI, Konformitätsbewertung, Transparenzpflichten für Betroffene, Beratungsmandate Arbeitsrecht. Output Checkliste Hochrisiko-Anforderungen mit Umsetzungsplan für August 2026. Abgrenzung zu Bias-und-Diskriminierung-Prüfung und zu KI-VO-Betreiber-Pflichten.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Vorlagetabelle für Portfolio-Review von Arbeitsvertraegen im 3D-Format: Forderung/Prüfung/Stellung. Normen: BGB, KSchG, ArbZG. Prüfraster: Vertragsbedingungen, Klauselgueltigkeit, HR-Compliance. Output: Arbeitsvertrag-Portfolio-Tabelle. Abgrenzung: nicht allgemeine 3D-Review-Konfiguration.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Unternehmen oder Kanzlei muss IP-Portfolio verwalten und anstehende Fristen im Blick behalten. Schutzrechtsportfolio-Verwaltung. Prüfraster: Eintragungen Verlaengerungen Jahresgebühren Benutzungsnachweise Fristkalender. Output: Fristenkalender und Portfolio-Audit mit Luecken Verfall und Benutzungsfragen. Abgrenzung zu schutzschrift-eilverfuegung (Verletzungsverteidigung) und markenanmeldung-dpma.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Statusuebersicht aller laufenden Prozessmandate: Fristen, Verfahrensstand, naechste Schritte. Normen: ZPO, RVG. Prüfraster: Fristenliste, offene Anträge, Termine, Mahnfristen. Output: Portfolio-Statusbericht Prozessmandate. Abgrenzung: nicht Einzelmandat-Briefing.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Workflow-Skill zu aufklaerungsfehler beweisstrategie. Nutzt Normtext, Nutzerangaben und verifizierte Quellen; Rechtsprechung nur nach Live-Pruefung mit Gericht, Datum und Aktenzeichen.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Strukturierte Prüfung von Ansprüchen wegen Behandlungsfehler nach §§ 630a ff. BGB iVm § 823 BGB. Behandlungsvertrag Aufklärungspflicht § 630e BGB Dokumentationspflicht § 630f BGB Beweislastregeln § 630h BGB grober Behandlungsfehler Beweislastumkehr voll beherrschbares Risiko Anfaengerstandard Schmerzensgeld § 253 BGB. Schlichtungsstelle Aerztekammer MDK-Gutachten. Verjährung drei Jahre § 195 BGB Hoechstfrist dreissig Jahre § 199 Abs. 2 BGB.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Workflow-Skill zu fachanwalt medizinrecht aufklaerungsfehler. Nutzt Normtext, Nutzerangaben und verifizierte Quellen; Rechtsprechung nur nach Live-Pruefung mit Gericht, Datum und Aktenzeichen.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Behandlungsfehler §§ 630a 630h BGB Verletzung medizinischer Standard. Diagnosefehler Therapiefehler Befunderhebungsfehler Hygienefehler. Beweisregeln § 630h BGB Vermutung Kausalität bei grobem Behandlungsfehler § 630h Abs. 5 BGB Befunderhebungsfehler Dokumentationsmangel. Schadensersatzanspruch §§ 280 823 BGB Schmerzensgeld § 253 BGB. Verjährung drei Jahre § 195 BGB ab Kenntnis 30 Jahre Hoechstfrist.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Mandant hatte Verkehrsunfall und fragt: Wer haftet wie viel und welche Schadensposten koennen geltend gemacht werden? §§ 7 17 18 StVG iVm § 254 BGB Haftungsquote. Prüfraster: Betriebsgefahr beidseitig Anscheinsbeweis Auffahrunfall Spurwechsel Rotlicht Vorfahrt Mithaftung Tempo Sicherheitsabstand Anschnall. Schadenspositionen Reparatur fiktive Abrechnung Mietwagen Nutzungsausfall Sachverständige Schmerzensgeld. Output: Haftungsquoten-Berechnung und Schadenstabelle. Abgrenzung zu fachanwalt-verkehrsrecht-regulierungsanforderung (Gläubigerseite vs. Versicherer) und fachanwalt-verkehrsrecht-versicherer-quotenverhandlung-vergleich.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Verkehrsunfall-Mandat im Zivilprozess vorbereiten: Schadensersatz, Schmerzensgeld, Versicherungskorrespondenz. Normen: §§ 7 18 StVG, §§ 823 253 BGB, § 115 VVG. Prüfraster: Haftungsquote, Schadensposten, Verjaebrung, Regulierungsablauf. Output: Klageschrift Verkehrsunfall oder Klageerwiderung. Abgrenzung: nicht Strafrecht oder Ordnungswidrigkeiten.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Analyzes an entire portfolio of contracts at scale — extracting key terms, obligations, renewal dates, risk provisions, and financial commitments across hundreds or thousands of agreements simultaneously. Produces structured reports, obligation trackers, renewal calendars, and risk matrices. Also supports playbook-based redlining where contracts are compared against preferred positions and automatically marked up. Use when an in-house legal team, GC, legal ops, procurement, or finance team needs portfolio-wide visibility into contract terms, upcoming renewals, obligation compliance, or batch contract review against organizational standards.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Classifies personal vs non-personal data per GDPR Art. 4(1) definition test with decision tree for borderline cases. References Breyer v Germany CJEU C-582/14 dynamic IP ruling and WP29 Opinion 4/2007. Keywords: personal data, GDPR Art 4, data classification, Breyer ruling, identifiability test, PII.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Use when a matter involves marriage, divorce, property division, custody, or inheritance for non-Muslim residents of the UAE under Federal Decree-Law 41/2022 (the UAE Civil Personal Status Law) or the DIFC Wills Service Centre. Covers no-fault divorce, joint-custody default, equal-property division, testamentary freedom for non-Muslims, pre-nuptial agreement enforceability, and the parallel DIFC/ADGM wills regimes. Contrasts with the UAE Personal Status Law 28/2005 (Sharia-based) which governs Muslim residents. Triggers on non-Muslim divorce UAE, UAE civil marriage, DIFC wills, UAE prenup, or expat family law UAE questions.

Skills associés