Communitygithub.com

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Generates a Lost Wage & Economic Loss Report for personal injury litigation. Calculates past/future lost wages, diminished earning capacity, medical expenses, and out-of-pocket costs with source-cited, present-value projections. Use when quantifying economic damages for plaintiff-side personal injury matters during discovery, pre-trial, or settlement. Trigger: lost wages, economic damages, earning capacity, wage loss, damages calculation, personal injury damages.

O que é legal-skills-open?

legal-skills-open is a Claude Code agent skill that generates a Lost Wage & Economic Loss Report for personal injury litigation. Calculates past/future lost wages, diminished earning capacity, medical expenses, and out-of-pocket costs with source-cited, present-value projections. Use when quantifying economic damages for plaintiff-side personal injury matters during discovery, pre-trial, or settlement. Trigger: lost wages, economic damages, earning capacity, wage loss, damages calculation, personal injury damages.

Funciona com~Claude Code~Codex CLI~Cursor
npx skills add https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open/tree/HEAD/us/personal-injury/skills/economic-loss-report

Perguntar na sua IA favorita

Abre um novo chat com esta habilidade de agente já pré-carregada.

Documentação

Lost Wage & Economic Loss Report

Calculates all economic damages in a personal injury matter, structured to withstand scrutiny from opposing counsel, insurance adjusters, experts, and the court.

Prerequisites

Gather before starting:

  • Medical records — diagnoses, treatment notes, prognosis, work restrictions, permanency opinions
  • Employment/wage records — pay stubs (12-24 months pre-injury), W-2s, tax returns, employer verification letters
  • Medical bills — itemized bills, EOBs, payment records
  • Incident documentation — date, location, nature of injury-causing event
  • Expert reports (if available) — vocational evaluations, life care plans, economist reports

Workflow

  1. Extract claimant profile and injury facts from case documents
  2. Build pre-injury earnings baseline from employment records
  3. Calculate past lost wages (injury date through present/MMI)
  4. Project future economic loss and diminished earning capacity
  5. Tabulate past and future medical expenses
  6. Quantify other economic losses (household services, transport, modifications)
  7. Compile damages summary with conservative and aggressive scenarios
  8. Generate exhibit list with source citations

Output Structure

1. Claimant Profile

ElementInclude
IdentityFull name, DOB, contact
IncidentDate, location, nature, parties
InjuriesDiagnoses, treatment timeline, current status, prognosis
Permanent impairmentsWork restrictions with physician quotes and citations
ScopeTime periods covered; past vs. future losses

Cite source document and page for every fact. Flag gaps for follow-up discovery.

2. Pre-Injury Earnings

Extract from pay stubs, W-2s, tax returns, employer letters:

ComponentMethod
Base wage/salaryRate + raise dates
Overtime12-24 month pre-injury average, month-by-month
Bonuses/commissionsPayment patterns and amounts
BenefitsHealth insurance, retirement contributions
Secondary incomeAffected side employment

Output monthly/quarterly earnings table: Period | Base | Overtime | Bonus/Commission | Total

Note seasonal variations and advancement trajectory.

3. Past Lost Wages

Calculate from injury date through present or MMI: Net Lost Wages = "But-For" Earnings − Actual Earnings Received.

"But-for" earnings include: regular wages, predictable overtime, scheduled raises/COLAs, expected bonuses.

Offsets: modified-duty wages, STD/LTD payments, workers' comp TD, alternative employment earnings.

Output table: Month/Quarter | But-For Earnings | Actual Earnings | Net Lost Wages | Running Total

Additional items: lost health insurance (replacement cost), lost retirement contributions, lost PTO/benefits, tax implications (gross vs. net per jurisdiction).

Flag estimated periods with basis for estimation.

4. Future Loss & Diminished Earning Capacity

FactorSource
Work-life expectancyAge, occupation, pre-injury health
Recovery timelineTreating physician opinions
Permanent restrictionsMedical records, vocational expert
Post-injury capacityVocational assessment, labor market data

Temporary future losses: Project from medical opinions; apply past-wage methodology with growth factors.

Permanent diminished capacity: Annual Loss = Pre-Injury Trajectory − Post-Injury Capacity. Present value = sum of (Annual Loss × Discount Factor) over work-life expectancy.

Include: wage growth rate, career advancement, lost benefits, jurisdiction-appropriate discount rate (cite source).

Show table: Year | Projected Loss | Discount Factor | Present Value

Provide sensitivity analysis varying recovery timeline, earning capacity, discount rate, work-life expectancy. Label conservative vs. aggressive scenarios.

5. Medical Expenses

Past: Table with Date | Provider | Service Type | Billed | Insurance Paid | Out-of-Pocket | Status. Categories: emergency, hospitalization, surgery, physician visits, PT/rehab, diagnostics, prescriptions, DME.

Future: Source from physician opinions or life care plan — ongoing therapy, future surgeries, long-term medications, equipment, monitoring. Present both nominal and present value totals.

6. Other Economic Losses

CategoryMethod
Household servicesHours/week × market rate per type
TransportationVisit count × mileage rate + parking
Home modificationsReceipts/estimates for ramps, bathroom, adaptive equipment
MiscellaneousOTC medications, supplies, damaged property

Distinguish past (incurred) vs. future (projected).

7. Damages Summary

CategoryAmount
Past Lost Wages (date range)$
Future Lost Wages / Diminished Capacity (PV)$
Past Medical Expenses$
Future Medical Expenses (PV)$
Household Services (past + future)$
Transportation$
Home Modifications / Other$
TOTAL ECONOMIC DAMAGES$

Include gross and after-tax totals if jurisdiction requires. Add 1-2 paragraph narrative on key damage drivers. Present conservative and aggressive scenarios with recommended figure labeled.

8. Exhibit List

Sequential by category: employment/wage docs, medical records/bills, expert reports, receipts/invoices, other.

Format: Exhibit # | Description | Date | Relevance to Calculation

Critical Rules

  • Every figure cites a source — document name, date, page
  • Show all formulas and assumptions — calculations must be replicable
  • No advocacy language — let numbers speak; maintain objectivity
  • Discount rates — jurisdiction-appropriate; state source
  • Plaintiff-side but credible — conservative methodology builds credibility

Common Pitfalls

  • Missing mitigation evidence — always document claimant's return-to-work attempts
  • Pre-existing conditions — explicitly distinguish pre-existing vs. injury-caused limitations
  • Earnings anomalies — explain any pre-injury income irregularities
  • Unsupported projections — ground all future estimates in documented medical opinions
  • Jurisdiction variance — tax treatment, discount rate standards, and gross-vs-net rules vary by state; confirm applicable rules
  • Gaps not flagged — identify where additional discovery, vocational evaluation, life care plan, or economist report would strengthen the analysis

Individual skills in this repo

This repo contains 20 individual skills — each has its own dedicated page.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Track the IP portfolio — registrations, renewals, maintenance fees, and use declarations. Use when checking what's renewing, adding or updating an asset, recording a maintenance filing, or auditing the register for gaps, lapses, and use-in-commerce questions. Receives handoffs from prosecution and clearance work.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

When the user's message starts with "Canada" (case-insensitive), generate a full Ontario PI Case Assessment Memo from the case_stressor corpus and return it verbatim. This is the primary handler for Canadian fact patterns — DO NOT ask clarifying questions first; run the memo and let the lawyer react.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

交通事故责任评估与判定专业技能。当用户需要交通事故责任分析、事故现场照片评估、交通法规咨询、事故责任划分、法律依据查询时触发此技能。适用于车辆碰撞事故、行人事故、非机动车事故等各类道路交通事故的责任认定场景。无论用户使用"交通事故"、"车祸"、"责任判定"、"交通法规"、"事故定责"等何种表述,只要涉及交通事故评估或责任认定,均应调用此技能。

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Strategische Markenportfolio-Planung für Luxus-Modehaeuser: Mandant will Marken in DE/EU/international schützen oder Portfolio optimieren. Normen: §§ 32 ff. MarkenG, Art. 32 ff. UMV (EU) 2017/1001, Madrid-Protokoll (WIPO). Prüfraster: Nizza-Klassen (3/14/18/25/35), Multi-Class-Strategie, Prioritaets-Kaskade, Kostenoptimierung, Anmeldezeitpunkt. Output Marken-Portfolio-Plan, Anmelde-Empfehlung je Territorium, Kostenprojektion. Abgrenzung: Einzelne Anmeldung DPMA siehe wortmarke-anmeldung-dpma; Madrid-Protokoll Details siehe madrid-protokoll-und-internationale-registrierung.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Audit an intellectual-property portfolio for ownership, protection, scope, deadlines, territorial coverage, use, value, encumbrances, and enforcement risk. Use for diligence, integration, financing, governance, renewal planning, product launches, or recurring portfolio reviews.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Use whenever the user asks about a motor-vehicle statute, citation, contributing factor, OR a Canadian personal-injury fact pattern — always query Specter's Harvester API before answering. The API auto-routes between two collections (US statutes + Canadian PI case law).

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Assesses product liability exposure on given facts — classifying the defect as manufacturing, design, or warning/instruction, mapping which party in the supply chain is potentially exposed, and grading the realistic exposure. Use this whenever a user wants product liability worked through rather than a general deficiency test — including phrasings like "what's our exposure if this product injured someone", "is this a design defect or a manufacturing defect", "who in the supply chain is on the hook here", "assess our product liability risk on these facts", or "how exposed are we if the warning label was inadequate". Distinct from deficiency-analyst, which tests service and trade-practice thresholds — this is specific to defective products and supply-chain exposure. Fires for any product liability question, in any jurisdiction, for manufacturers, assemblers, sellers, distributors, or importers.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

KI-VO Hochrisiko-Anforderungen für Personalwesen in Kanzleien ab August 2026: Anwendungsfall Kanzlei setzt KI im HR-Bereich ein oder beraet Mandanten zum AGG-konformen KI-Einsatz bei Bewerberauswahl. Anhang III Nr. 4 KI-VO Hochrisiko Bewerberauswahl, Inkrafttreten 2. August 2026, AGG Diskriminierungsverbot. Prüfraster Hochrisiko-Klassifizierung eigener HR-KI, Konformitätsbewertung, Transparenzpflichten für Betroffene, Beratungsmandate Arbeitsrecht. Output Checkliste Hochrisiko-Anforderungen mit Umsetzungsplan für August 2026. Abgrenzung zu Bias-und-Diskriminierung-Prüfung und zu KI-VO-Betreiber-Pflichten.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Vorlagetabelle für Portfolio-Review von Arbeitsvertraegen im 3D-Format: Forderung/Prüfung/Stellung. Normen: BGB, KSchG, ArbZG. Prüfraster: Vertragsbedingungen, Klauselgueltigkeit, HR-Compliance. Output: Arbeitsvertrag-Portfolio-Tabelle. Abgrenzung: nicht allgemeine 3D-Review-Konfiguration.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Unternehmen oder Kanzlei muss IP-Portfolio verwalten und anstehende Fristen im Blick behalten. Schutzrechtsportfolio-Verwaltung. Prüfraster: Eintragungen Verlaengerungen Jahresgebühren Benutzungsnachweise Fristkalender. Output: Fristenkalender und Portfolio-Audit mit Luecken Verfall und Benutzungsfragen. Abgrenzung zu schutzschrift-eilverfuegung (Verletzungsverteidigung) und markenanmeldung-dpma.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Statusuebersicht aller laufenden Prozessmandate: Fristen, Verfahrensstand, naechste Schritte. Normen: ZPO, RVG. Prüfraster: Fristenliste, offene Anträge, Termine, Mahnfristen. Output: Portfolio-Statusbericht Prozessmandate. Abgrenzung: nicht Einzelmandat-Briefing.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Workflow-Skill zu aufklaerungsfehler beweisstrategie. Nutzt Normtext, Nutzerangaben und verifizierte Quellen; Rechtsprechung nur nach Live-Pruefung mit Gericht, Datum und Aktenzeichen.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Strukturierte Prüfung von Ansprüchen wegen Behandlungsfehler nach §§ 630a ff. BGB iVm § 823 BGB. Behandlungsvertrag Aufklärungspflicht § 630e BGB Dokumentationspflicht § 630f BGB Beweislastregeln § 630h BGB grober Behandlungsfehler Beweislastumkehr voll beherrschbares Risiko Anfaengerstandard Schmerzensgeld § 253 BGB. Schlichtungsstelle Aerztekammer MDK-Gutachten. Verjährung drei Jahre § 195 BGB Hoechstfrist dreissig Jahre § 199 Abs. 2 BGB.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Workflow-Skill zu fachanwalt medizinrecht aufklaerungsfehler. Nutzt Normtext, Nutzerangaben und verifizierte Quellen; Rechtsprechung nur nach Live-Pruefung mit Gericht, Datum und Aktenzeichen.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Behandlungsfehler §§ 630a 630h BGB Verletzung medizinischer Standard. Diagnosefehler Therapiefehler Befunderhebungsfehler Hygienefehler. Beweisregeln § 630h BGB Vermutung Kausalität bei grobem Behandlungsfehler § 630h Abs. 5 BGB Befunderhebungsfehler Dokumentationsmangel. Schadensersatzanspruch §§ 280 823 BGB Schmerzensgeld § 253 BGB. Verjährung drei Jahre § 195 BGB ab Kenntnis 30 Jahre Hoechstfrist.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Mandant hatte Verkehrsunfall und fragt: Wer haftet wie viel und welche Schadensposten koennen geltend gemacht werden? §§ 7 17 18 StVG iVm § 254 BGB Haftungsquote. Prüfraster: Betriebsgefahr beidseitig Anscheinsbeweis Auffahrunfall Spurwechsel Rotlicht Vorfahrt Mithaftung Tempo Sicherheitsabstand Anschnall. Schadenspositionen Reparatur fiktive Abrechnung Mietwagen Nutzungsausfall Sachverständige Schmerzensgeld. Output: Haftungsquoten-Berechnung und Schadenstabelle. Abgrenzung zu fachanwalt-verkehrsrecht-regulierungsanforderung (Gläubigerseite vs. Versicherer) und fachanwalt-verkehrsrecht-versicherer-quotenverhandlung-vergleich.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Verkehrsunfall-Mandat im Zivilprozess vorbereiten: Schadensersatz, Schmerzensgeld, Versicherungskorrespondenz. Normen: §§ 7 18 StVG, §§ 823 253 BGB, § 115 VVG. Prüfraster: Haftungsquote, Schadensposten, Verjaebrung, Regulierungsablauf. Output: Klageschrift Verkehrsunfall oder Klageerwiderung. Abgrenzung: nicht Strafrecht oder Ordnungswidrigkeiten.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Analyzes an entire portfolio of contracts at scale — extracting key terms, obligations, renewal dates, risk provisions, and financial commitments across hundreds or thousands of agreements simultaneously. Produces structured reports, obligation trackers, renewal calendars, and risk matrices. Also supports playbook-based redlining where contracts are compared against preferred positions and automatically marked up. Use when an in-house legal team, GC, legal ops, procurement, or finance team needs portfolio-wide visibility into contract terms, upcoming renewals, obligation compliance, or batch contract review against organizational standards.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Classifies personal vs non-personal data per GDPR Art. 4(1) definition test with decision tree for borderline cases. References Breyer v Germany CJEU C-582/14 dynamic IP ruling and WP29 Opinion 4/2007. Keywords: personal data, GDPR Art 4, data classification, Breyer ruling, identifiability test, PII.

ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Use when a matter involves marriage, divorce, property division, custody, or inheritance for non-Muslim residents of the UAE under Federal Decree-Law 41/2022 (the UAE Civil Personal Status Law) or the DIFC Wills Service Centre. Covers no-fault divorce, joint-custody default, equal-property division, testamentary freedom for non-Muslims, pre-nuptial agreement enforceability, and the parallel DIFC/ADGM wills regimes. Contrasts with the UAE Personal Status Law 28/2005 (Sharia-based) which governs Muslim residents. Triggers on non-Muslim divorce UAE, UAE civil marriage, DIFC wills, UAE prenup, or expat family law UAE questions.

Habilidades Relacionadas