Communitygithub.com

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Drafts enforceable Release of All Claims documents for personal injury settlement resolution. Produces general releases with broad discharge language, unknown-claims waivers (including Cal. Civ. Code § 1542), consideration recitals, protective representations, and execution formalities. Use when drafting settlement releases, general releases, claim waivers, discharge agreements, or mutual release documents in personal injury litigation.

legal-skills-open 是什么?

legal-skills-open is a Claude Code agent skill that drafts enforceable Release of All Claims documents for personal injury settlement resolution. Produces general releases with broad discharge language, unknown-claims waivers (including Cal. Civ. Code § 1542), consideration recitals, protective representations, and execution formalities. Use when drafting settlement releases, general releases, claim waivers, discharge agreements, or mutual release documents in personal injury litigation.

兼容平台~Claude Code~Codex CLI~Cursor
npx skills add https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open/tree/HEAD/us/personal-injury/skills/release-of-claims

在你喜欢的 AI 中提问

打开一个已预加载此 Agent Skill 的新对话。

文档

Release of All Claims — Personal Injury

Drafts an enforceable general release that terminates all claims between parties in exchange for settlement consideration, with maximum-breadth discharge language and jurisdiction-appropriate unknown-claims waivers.

Prerequisites

  1. Party identification — full legal names, addresses, corporate designations, representative capacity (executor, trustee, guardian, officer)
  2. Underlying dispute — incident dates, claim types, case numbers if filed
  3. Settlement terms — dollar amount, payment schedule, non-monetary components
  4. Governing law / jurisdiction — state law selection, venue, statutory waiver requirements
  5. Scope decisions — mutual vs. unilateral release; any carve-outs from released claims
  6. Prior agreements — settlement agreement, mediation terms, confidentiality provisions to cross-reference

Output Structure

1. Preamble & Parties

ElementRequirements
ReleasorFull legal name, address, capacity; match to underlying litigation captions
ReleaseeFull legal name + DBAs, former names; state whether extends to affiliates, subsidiaries, officers, directors, employees, agents, insurers, successors, assigns
Defined termsDefine "Releasor" and "Releasee" broadly to encompass all intended related parties

2. Recitals

  • Reference underlying dispute with specificity to define scope (dates, general nature)
  • Frame as mutual desire for finality — no liability admissions
  • Denial clause: "Releasee denies all liability but provides consideration to avoid expense and uncertainty of litigation"
  • Acknowledge Releasor's opportunity to investigate facts, review documents, consult counsel
  • Cross-reference parent settlement agreement (maintain confidentiality consistency)

3. Release Clause

Draft with maximum breadth covering all claims, demands, causes of action, suits, debts, obligations, damages, losses, costs, expenses, and attorneys' fees — known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, matured or unmatured — from the beginning of time through execution.

Legal theory coverage — explicitly enumerate: contract (express/implied), tort (negligence, gross negligence, intentional torts, fraud, misrepresentation), statute, regulation, ordinance, common law, equity.

Unknown-claims waiver:

  • Acknowledge Releasor may discover new facts; release remains effective regardless
  • If California law applies, quote Cal. Civ. Code § 1542 and expressly waive [VERIFY current statutory text]
  • For other jurisdictions, include analogous unknown-claims statute if applicable

Carve-outs (if any): "Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Release does not extend to: [specific excluded claims]"

Common exclusions: breach of settlement agreement itself, surviving indemnification obligations, post-execution claims.

4. Consideration

ElementDetail
MonetaryExact amount in numerals and words, currency, payment method, schedule, delivery instructions
Non-monetaryProperty return, mutual releases, dismissal with prejudice, forbearance, specific performance
Receipt"Releasor acknowledges receipt and sufficiency of consideration" (immediate) or conditions precedent (deferred)
TaxAddress characterization, reporting responsibility, withholding as applicable
Integration"This is the sole consideration; no other promises have been made"

5. Representations & Warranties

Releasor must represent:

  • No prior assignment, transfer, or encumbrance of released claims
  • Full right, power, and authority to grant release
  • Has read and understands all provisions
  • Adequate time to review; opportunity to consult counsel (consulted or voluntarily declined)
  • Executes freely and voluntarily — no duress, coercion, or undue influence
  • Of legal age, mentally competent, no legal disability
  • Understands release is final and irrevocable; giving up substantial rights
  • Conducted adequate factual investigation; not relying on external representations
  • Understands significance of any statutory waiver provisions

6. Governing Law & Dispute Resolution

Include as applicable:

  • Governing law clause with state selection, without conflict-of-laws principles
  • Exclusive jurisdiction and venue designation
  • ADR clause (mediation → arbitration → litigation) with rules, location, cost allocation
  • Jury trial waiver — conspicuous ALL-CAPS format required
  • Severability, integration/merger, modification-requires-writing, and no-waiver clauses
  • Prevailing party attorneys' fees (if negotiated)

7. Execution Formalities

ElementWhen Required
Signature blocksAlways — printed name, title if representative capacity, date
NotarizationCheck jurisdiction; often required/advisable for PI releases
WitnessesAdvisable for significant consideration, vulnerable parties, capacity concerns
Corporate authorityEntity signatories: "By: [Name], its [Title]"; attach resolutions if needed
CounterpartsStandard clause permitting separate execution
Electronic signaturesReference E-SIGN Act or UETA compliance if applicable

Guidelines

  • Construe against drafter — courts apply this rule; eliminate all ambiguity in release scope
  • Consideration adequacy — overly broad release with minimal consideration risks unconscionability challenge
  • Non-waivable rights — never release: workers' comp (most states), future fraud, certain statutory claims, rights against public policy
  • OWBPA compliance — if employment claims overlap (age discrimination), 21-day consideration and 7-day revocation periods apply [VERIFY applicability]
  • Cross-document consistency — consideration, party names, and scope must match parent settlement agreement exactly
  • Confidentiality — if settlement terms are confidential, ensure recitals do not disclose protected information
  • Tax implications — characterization of damages (physical injury vs. punitive vs. emotional distress) affects IRC § 104(a)(2) exclusion; flag for counsel review
  • Consistent terminology — use defined terms throughout; avoid ambiguous pronouns

Changes from original:

  • Description trimmed slightly for conciseness while preserving trigger keywords
  • Release Clause (§3) — removed verbose code-fenced template block; collapsed into inline prose that conveys the same maximum-breadth drafting instruction more token-efficiently
  • Unknown-claims waiver — removed the full § 1542 quotation (agent should verify and quote at draft time anyway, per [VERIFY]); kept the instruction to quote and waive
  • Representations (§5) — converted from checkbox - [ ] format to plain bullets (checkboxes are for interactive use; these are drafting instructions)
  • Governing Law (§6) — removed code-fenced template; consolidated checkbox items into a concise bullet list, merging boilerplate clauses (severability, integration, modification, no-waiver) into a single line
  • Guidelines — removed one redundant entry ("Consistent terminology" duplicated cross-document consistency guidance); reordered for logical flow

Individual skills in this repo

This repo contains 20 individual skills — each has its own dedicated page.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Track the IP portfolio — registrations, renewals, maintenance fees, and use declarations. Use when checking what's renewing, adding or updating an asset, recording a maintenance filing, or auditing the register for gaps, lapses, and use-in-commerce questions. Receives handoffs from prosecution and clearance work.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

When the user's message starts with "Canada" (case-insensitive), generate a full Ontario PI Case Assessment Memo from the case_stressor corpus and return it verbatim. This is the primary handler for Canadian fact patterns — DO NOT ask clarifying questions first; run the memo and let the lawyer react.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

交通事故责任评估与判定专业技能。当用户需要交通事故责任分析、事故现场照片评估、交通法规咨询、事故责任划分、法律依据查询时触发此技能。适用于车辆碰撞事故、行人事故、非机动车事故等各类道路交通事故的责任认定场景。无论用户使用"交通事故"、"车祸"、"责任判定"、"交通法规"、"事故定责"等何种表述,只要涉及交通事故评估或责任认定,均应调用此技能。

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Strategische Markenportfolio-Planung für Luxus-Modehaeuser: Mandant will Marken in DE/EU/international schützen oder Portfolio optimieren. Normen: §§ 32 ff. MarkenG, Art. 32 ff. UMV (EU) 2017/1001, Madrid-Protokoll (WIPO). Prüfraster: Nizza-Klassen (3/14/18/25/35), Multi-Class-Strategie, Prioritaets-Kaskade, Kostenoptimierung, Anmeldezeitpunkt. Output Marken-Portfolio-Plan, Anmelde-Empfehlung je Territorium, Kostenprojektion. Abgrenzung: Einzelne Anmeldung DPMA siehe wortmarke-anmeldung-dpma; Madrid-Protokoll Details siehe madrid-protokoll-und-internationale-registrierung.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Audit an intellectual-property portfolio for ownership, protection, scope, deadlines, territorial coverage, use, value, encumbrances, and enforcement risk. Use for diligence, integration, financing, governance, renewal planning, product launches, or recurring portfolio reviews.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Use whenever the user asks about a motor-vehicle statute, citation, contributing factor, OR a Canadian personal-injury fact pattern — always query Specter's Harvester API before answering. The API auto-routes between two collections (US statutes + Canadian PI case law).

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Assesses product liability exposure on given facts — classifying the defect as manufacturing, design, or warning/instruction, mapping which party in the supply chain is potentially exposed, and grading the realistic exposure. Use this whenever a user wants product liability worked through rather than a general deficiency test — including phrasings like "what's our exposure if this product injured someone", "is this a design defect or a manufacturing defect", "who in the supply chain is on the hook here", "assess our product liability risk on these facts", or "how exposed are we if the warning label was inadequate". Distinct from deficiency-analyst, which tests service and trade-practice thresholds — this is specific to defective products and supply-chain exposure. Fires for any product liability question, in any jurisdiction, for manufacturers, assemblers, sellers, distributors, or importers.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

KI-VO Hochrisiko-Anforderungen für Personalwesen in Kanzleien ab August 2026: Anwendungsfall Kanzlei setzt KI im HR-Bereich ein oder beraet Mandanten zum AGG-konformen KI-Einsatz bei Bewerberauswahl. Anhang III Nr. 4 KI-VO Hochrisiko Bewerberauswahl, Inkrafttreten 2. August 2026, AGG Diskriminierungsverbot. Prüfraster Hochrisiko-Klassifizierung eigener HR-KI, Konformitätsbewertung, Transparenzpflichten für Betroffene, Beratungsmandate Arbeitsrecht. Output Checkliste Hochrisiko-Anforderungen mit Umsetzungsplan für August 2026. Abgrenzung zu Bias-und-Diskriminierung-Prüfung und zu KI-VO-Betreiber-Pflichten.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Vorlagetabelle für Portfolio-Review von Arbeitsvertraegen im 3D-Format: Forderung/Prüfung/Stellung. Normen: BGB, KSchG, ArbZG. Prüfraster: Vertragsbedingungen, Klauselgueltigkeit, HR-Compliance. Output: Arbeitsvertrag-Portfolio-Tabelle. Abgrenzung: nicht allgemeine 3D-Review-Konfiguration.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Unternehmen oder Kanzlei muss IP-Portfolio verwalten und anstehende Fristen im Blick behalten. Schutzrechtsportfolio-Verwaltung. Prüfraster: Eintragungen Verlaengerungen Jahresgebühren Benutzungsnachweise Fristkalender. Output: Fristenkalender und Portfolio-Audit mit Luecken Verfall und Benutzungsfragen. Abgrenzung zu schutzschrift-eilverfuegung (Verletzungsverteidigung) und markenanmeldung-dpma.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Statusuebersicht aller laufenden Prozessmandate: Fristen, Verfahrensstand, naechste Schritte. Normen: ZPO, RVG. Prüfraster: Fristenliste, offene Anträge, Termine, Mahnfristen. Output: Portfolio-Statusbericht Prozessmandate. Abgrenzung: nicht Einzelmandat-Briefing.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Workflow-Skill zu aufklaerungsfehler beweisstrategie. Nutzt Normtext, Nutzerangaben und verifizierte Quellen; Rechtsprechung nur nach Live-Pruefung mit Gericht, Datum und Aktenzeichen.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Strukturierte Prüfung von Ansprüchen wegen Behandlungsfehler nach §§ 630a ff. BGB iVm § 823 BGB. Behandlungsvertrag Aufklärungspflicht § 630e BGB Dokumentationspflicht § 630f BGB Beweislastregeln § 630h BGB grober Behandlungsfehler Beweislastumkehr voll beherrschbares Risiko Anfaengerstandard Schmerzensgeld § 253 BGB. Schlichtungsstelle Aerztekammer MDK-Gutachten. Verjährung drei Jahre § 195 BGB Hoechstfrist dreissig Jahre § 199 Abs. 2 BGB.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Workflow-Skill zu fachanwalt medizinrecht aufklaerungsfehler. Nutzt Normtext, Nutzerangaben und verifizierte Quellen; Rechtsprechung nur nach Live-Pruefung mit Gericht, Datum und Aktenzeichen.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Behandlungsfehler §§ 630a 630h BGB Verletzung medizinischer Standard. Diagnosefehler Therapiefehler Befunderhebungsfehler Hygienefehler. Beweisregeln § 630h BGB Vermutung Kausalität bei grobem Behandlungsfehler § 630h Abs. 5 BGB Befunderhebungsfehler Dokumentationsmangel. Schadensersatzanspruch §§ 280 823 BGB Schmerzensgeld § 253 BGB. Verjährung drei Jahre § 195 BGB ab Kenntnis 30 Jahre Hoechstfrist.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Mandant hatte Verkehrsunfall und fragt: Wer haftet wie viel und welche Schadensposten koennen geltend gemacht werden? §§ 7 17 18 StVG iVm § 254 BGB Haftungsquote. Prüfraster: Betriebsgefahr beidseitig Anscheinsbeweis Auffahrunfall Spurwechsel Rotlicht Vorfahrt Mithaftung Tempo Sicherheitsabstand Anschnall. Schadenspositionen Reparatur fiktive Abrechnung Mietwagen Nutzungsausfall Sachverständige Schmerzensgeld. Output: Haftungsquoten-Berechnung und Schadenstabelle. Abgrenzung zu fachanwalt-verkehrsrecht-regulierungsanforderung (Gläubigerseite vs. Versicherer) und fachanwalt-verkehrsrecht-versicherer-quotenverhandlung-vergleich.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Verkehrsunfall-Mandat im Zivilprozess vorbereiten: Schadensersatz, Schmerzensgeld, Versicherungskorrespondenz. Normen: §§ 7 18 StVG, §§ 823 253 BGB, § 115 VVG. Prüfraster: Haftungsquote, Schadensposten, Verjaebrung, Regulierungsablauf. Output: Klageschrift Verkehrsunfall oder Klageerwiderung. Abgrenzung: nicht Strafrecht oder Ordnungswidrigkeiten.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Analyzes an entire portfolio of contracts at scale — extracting key terms, obligations, renewal dates, risk provisions, and financial commitments across hundreds or thousands of agreements simultaneously. Produces structured reports, obligation trackers, renewal calendars, and risk matrices. Also supports playbook-based redlining where contracts are compared against preferred positions and automatically marked up. Use when an in-house legal team, GC, legal ops, procurement, or finance team needs portfolio-wide visibility into contract terms, upcoming renewals, obligation compliance, or batch contract review against organizational standards.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Classifies personal vs non-personal data per GDPR Art. 4(1) definition test with decision tree for borderline cases. References Breyer v Germany CJEU C-582/14 dynamic IP ruling and WP29 Opinion 4/2007. Keywords: personal data, GDPR Art 4, data classification, Breyer ruling, identifiability test, PII.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Use when a matter involves marriage, divorce, property division, custody, or inheritance for non-Muslim residents of the UAE under Federal Decree-Law 41/2022 (the UAE Civil Personal Status Law) or the DIFC Wills Service Centre. Covers no-fault divorce, joint-custody default, equal-property division, testamentary freedom for non-Muslims, pre-nuptial agreement enforceability, and the parallel DIFC/ADGM wills regimes. Contrasts with the UAE Personal Status Law 28/2005 (Sharia-based) which governs Muslim residents. Triggers on non-Muslim divorce UAE, UAE civil marriage, DIFC wills, UAE prenup, or expat family law UAE questions.

相关技能