Communitygithub.com

分析惡意軟體中的網路隱蔽通道

偵測並分析惡意軟體所使用的隱蔽通訊通道,包含 DNS 隧道、ICMP 隧道及 HTTP 隱蔽通道。

分析惡意軟體中的網路隱蔽通道 是什麼?

這項技能專門針對惡意軟體中的網路隱蔽通道進行分析,涵蓋 DNS 隧道、ICMP 隧道及 HTTP 隱蔽通道等技術。它適合用於資安事件調查、建立偵測規則、威脅狩獵查詢,以及驗證安全監控覆蓋範圍。支援的平台包含 Python 3.9+(搭配 Scapy、dpkt、dnslib 等套件)、Wireshark/tshark、Zeek 網路監控工具,以及 DNS 查詢日誌基礎設施。技能提供完整的 Python 程式碼範例,可自動偵測 DNS 隧道(透過子網域長度、熵值與查詢量分析)與 ICMP 隧道(透過酬載大小異常),並根據多項指標評分篩選出可疑域。最後會產出結構化的分析報告,並附上驗證標準與參考資料。

相容平台~Claude Code~Codex CLI~Cursor
npx skills add https://github.com/mukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills/tree/main/skills/analyzing-network-covert-channels-in-malware

在你喜歡的 AI 中提問

開啟一個已預先載入此 Agent Skill 的新對話。

說明文件

分析惡意軟體中的網路隱蔽通道 是做什麼的?

概述

惡意軟體利用隱蔽通道將 C2 通訊和資料外洩偽裝成看似正常的網路流量。DNS 隧道將資料編碼在 DNS 查詢和回應中(如 iodine、dnscat2 等工具,以及 FrameworkPOS 等惡意軟體家族)。ICMP 隧道將資料隱藏在 Echo 請求和回應的酬載中(如 icmpsh、ptunnel)。HTTP 隱蔽通道則將 C2 資料嵌入 Header、Cookie 或圖像隱寫術中。協定濫用則利用允許的協定繞過防火牆。基於現代機器學習的方法可達到 99% 以上的 DNS 隧道偵測召回率,但低吞吐量的資料外洩仍然難以偵測。Palo Alto Unit42 在 2024 年追蹤了三起重大 DNS 隧道攻擊活動(TrkCdn、SecShow、Savvy Seahorse),顯示此技術仍持續盛行。

使用時機

  • 調查涉及分析惡意軟體網路隱蔽通道的資安事件時
  • 為此領域建立偵測規則或威脅狩獵查詢時
  • SOC 分析師需要此類分析的結構化程序時
  • 驗證相關攻擊技術的安全監控覆蓋範圍時

前置需求

  • Python 3.9+ 並安裝 scapy、dpkt、dnslib 套件
  • Wireshark/tshark 用於 PCAP 分析
  • Zeek(原名 Bro)用於網路監控
  • DNS 查詢日誌基礎設施
  • 了解 DNS、ICMP、HTTP 協定的封包層級運作

工作流程

步驟 1:DNS 隧道偵測

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Detect DNS tunneling and covert channels in network traffic."""
import sys
import json
import math
from collections import Counter, defaultdict

try:
    from scapy.all import rdpcap, DNS, DNSQR, DNSRR, IP, ICMP
except ImportError:
    print("pip install scapy")
    sys.exit(1)


def entropy(data):
    if not data:
        return 0
    freq = Counter(data)
    length = len(data)
    return -sum((c/length) * math.log2(c/length) for c in freq.values())


def analyze_dns_tunneling(pcap_path):
    """Detect DNS tunneling indicators in PCAP."""
    packets = rdpcap(pcap_path)
    domain_stats = defaultdict(lambda: {
        "queries": 0, "total_qname_len": 0, "subdomain_lengths": [],
        "query_types": Counter(), "unique_subdomains": set(),
    })

    for pkt in packets:
        if pkt.haslayer(DNS) and pkt.haslayer(DNSQR):
            qname = pkt[DNSQR].qname.decode('utf-8', errors='replace').rstrip('.')
            qtype = pkt[DNSQR].qtype

            parts = qname.split('.')
            if len(parts) >= 3:
                base_domain = '.'.join(parts[-2:])
                subdomain = '.'.join(parts[:-2])

                stats = domain_stats[base_domain]
                stats["queries"] += 1
                stats["total_qname_len"] += len(qname)
                stats["subdomain_lengths"].append(len(subdomain))
                stats["query_types"][qtype] += 1
                stats["unique_subdomains"].add(subdomain)

    # Score domains for tunneling indicators
    suspicious = []
    for domain, stats in domain_stats.items():
        if stats["queries"] < 5:
            continue

        avg_subdomain_len = (sum(stats["subdomain_lengths"]) /
                             len(stats["subdomain_lengths"]))
        unique_ratio = len(stats["unique_subdomains"]) / stats["queries"]

        # Calculate subdomain entropy
        all_subdomains = ''.join(stats["unique_subdomains"])
        sub_entropy = entropy(all_subdomains)

        score = 0
        reasons = []

        if avg_subdomain_len > 30:
            score += 30
            reasons.append(f"Long subdomains (avg {avg_subdomain_len:.0f} chars)")
        if unique_ratio > 0.9:
            score += 25
            reasons.append(f"High uniqueness ({unique_ratio:.2%})")
        if sub_entropy > 4.0:
            score += 25
            reasons.append(f"High entropy ({sub_entropy:.2f})")
        if stats["query_types"].get(16, 0) > 10:  # TXT records
            score += 20
            reasons.append(f"Many TXT queries ({stats['query_types'][16]})")

        if score >= 50:
            suspicious.append({
                "domain": domain,
                "score": score,
                "queries": stats["queries"],
                "avg_subdomain_length": round(avg_subdomain_len, 1),
                "unique_subdomains": len(stats["unique_subdomains"]),
                "subdomain_entropy": round(sub_entropy, 2),
                "reasons": reasons,
            })

    return sorted(suspicious, key=lambda x: -x["score"])


def analyze_icmp_tunneling(pcap_path):
    """Detect ICMP tunneling in PCAP."""
    packets = rdpcap(pcap_path)
    icmp_stats = defaultdict(lambda: {"count": 0, "payload_sizes": [], "payloads": []})

    for pkt in packets:
        if pkt.haslayer(ICMP) and pkt.haslayer(IP):
            src = pkt[IP].src
            dst = pkt[IP].dst
            key = f"{src}->{dst}"

            payload = bytes(pkt[ICMP].payload)
            icmp_stats[key]["count"] += 1
            icmp_stats[key]["payload_sizes"].append(len(payload))
            if len(payload) > 64:
                icmp_stats[key]["payloads"].append(payload[:100])

    suspicious = []
    for flow, stats in icmp_stats.items():
        if stats["count"] < 5:
            continue
        avg_size = sum(stats["payload_sizes"]) / len(stats["payload_sizes"])
        if avg_size > 64 or stats["count"] > 100:
            suspicious.append({
                "flow": flow,
                "packets": stats["count"],
                "avg_payload_size": round(avg_size, 1),
                "reason": "Large/frequent ICMP payloads suggest tunneling",
            })

    return suspicious


if __name__ == "__main__":
    if len(sys.argv) < 2:
        print(f"Usage: {sys.argv[0]} <pcap_file>")
        sys.exit(1)

    print("[+] DNS Tunneling Analysis")
    dns_results = analyze_dns_tunneling(sys.argv[1])
    for r in dns_results:
        print(f"  {r['domain']} (score: {r['score']})")
        for reason in r['reasons']:
            print(f"    - {reason}")

    print("\n[+] ICMP Tunneling Analysis")
    icmp_results = analyze_icmp_tunneling(sys.argv[1])
    for r in icmp_results:
        print(f"  {r['flow']}: {r['reason']}")

驗證標準

  • 透過熵值、子網域長度和查詢量分析偵測 DNS 隧道
  • 透過酬載大小異常識別 ICMP 隱蔽通道
  • 區分隧道域與合法的 CDN/雲端流量
  • 從捕獲的流量估算資料外洩量
  • 提取 C2 通訊模式與信標發送間隔

參考資料

Individual skills in this repo

This repo contains 20 individual skills — each has its own dedicated page.

abusing-dpapi-for-credential-access

Extract and decrypt Windows DPAPI-protected secrets (Credential Manager, browser logins/cookies, Wi-Fi credentials, KeePass keys) online or offline using SharpDPAPI, SharpChrome, Mimikatz, or Impacket

abusing-shadow-credentials-for-privesc

Take over Active Directory accounts by writing attacker-controlled public keys to msDS-KeyCredentialLink (Shadow Credentials) with pyWhisker, Whisker, or Certipy, then authenticate via PKINIT to recover the target

achieving-cmmc-level-2-compliance

>-

acquiring-disk-image-with-dd-and-dcfldd

Create forensically sound bit-for-bit disk images with dd or dcfldd on a Linux forensic workstation, preserving evidence integrity through hash verification (MD5/SHA) during acquisition. Use when imaging a suspect drive, USB device, or memory card for investigation, preserving volatile disk evidence during incident response, or producing a verified copy for legal or law-enforcement proceedings before any destructive analysis.

analyzing-active-directory-acl-abuse

Detect dangerous ACL misconfigurations in Active Directory using ldap3

analyzing-android-malware-with-apktool

Perform static analysis of Android APK malware using apktool for resource decompilation, jadx for Java source recovery, and androguard for manifest inspection, dangerous permission-combination detection, and identification of obfuscated code, dynamic code loading, and reflection-based API calls. Use to statically triage a suspicious APK without executing it or to build mobile malware detection rules.

analyzing-api-gateway-access-logs

Parses API Gateway access logs (AWS API Gateway, Kong, Nginx) to detect

analyzing-apt-group-with-mitre-navigator

Query ATT&CK data with attackcti, mitreattack-python, and stix2, then build MITRE ATT&CK Navigator layers and multi-layer heatmap overlays mapping one or more APT groups

analyzing-azure-activity-logs-for-threats

Queries Azure Monitor activity logs and sign-in logs via azure-monitor-query

analyzing-bootkit-and-rootkit-samples

Analyzes bootkit and advanced rootkit malware infecting the Master

analyzing-browser-forensics-with-hindsight

Parse Chromium-based browser databases with Hindsight to extract and correlate browsing history, downloads, cookies, cached content, autofill data, saved passwords, and extensions from Chrome, Edge, Brave, Opera, and Vivaldi into a unified timeline (XLSX, JSON, or SQLite output). Use during incident response, insider-threat investigations, or criminal cases when you need to reconstruct a user

analyzing-campaign-attribution-evidence

Systematically evaluate cyber-campaign evidence to attribute an operation to a threat actor, using the Diamond Model and Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) to weigh infrastructure overlaps, TTP consistency, malware code similarity, and timing/language artifacts into confidence-weighted attribution assessments. Use when an incident investigation needs a defensible attribution confidence level.

analyzing-certificate-transparency-for-phishing

Monitor Certificate Transparency logs using crt.sh and Certstream to

analyzing-cloud-storage-access-patterns

Detect abnormal access in AWS S3, GCS, and Azure Blob Storage by analyzing CloudTrail Data Events, GCS audit logs, and Azure Storage Analytics for after-hours bulk downloads, new-IP access, and API-call spikes (e.g. GetObject) via statistical baselines and time-series anomaly detection. Use when investigating suspected cloud data exfiltration or building related detection rules.

analyzing-cobalt-strike-beacon-configuration

Extract and analyze Cobalt Strike beacon configuration from PE files

analyzing-cobaltstrike-malleable-c2-profiles

Parse and analyze Cobalt Strike Malleable C2 profiles with dissect.cobaltstrike (profiles and beacon-payload configs) and pyMalleableC2 (AST parsing) to extract HTTP/DNS transforms, URIs, headers, sleep/jitter, and injection behavior, then generate network detection signatures. Use when reverse-engineering a captured malleable profile or building detections against Cobalt Strike Beacon traffic.

analyzing-command-and-control-communication

Analyzes malware C2 communication over HTTP, HTTPS, DNS, and custom

analyzing-cyber-kill-chain

Analyzes intrusion activity against the Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain

analyzing-disk-image-with-autopsy

Perform comprehensive forensic analysis of raw (dd), E01, or AFF disk images with Autopsy and The Sleuth Kit, recovering deleted files, examining metadata and embedded artifacts, keyword searching, and building investigation timelines with visual reports. Use for structured analysis of a forensic disk image or when stakeholders need visual reports from evidence.

analyzing-dns-logs-for-exfiltration

Analyzes DNS query logs to detect data exfiltration via DNS tunneling,

相關技能