kwangsing3/claude-skills-toolkit
Personal Claude Code plugin marketplace — portable git workflow skills (conventional commits, docs/metadata sync, changelog releases).
Personal Claude Code plugin marketplace — portable git workflow skills (conventional commits, docs/metadata sync, changelog releases).
npx skills add kwangsing3/claude-skills-toolkitPersonal Claude Code plugin marketplace — portable git workflow skills (conventional commits, docs/metadata sync, changelog releases).
A Claude Code skills plugin that turns academic papers into presentation-ready XeLaTeX Beamer decks and multi-paper research-gap analyses.
Use when the user wants to know what will break if they change something, or needs safety analysis before editing code. Examples: "Is it safe to change X?", "What depends on this?", "What will break?"
Rigor Intake helper for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to scan a repository, read the README and common project files, extract documented commands, classify inference, evaluation, and training candidates, and return the smallest trustworthy reproduction plan to the main orchestrator. Do not use for environment setup, asset download, command execution, final reporting, paper lookup, or end-to-end orchestration.
🌉 Connect GraphQL APIs seamlessly with the Model Context Protocol for enhanced data management and integration.
Rigor Explore compatible skill slug for meaningful and potentially novel deep learning research candidates. Use when the researcher has chosen the task family, dataset, benchmark, evaluation method, provided SOTA references, and wants candidate-only exploration on top of `current_research` with auditable repo understanding, idea gating, fair comparison, and governed experiments written to `explore_outputs/`. Do not use for README-first trusted reproduction, open-ended direction finding, narrow code-only or run-only exploration, passive repo analysis, verified novelty claims, or implicit experimentation.
Draft, audit, or revise point-by-point reviewer response letters for Nature-family manuscript revisions. Use when the user provides reviewer comments, editor decision letters, revision notes, response drafts, or asks how to respond to major/minor revision requests, rebuttal letters, response to reviewers, peer-review reports, 审稿意见回复, 逐点回复, 修回信, 大修回复, 小修回复, or 如何回复 reviewer. Also trigger on general peer-review response needs during academic writing/revision even without the word "Nature", such as replying to reviewers for any journal, writing a rebuttal/response letter, handling revision comments, and Chinese phrasings like 回复审稿人、审稿回复、返修、 修改稿回复、写rebuttal、回应审稿意见、应对审稿.