Communitygithub.com

auditing-uefi-firmware-with-chipsec

Use Intel CHIPSEC to assess platform firmware configuration, SPI flash write protection, BIOS lock, SMM/SMRR, and Secure Boot variable state, dump SPI flash, and triage UEFI variables for firmware-level threats.

Qu'est-ce que auditing-uefi-firmware-with-chipsec ?

auditing-uefi-firmware-with-chipsec is a Claude Code agent skill that use Intel CHIPSEC to assess platform firmware configuration, SPI flash write protection, BIOS lock, SMM/SMRR, and Secure Boot variable state, dump SPI flash, and triage UEFI variables for firmware-level threats.

Compatible avec~Claude Code~Codex CLI~Cursor
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/tree/main/skills/auditing-uefi-firmware-with-chipsec

Demander à votre IA préférée

Ouvre une nouvelle conversation avec cette compétence d'agent déjà préchargée.

Documentation

Auditing UEFI Firmware with CHIPSEC

Authorized Use Only: CHIPSEC loads a kernel driver and reads/writes low-level hardware registers, SPI flash, and SMM. Run it only on systems you own or are explicitly authorized to assess, ideally on dedicated test hardware. Misuse (especially write/modify modules) can brick a machine. Never run write-capable modules on production systems.

Overview

CHIPSEC is the open-source Platform Security Assessment Framework created by Intel's Advanced Threat Research team. It inspects the low-level security configuration of x86 platform firmware and hardware — the layer below the operating system where bootkits and firmware implants live. CHIPSEC loads a signed kernel driver (Linux, Windows, or it can run from the UEFI shell) to read and write hardware registers, Model-Specific Registers (MSRs), PCI config space, SPI flash, and UEFI variables, then runs an automated test suite that checks whether the platform's defensive locks are actually engaged.

The threat CHIPSEC addresses is MITRE ATT&CK T1542.001 — Pre-OS Boot: System Firmware: adversaries who modify system firmware (the BIOS/UEFI image on SPI flash) to gain stealthy, persistent, OS-survivable control. Firmware implants persist across OS reinstall and disk replacement and are invisible to most EDR. CHIPSEC's value is verifying the prerequisites that prevent such implants: that the SPI flash BIOS region is write-protected (BIOS_CNTL BLE/SMM_BWP, SPI Protected Ranges), that the flash descriptor locks region access, that SMRAM/SMRR are configured, and that Secure Boot variables are protected. It also dumps the SPI flash for offline forensic comparison.

Sources: Intel/CHIPSEC project (https://github.com/chipsec/chipsec), CHIPSEC documentation (https://chipsec.github.io/).

When to Use

  • Baseline firmware-security assessment of a new laptop/server platform or fleet image
  • Verifying that BIOS write protection and SPI flash locks are correctly enabled by the OEM
  • Firmware forensics: dumping SPI flash to compare against a known-good image
  • Validating Secure Boot variable protection and S3 boot-script protection
  • Hunting for evidence of a firmware implant or misconfiguration enabling one

Prerequisites

  • Physical or admin/root access to the target x86 platform (Intel or AMD)
  • Linux (root) or Windows (Administrator), or a UEFI shell environment
  • Ability to load a kernel driver (Secure Boot may need to allow the CHIPSEC driver, or use --no_driver for limited checks)
  • Python 3.8+ and a C compiler/build tools for the kernel module on Linux
  • Dedicated test hardware strongly recommended

Install CHIPSEC:

# From PyPI
pip install chipsec

# Or from source (builds the kernel helper/driver)
git clone https://github.com/chipsec/chipsec
cd chipsec
python setup.py install        # builds and installs, including the Linux driver

# Verify
sudo chipsec_main --help
sudo chipsec_util --help

Objectives

  • Run the full automated platform-security test suite and interpret PASS/FAIL/WARNING
  • Verify BIOS write protection (BIOS_CNTL) and SPI Protected Ranges
  • Verify the SPI flash descriptor locks region read/write access
  • Verify SMRAM/SMRR and SMI handler protections
  • Verify Secure Boot variable protection and S3 boot-script protection
  • Dump SPI flash and decode it for offline analysis
  • Enumerate UEFI variables and detect anomalous/unexpected entries

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

Technique IDNameTactic
T1542.001Pre-OS Boot: System FirmwarePersistence / Defense Evasion

CHIPSEC defends against T1542.001 by verifying that the controls preventing unauthorized firmware modification are enabled. A FAIL on common.bios_wp (BIOS not write-protected) or chipsec.modules.common.spi_lock (flash descriptor unlocked) means an attacker with OS privileges could rewrite the SPI flash and implant persistent firmware — exactly the precondition for this technique.

Workflow

Step 1: Run the full automated test suite

chipsec_main with no module argument runs every applicable security check for the detected platform and prints a summary of PASS/FAIL/WARNING/INFORMATION results.

sudo chipsec_main

# Save machine-readable output for reporting / diffing
sudo chipsec_main -j results.json -x results.xml -l chipsec.log

Step 2: Run the core firmware-protection modules individually

The common module group contains the OEM-independent security checks. Run the group or specific modules:

# Run the whole common group
sudo chipsec_main -m common

# BIOS write protection: checks BIOS_CNTL BLE/SMM_BWP and SPI protected ranges
sudo chipsec_main -m common.bios_wp

# SPI flash descriptor lock (FLOCKDN) — are flash region accesses locked?
sudo chipsec_main -m common.spi_lock

# SMRR programming — protects SMRAM from cache-based attacks
sudo chipsec_main -m common.smrr

# SMM BIOS write protection
sudo chipsec_main -m common.smm

# S3 resume boot-script protection (against bootscript table attacks)
sudo chipsec_main -m common.uefi.s3bootscript

Step 3: Verify Secure Boot variable protection

# Checks that Secure Boot UEFI variables are properly protected
sudo chipsec_main -m common.secureboot.variables

# To actively test write protection of the variables (test hardware ONLY):
sudo chipsec_main -m common.secureboot.variables -a modify

Step 4: Inspect SPI flash region access permissions

# Report SPI flash regions, descriptor, and access permissions
sudo chipsec_util spi info

# Check the SPI access-control module
sudo chipsec_main -m common.spi_access

Step 5: Dump SPI flash for offline forensics

Dumping the flash lets you decode the firmware volumes and compare against a known-good OEM image.

# Dump the entire SPI flash to a file
sudo chipsec_util spi dump rom.bin

# Decode the dumped image: extracts firmware volumes, files, NVRAM variables, etc.
sudo chipsec_util decode rom.bin

Step 6: Enumerate and triage UEFI variables

# List all UEFI variables from the runtime interface
sudo chipsec_util uefi var-list

# List variables directly from the SPI image (offline)
sudo chipsec_util uefi var-find PK
sudo chipsec_util uefi var-read db <GUID> db.bin

# Decode the UEFI firmware structure
sudo chipsec_util uefi decode rom.bin

Step 7: Limited assessment without a kernel driver

Where loading the driver is impossible (locked-down Secure Boot), some checks still run read-only.

sudo chipsec_main -n            # --no_driver: skip checks that need the driver
sudo chipsec_main -p <PLATFORM> # force platform code if auto-detect fails

Step 8: Triage results and report

  • FAIL on bios_wp / spi_lock → firmware is rewritable from the OS: high risk for T1542.001.
  • FAIL on secureboot.variables → Secure Boot policy can be tampered.
  • Compare the spi dump against the OEM's known-good image (hash firmware volumes) to detect unauthorized modification.
  • Record platform, BIOS version, and every FAIL/WARNING with the relevant register values for the report.

Tools and Resources

ToolPurposeSource
chipsec_mainAutomated platform-security test suitehttps://github.com/chipsec/chipsec
chipsec_utilManual hardware/firmware access (spi, uefi, decode)https://chipsec.github.io/
UEFIToolGUI/CLI parsing of dumped UEFI imageshttps://github.com/LongSoft/UEFITool
Binarly fwhuntFirmware vulnerability/implant hunting ruleshttps://github.com/binarly-io/fwhunt-scan
NSA UEFI Secure Boot guidanceHardening referencehttps://media.defense.gov/

Core Module Reference

ModuleChecks
common.bios_wpBIOS_CNTL BLE / SMM_BWP and SPI Protected Ranges
common.spi_lockSPI flash descriptor FLOCKDN
common.spi_accessSPI flash region read/write permissions
common.smrrSystem Management Range Registers programming
common.smmSMM BIOS write protection
common.secureboot.variablesSecure Boot variable protection
common.uefi.s3bootscriptS3 resume boot-script protection

Validation Criteria

  • CHIPSEC installed and driver loads (or -n documented if not)
  • Full chipsec_main suite executed with JSON/XML/log output saved
  • common.bios_wp result interpreted (write protection state)
  • common.spi_lock / spi_access result interpreted (descriptor lock)
  • SMRR/SMM module results recorded
  • Secure Boot variable protection checked
  • SPI flash dumped and decoded for offline analysis
  • UEFI variables enumerated and triaged
  • All FAIL/WARNING findings documented with platform/BIOS version
  • Write/modify modules NOT run on production hardware

Individual skills in this repo

This repo contains 20 individual skills — each has its own dedicated page.

abusing-dpapi-for-credential-access

Extract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket

abusing-shadow-credentials-for-privesc

Take over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target

achieving-cmmc-level-2-compliance

>-

acquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcfldd

Create forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.

analyzing-active-directory-acl-abuse

Detect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3

analyzing-android-malware-with-apktool

Perform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.

analyzing-api-gateway-access-logs

Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect

analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator

Query ATT&CK data with attackcti, mitreattack-python, and stix2, then build MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers and multi-layer heatmap overlays mapping one or more APT groups

analyzing-azure-activity-logs-for-threats

Queries Azure Monitor activity logs and sign-in logs via azure-monitor-query

analyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples

Analyzes bootkit and advanced rootkit malware infecting the Master

analyzing-browser-forensics-with-hindsight

Parse Chromium-based browser databases with Hindsight to extract and correlate browsing history, downloads, cookies, cached content, autofill data, saved passwords, and extensions from Chrome, Edge, Brave, Opera, and Vivaldi into a unified timeline (XLSX, JSON, or SQLite output). Use during incident response, insider-threat investigations, or criminal cases when you need to reconstruct a user

analyzing-campaign-attribution-evidence

Systematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attribution assessments. Use when an incident investigation needs a defensible attribution confidence level.

analyzing-certificate-transparency-for-phishing

Monitor Certificate Transparency logs using crt.sh and Certstream to

analyzing-cloud-storage-access-patterns

Detect abnormal access in AWS S3, GCS, and Azure Blob Storage by analyzing CloudTrail Data Events, GCS audit logs, and Azure Storage Analytics for after-hours bulk downloads, new-IP access, and API-call spikes (e.g. GetObject) via statistical baselines and time-series anomaly detection. Use when investigating suspected cloud data exfiltration or building related detection rules.

analyzing-cobalt-strike-beacon-configuration

Extract and analyze Cobalt Strike beacon configuration from PE files

analyzing-cobaltstrike-malleable-c2-profiles

Parse and analyze Cobalt Strike Malleable C2 profiles with dissect.cobaltstrike (profiles and beacon-payload configs) and pyMalleableC2 (AST parsing) to extract HTTP/DNS transforms, URIs, headers, sleep/jitter, and injection behavior, then generate network detection signatures. Use when reverse-engineering a captured malleable profile or building detections against Cobalt Strike Beacon traffic.

analyzing-command-and-control-communication

Analyzes malware C2 communication over HTTP, HTTPS, DNS, and custom

analyzing-cyber-kill-chain

Analyzes intrusion activity against the Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain

analyzing-disk-image-with-autopsy

Perform comprehensive forensic analysis of raw (dd), E01, or AFF disk images with Autopsy and The Sleuth Kit, recovering deleted files, examining metadata and embedded artifacts, keyword searching, and building investigation timelines with visual reports. Use for structured analysis of a forensic disk image or when stakeholders need visual reports from evidence.

analyzing-dns-logs-for-exfiltration

Analyzes DNS query logs to detect data exfiltration via DNS tunneling,

Skills associés