Communitygithub.com

mailtrap-email-integration

Guides agents through integrating transactional email sending via Mailtrap

mailtrap-email-integration 是什麼?

mailtrap-email-integration is a Claude Code agent skill that guides agents through integrating transactional email sending via Mailtrap.

相容平台~Claude Code~Codex CLI~Cursor
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/everything-claude-code/tree/main/skills/mailtrap-email-integration

在你喜歡的 AI 中提問

開啟一個已預先載入此 Agent Skill 的新對話。

說明文件

Mailtrap Email Integration

Patterns for adding transactional email sending to an application using Mailtrap's Email API and Sandbox, covering authentication, environment separation, and common delivery pitfalls.

When to Activate

  • Implementing a "send email" feature (signup confirmation, password reset, notifications, receipts)
  • Debugging why emails aren't arriving in dev/staging
  • Setting up a project's first email-sending integration
  • Reviewing code that calls an email API directly without sandbox separation

Core Concepts

Sandbox vs. Production separation. Mailtrap provides a Sandbox API that captures emails without delivering them, used for dev/staging so test emails never reach real inboxes. Production sending uses a separate, verified-domain endpoint. Never point a dev environment at the production sending endpoint.

Authentication. Requests use a Bearer token in the Authorization header. Tokens are scoped per project; sandbox and production typically use different tokens.

Domain verification. Production sending requires verifying a sending domain via DNS records (SPF, DKIM, DMARC) before Mailtrap will deliver to real recipients. Skipping this causes silent delivery failures or spam-folder placement.

Code Examples

// Sending via Mailtrap's Email API (production)
async function sendEmail(to: string, subject: string, html: string) {
  const response = await fetch("https://send.api.mailtrap.io/api/send", {
    method: "POST",
    headers: {
      "Authorization": `Bearer ${process.env.MAILTRAP_API_TOKEN}`,
      "Content-Type": "application/json",
    },
    body: JSON.stringify({
      from: { email: "[email protected]", name: "Your App" },
      to: [{ email: to }],
      subject,
      html,
    }),
  });

  if (!response.ok) {
    throw new Error(`Email send failed: ${response.status}`);
  }
  return response.json();
}
// Same call, routed to Sandbox in non-production environments
const MAILTRAP_ENDPOINT = process.env.NODE_ENV === "production"
  ? "https://send.api.mailtrap.io/api/send"
  : `https://sandbox.api.mailtrap.io/api/send/${process.env.MAILTRAP_INBOX_ID}`;

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternWhy It's a ProblemInstead
Using the production sending endpoint in dev/testReal test emails reach real inboxes, risking spam complaints and leaked test dataRoute non-production environments to the Sandbox endpoint
Hardcoding API tokens in sourceCredential leak risk if committed to version controlLoad tokens from environment variables / secrets manager
Sending before domain verification completesEmails silently fail or land in spamVerify SPF/DKIM/DMARC records before enabling production sending
No retry/error handling on send failuresSilent notification failures (e.g., user never gets password reset email)Check response status, log failures, surface actionable errors

Best Practices

  • Keep sandbox and production tokens in separate environment variables, never share one token across environments
  • Verify sending domain DNS records before any production launch involving email
  • Log delivery failures with enough context to debug (recipient, template, timestamp, response code)
  • Treat email sending as a fallible network call: wrap in try/catch, never assume success

Related Skills

api-and-interface-design, security-and-hardening, ci-cd-and-automation

Individual skills in this repo

This repo contains 20 individual skills — each has its own dedicated page.

accessibility

Design, implement, and audit inclusive digital products using WCAG 2.2 Level AA. Use when building or auditing UI that must meet WCAG 2.2 Level AA, or when reviewing a change for keyboard, contrast, or screen-reader support.

affaan-m/claude-api

Anthropic Claude API patterns for Python and TypeScript. Covers Messages API, streaming, tool use, vision, extended thinking, batches, prompt caching, and Claude Agent SDK. Use when building applications with the Claude API or Anthropic SDKs.

affaan-m/everything-claude-code

Development conventions and patterns for everything-claude-code. JavaScript project with conventional commits.

affaan-m/everything-claude-code-conventions

Development conventions and patterns for everything-claude-code. JavaScript project with conventional commits.

affaan-m/frontend-design

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications and the visual direction matters as much as the code quality.

affaan-m/gget

gget CLI and Python workflow for quick genomic database queries, sequence lookup, BLAST-style searches, enrichment checks, and reproducible bioinformatics evidence logs.

affaan-m/literature-review

Systematic literature-review workflow for academic, biomedical, technical, and scientific topics, including search planning, source screening, synthesis, citation checks, and evidence logging.

affaan-m/motion-ui

Production-ready UI motion system for React/Next.js. Use when implementing animations, transitions, or motion patterns.

affaan-m/project-guidelines-example

Example project-specific skill template based on a real production application.

affaan-m/pubmed-database

Direct PubMed and NCBI E-utilities search workflows for biomedical literature, MeSH queries, PMID lookup, citation retrieval, and API-backed literature monitoring.

affaan-m/scholar-evaluation

Structured scholarly-work evaluation for papers, proposals, literature reviews, methods sections, evidence quality, citation support, and research-writing feedback.

affaan-m/uspto-database

USPTO patent and trademark data workflow for official record lookup, PatentSearch queries, TSDR checks, assignment data, and reproducible IP research logs.

agent-architecture-audit

Full-stack diagnostic for agent and LLM applications. Audits the 12-layer agent stack for wrapper regression, memory pollution, tool discipline failures, hidden repair loops, and rendering corruption. Produces severity-ranked findings with code-first fixes. Essential for developers building agent applications, autonomous loops, or any LLM-powered feature. Use when an agent or LLM feature misbehaves and the failing layer is unknown, or before shipping an agent stack.

agent-eval

Head-to-head comparison of coding agents (Claude Code, Aider, Codex, etc.) on custom tasks with pass rate, cost, time, and consistency metrics. Use when choosing between coding agents, or when a change to an agent setup needs measured pass rate, cost, and time rather than an impression.

agent-harness-construction

Design and optimize AI agent action spaces, tool definitions, and observation formatting for higher completion rates. Use when defining or revising an agent

agentic-engineering

Operate as an agentic engineer using eval-first execution, decomposition, and cost-aware model routing. Use when planning or executing engineering work that agents will carry out end to end.

agentic-os

Build persistent multi-agent operating systems on Claude Code. Covers kernel architecture, specialist agents, slash commands, file-based memory, scheduled automation, and state management without external databases. Use when building a persistent multi-agent system on Claude Code with its own memory, commands, and scheduling.

agent-introspection-debugging

Structured self-debugging workflow for AI agent failures using capture, diagnosis, contained recovery, and introspection reports. Use when an agent run fails and you need a reproducible diagnosis instead of a retry.

agent-payment-x402

Add x402 payment execution to AI agents with per-task budgets, spending controls, and non-custodial wallets. Supports Base through agentwallet-sdk and X Layer through OKX Payments / OKX Agent Payments Protocol. Use when an agent must pay for something itself and needs per-task budgets, spending controls, and a non-custodial wallet.

agent-self-evaluation

Use after completing any non-trivial task. The agent self-rates its output on 5 axes — accuracy, completeness, clarity, actionability, conciseness — with concrete evidence per criterion. Produces a structured 1-5 scorecard with specific improvement suggestions.

相關技能