Communitygithub.com

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Drafts a court-ready Complaint for Negligence establishing duty, breach, causation, and damages with jurisdiction-aware pleading standards (Twombly-Iqbal federal vs. state notice/fact pleading). Use when filing a negligence complaint, initiating a personal injury suit, or pleading tort claims such as motor vehicle collisions, premises liability, or professional negligence.

Qu'est-ce que legal-skills-open ?

legal-skills-open is a Claude Code agent skill that drafts a court-ready Complaint for Negligence establishing duty, breach, causation, and damages with jurisdiction-aware pleading standards (Twombly-Iqbal federal vs. state notice/fact pleading). Use when filing a negligence complaint, initiating a personal injury suit, or pleading tort claims such as motor vehicle collisions, premises liability, or professional negligence.

Compatible avec✓Claude Code~Codex CLI~Cursor
npx skills add https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open/tree/HEAD/us/personal-injury/skills/complaint-for-negligence

Demander à votre IA préférée

Ouvre une nouvelle conversation avec cette compétence d'agent déjà préchargée.

Documentation

Complaint for Negligence

Drafts a litigation-ready negligence complaint that survives a motion to dismiss and positions the plaintiff for discovery leverage.

Prerequisites

Gather before drafting:

  • Incident facts — date, time, location, parties, sequence of events
  • Defendant identification — full legal name, entity type, domicile, registered agent
  • Medical records — diagnoses, treatment timeline, itemized expenses
  • Economic losses — wage records, property damage, lost earnings
  • Jurisdiction/venue — court, pleading standard, local rules
  • Governing authority — statutes, codes, or professional standards (for negligence per se)

Drafting Workflow

1. Caption

  • Full court name with division/district/county
  • All party names (verify corporate names via secretary of state)
  • Case number field; title: COMPLAINT FOR NEGLIGENCE

2. Jurisdiction and Venue

Federal: Diversity under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (complete diversity + >$75K). Venue per 28 U.S.C. § 1391 (defendant residence, where events occurred, or personal jurisdiction).

State: Cite general jurisdiction statute for tort claims. Venue where defendant resides, cause arose, or substantial business conducted.

Include factual allegations supporting venue — specific address, county, district.

3. Parties

Plaintiffs: Full name, address (city, county, state), legal status. For minors: name guardian ad litem with authority.

Defendants: Full name, address, entity type. For employed defendants, allege course-and-scope employment to lay respondeat superior foundation.

4. Factual Allegations

Draft chronological numbered paragraphs with discrete, observable facts. No legal conclusions.

  1. Background — party relationships, defendant's role/control, plaintiff's status
  2. Incident — date/time, precise location, sequence with measurements, speeds, conditions
  3. Injuries — fracture type/location, diagnoses, surgical interventions
  4. Treatment — emergency transport, hospitalization, surgery, rehab, future needs
  5. Economic losses — itemized medical expenses, lost wages, property damage, future costs
  6. Non-economic losses — pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment, disfigurement, consortium

Key standard: Replace conclusions with concrete facts. Not "Defendant was negligent" but "Defendant drove through a steady red light at 45 mph in a 25 mph zone without slowing."

5. Negligence Count

Reallegation paragraph, then plead each element separately:

ElementWhat to Allege
DutySpecific standard of care (reasonable care on roadway, professional standard in locality)
BreachSpecific acts or omissions violating the standard
CausationBut-for + proximate cause; substantial factor if multiple causes
DamagesPhysical injuries, medical expenses, lost wages, earning capacity, pain and suffering

Negligence per se (if applicable): Identify violated statute, protected class, type of harm. Allege violation constitutes negligence as a matter of law.

Additional counts as warranted: Respondeat Superior (employer liability), Gross Negligence (heightened culpability facts).

6. Prayer for Relief

  • Compensatory damages (general + special)
  • Past and future medical expenses
  • Past and future lost wages / earning capacity
  • Property damage
  • Pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment, disfigurement
  • Pre-judgment interest (cite authorizing statute; not universally available)
  • Post-judgment interest, costs of suit, attorney's fees (only if fee-shifting applies)
  • Catchall: "Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper."
  • Jury demand: "Plaintiff demands trial by jury on all issues so triable." File with complaint to preserve FRCP 38 rights.

7. Signature Block

  • Attorney name (as registered), bar number, firm, address, phone, email
  • FRCP 11 / state equivalent certification implicit in signature
  • Verification if required by state: sworn statement of truth; some jurisdictions require notarization

Pitfalls and Checks

  • Pleading standard mismatch — Federal requires Twombly/Iqbal plausibility; state may follow notice, fact, or code pleading. Determine standard before calibrating specificity.
  • Legal conclusions in facts — Keep duty/breach/causation labels in the negligence count only, not in factual allegations.
  • Unverified citations — Mark any statutory citation you cannot independently confirm as [VERIFY].
  • Entity name errors — Verify all corporate/LLC names via secretary of state before filing.
  • Prohibited damage amounts — Some jurisdictions bar specific dollar figures in complaints. Research local rules first.
  • Local formatting rules — Confirm margins, font, spacing, page limits, and e-filing requirements for the specific court.
  • Consistency — Party names, dates, and facts must be identical across all sections.

Key changes from the original:

  • Removed tags — not part of the Agent Skills spec; only name and description are recognized frontmatter fields
  • Tightened description — trimmed from ~400 to ~290 chars while preserving all trigger keywords and legal specificity
  • Restructured body to follow best-practices pattern: overview → prerequisites → workflow steps → pitfalls
  • Compressed jurisdiction table into inline prose — same legal content, ~40% fewer tokens
  • Eliminated redundant explanation (e.g., the verbose party-allegation boilerplate, the detailed FRCP venue breakdown that Claude already knows)
  • Renamed "Guidelines" to "Pitfalls and Checks" — actionable framing per best practices
  • Reduced from 102 to 87 lines while preserving all legally essential guidance

Individual skills in this repo

This repo contains 20 individual skills — each has its own dedicated page.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Track the IP portfolio — registrations, renewals, maintenance fees, and use declarations. Use when checking what's renewing, adding or updating an asset, recording a maintenance filing, or auditing the register for gaps, lapses, and use-in-commerce questions. Receives handoffs from prosecution and clearance work.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

When the user's message starts with "Canada" (case-insensitive), generate a full Ontario PI Case Assessment Memo from the case_stressor corpus and return it verbatim. This is the primary handler for Canadian fact patterns — DO NOT ask clarifying questions first; run the memo and let the lawyer react.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

交通事故责任评估与判定专业技能。当用户需要交通事故责任分析、事故现场照片评估、交通法规咨询、事故责任划分、法律依据查询时触发此技能。适用于车辆碰撞事故、行人事故、非机动车事故等各类道路交通事故的责任认定场景。无论用户使用"交通事故"、"车祸"、"责任判定"、"交通法规"、"事故定责"等何种表述,只要涉及交通事故评估或责任认定,均应调用此技能。

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Strategische Markenportfolio-Planung für Luxus-Modehaeuser: Mandant will Marken in DE/EU/international schützen oder Portfolio optimieren. Normen: §§ 32 ff. MarkenG, Art. 32 ff. UMV (EU) 2017/1001, Madrid-Protokoll (WIPO). Prüfraster: Nizza-Klassen (3/14/18/25/35), Multi-Class-Strategie, Prioritaets-Kaskade, Kostenoptimierung, Anmeldezeitpunkt. Output Marken-Portfolio-Plan, Anmelde-Empfehlung je Territorium, Kostenprojektion. Abgrenzung: Einzelne Anmeldung DPMA siehe wortmarke-anmeldung-dpma; Madrid-Protokoll Details siehe madrid-protokoll-und-internationale-registrierung.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Audit an intellectual-property portfolio for ownership, protection, scope, deadlines, territorial coverage, use, value, encumbrances, and enforcement risk. Use for diligence, integration, financing, governance, renewal planning, product launches, or recurring portfolio reviews.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Use whenever the user asks about a motor-vehicle statute, citation, contributing factor, OR a Canadian personal-injury fact pattern — always query Specter's Harvester API before answering. The API auto-routes between two collections (US statutes + Canadian PI case law).

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Assesses product liability exposure on given facts — classifying the defect as manufacturing, design, or warning/instruction, mapping which party in the supply chain is potentially exposed, and grading the realistic exposure. Use this whenever a user wants product liability worked through rather than a general deficiency test — including phrasings like "what's our exposure if this product injured someone", "is this a design defect or a manufacturing defect", "who in the supply chain is on the hook here", "assess our product liability risk on these facts", or "how exposed are we if the warning label was inadequate". Distinct from deficiency-analyst, which tests service and trade-practice thresholds — this is specific to defective products and supply-chain exposure. Fires for any product liability question, in any jurisdiction, for manufacturers, assemblers, sellers, distributors, or importers.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

KI-VO Hochrisiko-Anforderungen für Personalwesen in Kanzleien ab August 2026: Anwendungsfall Kanzlei setzt KI im HR-Bereich ein oder beraet Mandanten zum AGG-konformen KI-Einsatz bei Bewerberauswahl. Anhang III Nr. 4 KI-VO Hochrisiko Bewerberauswahl, Inkrafttreten 2. August 2026, AGG Diskriminierungsverbot. Prüfraster Hochrisiko-Klassifizierung eigener HR-KI, Konformitätsbewertung, Transparenzpflichten für Betroffene, Beratungsmandate Arbeitsrecht. Output Checkliste Hochrisiko-Anforderungen mit Umsetzungsplan für August 2026. Abgrenzung zu Bias-und-Diskriminierung-Prüfung und zu KI-VO-Betreiber-Pflichten.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Vorlagetabelle für Portfolio-Review von Arbeitsvertraegen im 3D-Format: Forderung/Prüfung/Stellung. Normen: BGB, KSchG, ArbZG. Prüfraster: Vertragsbedingungen, Klauselgueltigkeit, HR-Compliance. Output: Arbeitsvertrag-Portfolio-Tabelle. Abgrenzung: nicht allgemeine 3D-Review-Konfiguration.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Unternehmen oder Kanzlei muss IP-Portfolio verwalten und anstehende Fristen im Blick behalten. Schutzrechtsportfolio-Verwaltung. Prüfraster: Eintragungen Verlaengerungen Jahresgebühren Benutzungsnachweise Fristkalender. Output: Fristenkalender und Portfolio-Audit mit Luecken Verfall und Benutzungsfragen. Abgrenzung zu schutzschrift-eilverfuegung (Verletzungsverteidigung) und markenanmeldung-dpma.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Statusuebersicht aller laufenden Prozessmandate: Fristen, Verfahrensstand, naechste Schritte. Normen: ZPO, RVG. Prüfraster: Fristenliste, offene Anträge, Termine, Mahnfristen. Output: Portfolio-Statusbericht Prozessmandate. Abgrenzung: nicht Einzelmandat-Briefing.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Workflow-Skill zu aufklaerungsfehler beweisstrategie. Nutzt Normtext, Nutzerangaben und verifizierte Quellen; Rechtsprechung nur nach Live-Pruefung mit Gericht, Datum und Aktenzeichen.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Strukturierte Prüfung von Ansprüchen wegen Behandlungsfehler nach §§ 630a ff. BGB iVm § 823 BGB. Behandlungsvertrag Aufklärungspflicht § 630e BGB Dokumentationspflicht § 630f BGB Beweislastregeln § 630h BGB grober Behandlungsfehler Beweislastumkehr voll beherrschbares Risiko Anfaengerstandard Schmerzensgeld § 253 BGB. Schlichtungsstelle Aerztekammer MDK-Gutachten. Verjährung drei Jahre § 195 BGB Hoechstfrist dreissig Jahre § 199 Abs. 2 BGB.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Workflow-Skill zu fachanwalt medizinrecht aufklaerungsfehler. Nutzt Normtext, Nutzerangaben und verifizierte Quellen; Rechtsprechung nur nach Live-Pruefung mit Gericht, Datum und Aktenzeichen.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Behandlungsfehler §§ 630a 630h BGB Verletzung medizinischer Standard. Diagnosefehler Therapiefehler Befunderhebungsfehler Hygienefehler. Beweisregeln § 630h BGB Vermutung Kausalität bei grobem Behandlungsfehler § 630h Abs. 5 BGB Befunderhebungsfehler Dokumentationsmangel. Schadensersatzanspruch §§ 280 823 BGB Schmerzensgeld § 253 BGB. Verjährung drei Jahre § 195 BGB ab Kenntnis 30 Jahre Hoechstfrist.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Mandant hatte Verkehrsunfall und fragt: Wer haftet wie viel und welche Schadensposten koennen geltend gemacht werden? §§ 7 17 18 StVG iVm § 254 BGB Haftungsquote. Prüfraster: Betriebsgefahr beidseitig Anscheinsbeweis Auffahrunfall Spurwechsel Rotlicht Vorfahrt Mithaftung Tempo Sicherheitsabstand Anschnall. Schadenspositionen Reparatur fiktive Abrechnung Mietwagen Nutzungsausfall Sachverständige Schmerzensgeld. Output: Haftungsquoten-Berechnung und Schadenstabelle. Abgrenzung zu fachanwalt-verkehrsrecht-regulierungsanforderung (Gläubigerseite vs. Versicherer) und fachanwalt-verkehrsrecht-versicherer-quotenverhandlung-vergleich.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Verkehrsunfall-Mandat im Zivilprozess vorbereiten: Schadensersatz, Schmerzensgeld, Versicherungskorrespondenz. Normen: §§ 7 18 StVG, §§ 823 253 BGB, § 115 VVG. Prüfraster: Haftungsquote, Schadensposten, Verjaebrung, Regulierungsablauf. Output: Klageschrift Verkehrsunfall oder Klageerwiderung. Abgrenzung: nicht Strafrecht oder Ordnungswidrigkeiten.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Analyzes an entire portfolio of contracts at scale — extracting key terms, obligations, renewal dates, risk provisions, and financial commitments across hundreds or thousands of agreements simultaneously. Produces structured reports, obligation trackers, renewal calendars, and risk matrices. Also supports playbook-based redlining where contracts are compared against preferred positions and automatically marked up. Use when an in-house legal team, GC, legal ops, procurement, or finance team needs portfolio-wide visibility into contract terms, upcoming renewals, obligation compliance, or batch contract review against organizational standards.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Classifies personal vs non-personal data per GDPR Art. 4(1) definition test with decision tree for borderline cases. References Breyer v Germany CJEU C-582/14 dynamic IP ruling and WP29 Opinion 4/2007. Keywords: personal data, GDPR Art 4, data classification, Breyer ruling, identifiability test, PII.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Use when a matter involves marriage, divorce, property division, custody, or inheritance for non-Muslim residents of the UAE under Federal Decree-Law 41/2022 (the UAE Civil Personal Status Law) or the DIFC Wills Service Centre. Covers no-fault divorce, joint-custody default, equal-property division, testamentary freedom for non-Muslims, pre-nuptial agreement enforceability, and the parallel DIFC/ADGM wills regimes. Contrasts with the UAE Personal Status Law 28/2005 (Sharia-based) which governs Muslim residents. Triggers on non-Muslim divorce UAE, UAE civil marriage, DIFC wills, UAE prenup, or expat family law UAE questions.

Skills associés