저장소 및 시스템에 대한 포괄적인 STRIDE-A 위협 모델 분석 및 점진적 업데이트 스킬입니다. 단일 분석과 점진적 분석의 두 가지 모드를 지원합니다.
이 스킬은 개발자와 보안 엔지니어가 저장소의 보안 위협을 체계적으로 식별, 분석 및 추적할 수 있도록 돕는 도구입니다. GitHub 저장소를 대상으로 STRIDE-A(스푸핑, 변조, 부인, 정보 유출, 서비스 거부, 권한 상승) 위협 모델링을 완전 자동화하여, 아키텍처 개요, DFD 다이어그램, 위협 목록 및 우선순위가 매겨진 결과물을 생성합니다. 두 가지 주요 모드로 작동합니다. 첫 번째는 단일 분석 모드로, 현재 코드베이스에 대한 완전한 위협 모델 보고서를 생성합니다. 두 번째는 점진적 분석 모드로, 이전 위협 모델 보고서를 기준으로 삼아 최신 커밋(또는 특정 커밋)과 비교하여 변경 사항을 추적하고, 새로운 위협, 해결된 위협, 여전히 존재하는 위협을 식별합니다. 이 스킬은 Claude Code, Cursor, Codex 등 AI 에이전트 환경에서 사용할 수 있으며, 사용자가 명시적으로 위협 모델 분석 또는 점진적 업데이트를 요청하거나 /threat-model-analyst 명령어를 호출할 때만 활성화됩니다.
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/tree/main/skills/threat-model-analystInstalled? Explore more 연구 & 데이터 분석 skills: affaan-m/uspto-database, affaan-m/scholar-evaluation, affaan-m/literature-review · View all 6 →
저장소 및 시스템에 대한 포괄적인 STRIDE-A 위협 모델 분석 및 점진적 업데이트 스킬입니다. 다음 두 가지 모드를 지원합니다: (1) 단일 분석 — 저장소 전체에 대한 STRIDE-A 위협 모델로, 아키텍처 개요, DFD 다이어그램, STRIDE-A 분석, 우선순위가 매겨진 결과물 및 경영진 평가를 생성합니다. (2) 점진적 분석 — 이전 위협 모델 보고서를 기준으로 삼아, 최신(또는 특정 커밋) 코드베이스를 비교하여 변경 추적(새로운 위협, 해결된 위협, 여전히 존재하는 위협)이 포함된 업데이트된 보고서, STRIDE 히트맵, 결과물 차이(diff), 임베디드 HTML 비교 페이지를 생성합니다. 사용자가 명시적으로 위협 모델 분석, 점진적 업데이트를 요청하거나 직접 /threat-model-analyst를 호출할 때만 활성화됩니다.
This repo contains 20 individual skills — each has its own dedicated page.
Use this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.
Add educational comments to the file specified, or prompt asking for file to comment if one is not provided.
Patterns and techniques for adding governance, safety, and trust controls to AI agent systems. Use this skill when: - Building AI agents that call external tools (APIs, databases, file systems) - Implementing policy-based access controls for agent tool usage - Adding semantic intent classification to detect dangerous prompts - Creating trust scoring systems for multi-agent workflows - Building audit trails for agent actions and decisions - Enforcing rate limits, content filters, or tool restrictions on agents - Working with any agent framework (PydanticAI, CrewAI, OpenAI Agents, LangChain, AutoGen)
Patterns and techniques for evaluating and improving AI agent outputs. Use this skill when: - Implementing self-critique and reflection loops - Building evaluator-optimizer pipelines for quality-critical generation - Creating test-driven code refinement workflows - Designing rubric-based or LLM-as-judge evaluation systems - Adding iterative improvement to agent outputs (code, reports, analysis) - Measuring and improving agent response quality
Check any AI agent codebase against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 risks. Use this skill when: - Evaluating an agent system's security posture before production deployment - Running a compliance check against OWASP ASI 2026 standards - Mapping existing security controls to the 10 agentic risks - Generating a compliance report for security review or audit - Comparing agent framework security features against the standard - Any request like "is my agent OWASP compliant?", "check ASI compliance", or "agentic security audit"
Comprehensive AI prompt engineering safety review and improvement prompt. Analyzes prompts for safety, bias, security vulnerabilities, and effectiveness while providing detailed improvement recommendations with extensive frameworks, testing methodologies, and educational content.
Instrument a webapp to send useful telemetry data to Azure App Insights
Serves as a reviewer of the codebase with instructions on looking for Apple App Store optimizations or rejection reasons.
Comprehensive project architecture blueprint generator that analyzes codebases to create detailed architectural documentation. Automatically detects technology stacks and architectural patterns, generates visual diagrams, documents implementation patterns, and provides extensible blueprints for maintaining architectural consistency and guiding new development.
Triage and resolve Arch Linux issues with pacman, systemd, and rolling-release best practices.
Creates, reads, updates, and deletes Arize AI integrations that store LLM provider credentials used by evaluators and other Arize features. Supports any LLM provider (e.g. OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure OpenAI, AWS Bedrock, Vertex AI, Gemini, NVIDIA NIM). Use when the user mentions AI integration, LLM provider credentials, create integration, list integrations, update credentials, delete integration, or connecting an LLM provider to Arize.
Creates and manages annotation configs (categorical, continuous, freeform label schemas) and annotation queues (human review workflows) on Arize. Applies human annotations to project spans via the Python SDK. Use when the user mentions annotation config, annotation queue, label schema, human feedback, bulk annotate spans, update_annotations, labeling queue, annotate record, or human review.
Creates, manages, and queries Arize datasets and examples. Covers dataset CRUD, appending examples, exporting data, and file-based dataset creation using the ax CLI. Use when the user needs test data, evaluation examples, or mentions create dataset, list datasets, export dataset, append examples, dataset version, golden dataset, or test set.
Handles LLM-as-judge evaluation workflows on Arize including creating/updating evaluators, running evaluations on spans or experiments, managing tasks, trigger-run operations, column mapping, and continuous monitoring. Use when the user mentions create evaluator, LLM judge, hallucination, faithfulness, correctness, relevance, run eval, score spans, score experiment, trigger-run, column mapping, continuous monitoring, or improve evaluator prompt.
Creates, runs, and analyzes Arize experiments for evaluating and comparing model performance. Covers experiment CRUD, exporting runs, comparing results, and evaluation workflows using the ax CLI. Use when the user mentions create experiment, run experiment, compare models, model performance, evaluate AI, experiment results, benchmark, A/B test models, or measure accuracy.
Adds Arize AX tracing to an LLM application for the first time. Follows a two-phase agent-assisted flow to analyze the codebase then implement instrumentation after user confirmation. Use when the user wants to instrument their app, add tracing from scratch, set up LLM observability, integrate OpenTelemetry or openinference, or get started with Arize tracing.
Generates deep links to the Arize UI for traces, spans, sessions, datasets, labeling queues, evaluators, and annotation configs. Produces clickable URLs for sharing Arize resources with team members. Use when the user wants to link to or open a trace, span, session, dataset, evaluator, or annotation config in the Arize UI.
Optimizes, improves, and debugs LLM prompts using production trace data, evaluations, and annotations. Extracts prompts from spans, gathers performance signal, and runs a data-driven optimization loop using the ax CLI. Use when the user mentions optimize prompt, improve prompt, make AI respond better, improve output quality, prompt engineering, prompt tuning, or system prompt improvement.
Downloads, exports, and inspects existing Arize traces and spans to understand what an LLM app is doing or debug runtime issues. Covers exporting traces by ID, spans by ID, sessions by ID, and root-cause investigation using the ax CLI. Use when the user wants to look at existing trace data, see what their LLM app is doing, export traces, download spans, investigate errors, or analyze behavior regressions.
Aspire skill covering the Aspire CLI, AppHost orchestration, service discovery, integrations, MCP server, VS Code extension, Dev Containers, GitHub Codespaces, templates, dashboard, and deployment. Use when the user asks to create, run, debug, configure, deploy, or troubleshoot an Aspire distributed application.
USPTO patent and trademark data workflow for official record lookup, PatentSearch queries, TSDR checks, assignment data, and reproducible IP research logs.
Structured scholarly-work evaluation for papers, proposals, literature reviews, methods sections, evidence quality, citation support, and research-writing feedback.
Systematic literature-review workflow for academic, biomedical, technical, and scientific topics, including search planning, source screening, synthesis, citation checks, and evidence logging.
The agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond.
Agent skill repository discovered by 10x-chat research.
Review backend code for quality, security, maintainability, and best practices based on established checklist rules. Use when the user requests a review, analysis, or improvement of backend files (e.g., `.py`) under the `api/` directory. Do NOT use for frontend files (e.g., `.tsx`, `.ts`, `.js`). Supports pending-change review, code snippets review, and file-focused review.