Communitygithub.com

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Generates litigation-ready narrative medical treatment summaries for personal injury cases. Triggers when summarizing medical records, preparing demand packages, drafting treatment narratives, or building medical damages presentations for settlement or trial.

O que é legal-skills-open?

legal-skills-open is a Claude Code agent skill that generates litigation-ready narrative medical treatment summaries for personal injury cases. Triggers when summarizing medical records, preparing demand packages, drafting treatment narratives, or building medical damages presentations for settlement or trial.

Funciona com~Claude Code~Codex CLI~Cursor
npx skills add https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open/tree/HEAD/general/personal-injury/skills/medical-treatment-summary

Perguntar na sua IA favorita

Abre um novo chat com esta habilidade de agente já pré-carregada.

Documentação

Medical Treatment Summary

Transforms medical records into persuasive, clinically accurate narratives that establish a damages foundation for personal injury litigation.

Prerequisites

  • Medical records — ER reports, physician notes, imaging, operative reports, therapy/pharmacy records
  • Pre-incident history — prior treatment records, PCP notes establishing baseline
  • Incident documentation — accident/police reports, engineering analyses
  • Employment/vocational records — personnel files, vocational assessments
  • Mental health records — psychiatric evaluations, therapy notes (if applicable)
  • Expert reports — IMEs, FCEs, life care plans (if available)

Quick Start

  1. Gather all available records from the prerequisite categories.
  2. Establish the pre-incident baseline with specifics (duties, hobbies, hours, capacity).
  3. Map the incident mechanism to specific diagnoses.
  4. Organize the treatment course thematically by intervention type and escalation.
  5. Translate clinical findings into real-world functional impact.
  6. Build the causation chain: incident → injury → treatment → impairment.
  7. Synthesize damages foundation with cited evidence.

Output Structure

Target length: 8–20 pages depending on treatment complexity.

Sections

SectionPurposeKey Sources
Pre-Incident BaselineEstablish prior functional capacityHistorical records, employment, activity docs
Incident & Immediate PresentationLink mechanism to injuriesAccident reports, ER records, initial imaging
Treatment CourseShow logical care progressionAll treatment records, pharmacy records
Functional ImpactTranslate findings to life disruptionTherapy notes, FCEs, ADL assessments, vocational reports
Current Status & PrognosisEstablish permanence and future needsRecent evaluations, IMEs, treating physician opinions
CausationConnect incident to impairmentCausation statements, imaging comparisons
Damages FoundationSynthesize for economic/non-economic recoveryBilling records, life care plans, expert reports

Section Guidance

Pre-Incident Baseline

  • Quantify: specific occupational duties, recreational activities, family roles, hours worked, physical demands
  • Acknowledge pre-existing conditions transparently; contrast pre/post-incident utilization patterns

Incident Mechanism & Immediate Presentation

  • Detail forces, direction, body mechanics → connect to specific diagnoses
  • For delayed presentation: cite provider notes linking symptoms to trauma with medical basis for delayed onset

Treatment Course

Organize thematically by escalation, not just chronologically:

  1. Conservative care — PT, chiropractic, activity modification
  2. Pharmaceutical management — document escalation pathway (OTC → Rx NSAID → opioid → nerve pain meds), side effects, effectiveness
  3. Interventional procedures — injections, nerve blocks; session count, response duration
  4. Surgical intervention — document decision pathway: conservative failures → diagnostic confirmation → procedure details → post-op outcomes

For each intervention: state clinical rationale, objective effectiveness measures, and why escalation was necessary.

Functional Impact

  • Convert clinical measurements to real-world consequences (e.g., "30° cervical rotation vs. normal 80°" → cannot check blind spots driving)
  • Document ADL limitations with specifics from therapy/OT records
  • Vocational impact: lost time, job modifications, reduced earnings, career trajectory changes
  • Psychological consequences: diagnoses, severity scores, connection to physical injuries

Current Status & Prognosis

  • MMI status and basis for determination
  • Ongoing treatment frequency, projected annual and lifetime costs
  • Synthesize provider opinions; address divergent IME opinions against objective evidence
  • Future deterioration risk (e.g., adjacent segment disease post-fusion)

Causation Framework

  • Cite provider language: "consistent with," "caused by," "directly related to"
  • Establish temporal relationship: no prior complaints → immediate post-incident symptoms
  • Pre-existing condition strategy: compare pre/post imaging, distinguish degenerative from traumatic pathology, apply aggravation doctrine
  • Preemptively address alternative causation using treatment continuity

Damages Foundation

  • Past medical expenses documented
  • Future treatment needs quantified
  • Lost earning capacity via vocational evidence
  • Non-economic damages supported by specific documented examples, not hyperbole

Citation Format

Integrate citations into prose with provider name, date of service, and document type:

"Dr. Sarah Martinez's orthopedic evaluation on March 15, 2024, documented severe cervical spine tenderness, muscle spasm, and restricted range of motion limited to thirty degrees of rotation."

Pitfalls and Checks

  • Tone: Advocate credibly — let documented facts speak; no inflammatory language or exaggeration
  • Medical necessity: Justify every significant intervention against clinical guidelines and standard of care
  • Treatment gaps: Address proactively — explain whether medically appropriate, logistically necessary, or caused by access barriers
  • Pre-existing conditions: Never conceal; frame as manageable baseline vs. post-incident debilitation using eggshell plaintiff / aggravation doctrine
  • No legal conclusions: Establish factual foundation without crossing into legal argument
  • Expert alignment: Ensure narrative supports opinions your experts will offer
  • Defense scrutiny: Every causal assertion must be supportable by cited medical evidence
  • Expense reasonableness: Connect costs to procedure complexity, specialist expertise, facility type, geographic market rates

Individual skills in this repo

This repo contains 20 individual skills — each has its own dedicated page.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Track the IP portfolio — registrations, renewals, maintenance fees, and use declarations. Use when checking what's renewing, adding or updating an asset, recording a maintenance filing, or auditing the register for gaps, lapses, and use-in-commerce questions. Receives handoffs from prosecution and clearance work.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

When the user's message starts with "Canada" (case-insensitive), generate a full Ontario PI Case Assessment Memo from the case_stressor corpus and return it verbatim. This is the primary handler for Canadian fact patterns — DO NOT ask clarifying questions first; run the memo and let the lawyer react.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

交通事故责任评估与判定专业技能。当用户需要交通事故责任分析、事故现场照片评估、交通法规咨询、事故责任划分、法律依据查询时触发此技能。适用于车辆碰撞事故、行人事故、非机动车事故等各类道路交通事故的责任认定场景。无论用户使用"交通事故"、"车祸"、"责任判定"、"交通法规"、"事故定责"等何种表述,只要涉及交通事故评估或责任认定,均应调用此技能。

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Strategische Markenportfolio-Planung für Luxus-Modehaeuser: Mandant will Marken in DE/EU/international schützen oder Portfolio optimieren. Normen: §§ 32 ff. MarkenG, Art. 32 ff. UMV (EU) 2017/1001, Madrid-Protokoll (WIPO). Prüfraster: Nizza-Klassen (3/14/18/25/35), Multi-Class-Strategie, Prioritaets-Kaskade, Kostenoptimierung, Anmeldezeitpunkt. Output Marken-Portfolio-Plan, Anmelde-Empfehlung je Territorium, Kostenprojektion. Abgrenzung: Einzelne Anmeldung DPMA siehe wortmarke-anmeldung-dpma; Madrid-Protokoll Details siehe madrid-protokoll-und-internationale-registrierung.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Audit an intellectual-property portfolio for ownership, protection, scope, deadlines, territorial coverage, use, value, encumbrances, and enforcement risk. Use for diligence, integration, financing, governance, renewal planning, product launches, or recurring portfolio reviews.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Use whenever the user asks about a motor-vehicle statute, citation, contributing factor, OR a Canadian personal-injury fact pattern — always query Specter's Harvester API before answering. The API auto-routes between two collections (US statutes + Canadian PI case law).

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Assesses product liability exposure on given facts — classifying the defect as manufacturing, design, or warning/instruction, mapping which party in the supply chain is potentially exposed, and grading the realistic exposure. Use this whenever a user wants product liability worked through rather than a general deficiency test — including phrasings like "what's our exposure if this product injured someone", "is this a design defect or a manufacturing defect", "who in the supply chain is on the hook here", "assess our product liability risk on these facts", or "how exposed are we if the warning label was inadequate". Distinct from deficiency-analyst, which tests service and trade-practice thresholds — this is specific to defective products and supply-chain exposure. Fires for any product liability question, in any jurisdiction, for manufacturers, assemblers, sellers, distributors, or importers.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

KI-VO Hochrisiko-Anforderungen für Personalwesen in Kanzleien ab August 2026: Anwendungsfall Kanzlei setzt KI im HR-Bereich ein oder beraet Mandanten zum AGG-konformen KI-Einsatz bei Bewerberauswahl. Anhang III Nr. 4 KI-VO Hochrisiko Bewerberauswahl, Inkrafttreten 2. August 2026, AGG Diskriminierungsverbot. Prüfraster Hochrisiko-Klassifizierung eigener HR-KI, Konformitätsbewertung, Transparenzpflichten für Betroffene, Beratungsmandate Arbeitsrecht. Output Checkliste Hochrisiko-Anforderungen mit Umsetzungsplan für August 2026. Abgrenzung zu Bias-und-Diskriminierung-Prüfung und zu KI-VO-Betreiber-Pflichten.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Vorlagetabelle für Portfolio-Review von Arbeitsvertraegen im 3D-Format: Forderung/Prüfung/Stellung. Normen: BGB, KSchG, ArbZG. Prüfraster: Vertragsbedingungen, Klauselgueltigkeit, HR-Compliance. Output: Arbeitsvertrag-Portfolio-Tabelle. Abgrenzung: nicht allgemeine 3D-Review-Konfiguration.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Unternehmen oder Kanzlei muss IP-Portfolio verwalten und anstehende Fristen im Blick behalten. Schutzrechtsportfolio-Verwaltung. Prüfraster: Eintragungen Verlaengerungen Jahresgebühren Benutzungsnachweise Fristkalender. Output: Fristenkalender und Portfolio-Audit mit Luecken Verfall und Benutzungsfragen. Abgrenzung zu schutzschrift-eilverfuegung (Verletzungsverteidigung) und markenanmeldung-dpma.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Statusuebersicht aller laufenden Prozessmandate: Fristen, Verfahrensstand, naechste Schritte. Normen: ZPO, RVG. Prüfraster: Fristenliste, offene Anträge, Termine, Mahnfristen. Output: Portfolio-Statusbericht Prozessmandate. Abgrenzung: nicht Einzelmandat-Briefing.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Workflow-Skill zu aufklaerungsfehler beweisstrategie. Nutzt Normtext, Nutzerangaben und verifizierte Quellen; Rechtsprechung nur nach Live-Pruefung mit Gericht, Datum und Aktenzeichen.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Strukturierte Prüfung von Ansprüchen wegen Behandlungsfehler nach §§ 630a ff. BGB iVm § 823 BGB. Behandlungsvertrag Aufklärungspflicht § 630e BGB Dokumentationspflicht § 630f BGB Beweislastregeln § 630h BGB grober Behandlungsfehler Beweislastumkehr voll beherrschbares Risiko Anfaengerstandard Schmerzensgeld § 253 BGB. Schlichtungsstelle Aerztekammer MDK-Gutachten. Verjährung drei Jahre § 195 BGB Hoechstfrist dreissig Jahre § 199 Abs. 2 BGB.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Workflow-Skill zu fachanwalt medizinrecht aufklaerungsfehler. Nutzt Normtext, Nutzerangaben und verifizierte Quellen; Rechtsprechung nur nach Live-Pruefung mit Gericht, Datum und Aktenzeichen.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Behandlungsfehler §§ 630a 630h BGB Verletzung medizinischer Standard. Diagnosefehler Therapiefehler Befunderhebungsfehler Hygienefehler. Beweisregeln § 630h BGB Vermutung Kausalität bei grobem Behandlungsfehler § 630h Abs. 5 BGB Befunderhebungsfehler Dokumentationsmangel. Schadensersatzanspruch §§ 280 823 BGB Schmerzensgeld § 253 BGB. Verjährung drei Jahre § 195 BGB ab Kenntnis 30 Jahre Hoechstfrist.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Mandant hatte Verkehrsunfall und fragt: Wer haftet wie viel und welche Schadensposten koennen geltend gemacht werden? §§ 7 17 18 StVG iVm § 254 BGB Haftungsquote. Prüfraster: Betriebsgefahr beidseitig Anscheinsbeweis Auffahrunfall Spurwechsel Rotlicht Vorfahrt Mithaftung Tempo Sicherheitsabstand Anschnall. Schadenspositionen Reparatur fiktive Abrechnung Mietwagen Nutzungsausfall Sachverständige Schmerzensgeld. Output: Haftungsquoten-Berechnung und Schadenstabelle. Abgrenzung zu fachanwalt-verkehrsrecht-regulierungsanforderung (Gläubigerseite vs. Versicherer) und fachanwalt-verkehrsrecht-versicherer-quotenverhandlung-vergleich.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Verkehrsunfall-Mandat im Zivilprozess vorbereiten: Schadensersatz, Schmerzensgeld, Versicherungskorrespondenz. Normen: §§ 7 18 StVG, §§ 823 253 BGB, § 115 VVG. Prüfraster: Haftungsquote, Schadensposten, Verjaebrung, Regulierungsablauf. Output: Klageschrift Verkehrsunfall oder Klageerwiderung. Abgrenzung: nicht Strafrecht oder Ordnungswidrigkeiten.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Analyzes an entire portfolio of contracts at scale — extracting key terms, obligations, renewal dates, risk provisions, and financial commitments across hundreds or thousands of agreements simultaneously. Produces structured reports, obligation trackers, renewal calendars, and risk matrices. Also supports playbook-based redlining where contracts are compared against preferred positions and automatically marked up. Use when an in-house legal team, GC, legal ops, procurement, or finance team needs portfolio-wide visibility into contract terms, upcoming renewals, obligation compliance, or batch contract review against organizational standards.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Classifies personal vs non-personal data per GDPR Art. 4(1) definition test with decision tree for borderline cases. References Breyer v Germany CJEU C-582/14 dynamic IP ruling and WP29 Opinion 4/2007. Keywords: personal data, GDPR Art 4, data classification, Breyer ruling, identifiability test, PII.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Use when a matter involves marriage, divorce, property division, custody, or inheritance for non-Muslim residents of the UAE under Federal Decree-Law 41/2022 (the UAE Civil Personal Status Law) or the DIFC Wills Service Centre. Covers no-fault divorce, joint-custody default, equal-property division, testamentary freedom for non-Muslims, pre-nuptial agreement enforceability, and the parallel DIFC/ADGM wills regimes. Contrasts with the UAE Personal Status Law 28/2005 (Sharia-based) which governs Muslim residents. Triggers on non-Muslim divorce UAE, UAE civil marriage, DIFC wills, UAE prenup, or expat family law UAE questions.

Habilidades Relacionadas