Communityコーディング&開発github.com

alfathafp/portofolio-web-design

Prepares production launches. Use when preparing to deploy to production, or when asking what needs to be in place before shipping. Use when you need a pre-launch checklist, when setting up monitoring, when planning a staged rollout, or when you need a rollback strategy.

portofolio-web-design とは?

portofolio-web-design is a Claude Code agent skill that prepares production launches. Use when preparing to deploy to production, or when asking what needs to be in place before shipping. Use when you need a pre-launch checklist, when setting up monitoring, when planning a staged rollout, or when you need a rollback strategy.

対応~Claude Code~Codex CLI~Cursor
npx skills add https://github.com/alfathafp/portofolio-web-design/tree/HEAD/.agents/skills/shipping-and-launch

Installed? Explore more コーディング&開発 skills: steipete/bluebubbles, steipete/eightctl, steipete/blucli · View all 6 →

お気に入りのAIに質問する

このエージェントスキルを事前に読み込んだ状態で新しいチャットを開きます。

ドキュメント

Shipping and Launch

Overview

Ship with confidence. The goal is not just to deploy — it's to deploy safely, with monitoring in place, a rollback plan ready, and a clear understanding of what success looks like. Every launch should be reversible, observable, and incremental.

When to Use

  • Deploying a feature to production for the first time
  • Releasing a significant change to users
  • Migrating data or infrastructure
  • Opening a beta or early access program
  • Any deployment that carries risk (all of them)

The Pre-Launch Checklist

Code Quality

  • All tests pass (unit, integration, e2e)
  • Build succeeds with no warnings
  • Lint and type checking pass
  • Code reviewed and approved
  • No TODO comments that should be resolved before launch
  • No console.log debugging statements in production code
  • Error handling covers expected failure modes

Security

  • No secrets in code or version control
  • The ecosystem's dependency audit (npm audit, pip-audit, cargo audit, ...) shows no critical or high vulnerabilities
  • Input validation on all user-facing endpoints
  • Authentication and authorization checks in place
  • Security headers configured (CSP, HSTS, etc.)
  • Rate limiting on authentication endpoints
  • CORS configured to specific origins (not wildcard)

Performance

  • Core Web Vitals within "Good" thresholds
  • No N+1 queries in critical paths
  • Images optimized (compression, responsive sizes, lazy loading)
  • Bundle size within budget
  • Database queries have appropriate indexes
  • Caching configured for static assets and repeated queries

Accessibility

  • Keyboard navigation works for all interactive elements
  • Screen reader can convey page content and structure
  • Color contrast meets WCAG 2.1 AA (4.5:1 for text)
  • Focus management correct for modals and dynamic content
  • Error messages are descriptive and associated with form fields
  • No accessibility warnings in axe-core or Lighthouse

Infrastructure

  • Environment variables set in production
  • Database migrations applied (or ready to apply)
  • DNS and SSL configured
  • CDN configured for static assets
  • Logging and error reporting configured
  • Health check endpoint exists and responds

Documentation

  • README updated with any new setup requirements
  • API documentation current
  • ADRs written for any architectural decisions
  • Changelog updated
  • User-facing documentation updated (if applicable)

Feature Flag Strategy

Ship behind feature flags to decouple deployment from release:

// Feature flag check
const flags = await getFeatureFlags(userId);

if (flags.taskSharing) {
  // New feature: task sharing
  return <TaskSharingPanel task={task} />;
}

// Default: existing behavior
return null;

Feature flag lifecycle:

1. DEPLOY with flag OFF     → Code is in production but inactive
2. ENABLE for team/beta     → Internal testing in production environment
3. GRADUAL ROLLOUT          → 5% → 25% → 50% → 100% of users
4. MONITOR at each stage    → Watch error rates, performance, user feedback
5. CLEAN UP                 → Remove flag and dead code path after full rollout

Rules:

  • Every feature flag has an owner and an expiration date
  • Clean up flags within 2 weeks of full rollout
  • Don't nest feature flags (creates exponential combinations)
  • Test both flag states (on and off) in CI

Staged Rollout

The Rollout Sequence

1. DEPLOY to staging
   └── Full test suite in staging environment
   └── Manual smoke test of critical flows

2. DEPLOY to production (feature flag OFF)
   └── Verify deployment succeeded (health check)
   └── Check error monitoring (no new errors)

3. ENABLE for team (flag ON for internal users)
   └── Team uses the feature in production
   └── 24-hour monitoring window

4. CANARY rollout (flag ON for 5% of users)
   └── Monitor error rates, latency, user behavior
   └── Compare metrics: canary vs. baseline
   └── 24-48 hour monitoring window
   └── Advance only if all thresholds pass (see table below)

5. GRADUAL increase (25% -> 50% -> 100%)
   └── Same monitoring at each step
   └── Ability to roll back to previous percentage at any point

6. FULL rollout (flag ON for all users)
   └── Monitor for 1 week
   └── Clean up feature flag

Rollout Decision Thresholds

Use these thresholds to decide whether to advance, hold, or roll back at each stage:

MetricAdvance (green)Hold and investigate (yellow)Roll back (red)
Error rateWithin 10% of baseline10-100% above baseline>2x baseline
P95 latencyWithin 20% of baseline20-50% above baseline>50% above baseline
Client JS errorsNo new error typesNew errors at <0.1% of sessionsNew errors at >0.1% of sessions
Business metricsNeutral or positiveDecline <5% (may be noise)Decline >5%

When to Roll Back

Roll back immediately if:

  • Error rate increases by more than 2x baseline
  • P95 latency increases by more than 50%
  • User-reported issues spike
  • Data integrity issues detected
  • Security vulnerability discovered

Monitoring and Observability

What to Monitor

Application metrics:
├── Error rate (total and by endpoint)
├── Response time (p50, p95, p99)
├── Request volume
├── Active users
└── Key business metrics (conversion, engagement)

Infrastructure metrics:
├── CPU and memory utilization
├── Database connection pool usage
├── Disk space
├── Network latency
└── Queue depth (if applicable)

Client metrics:
├── Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS)
├── JavaScript errors
├── API error rates from client perspective
└── Page load time

Error Reporting

// Set up error boundary with reporting
class ErrorBoundary extends React.Component {
  state = { hasError: false };

  static getDerivedStateFromError() {
    return { hasError: true };
  }

  componentDidCatch(error: Error, info: React.ErrorInfo) {
    // Report to error tracking service
    reportError(error, {
      componentStack: info.componentStack,
      userId: getCurrentUser()?.id,
      page: window.location.pathname,
    });
  }

  render() {
    if (this.state.hasError) {
      return <ErrorFallback onRetry={() => this.setState({ hasError: false })} />;
    }
    return this.props.children;
  }
}

// Server-side error reporting
app.use((err: Error, req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) => {
  reportError(err, {
    method: req.method,
    url: req.url,
    userId: req.user?.id,
  });

  // Don't expose internals to users
  res.status(500).json({
    error: { code: 'INTERNAL_ERROR', message: 'Something went wrong' },
  });
});

Post-Launch Verification

In the first hour after launch:

1. Check health endpoint returns 200
2. Check error monitoring dashboard (no new error types)
3. Check latency dashboard (no regression)
4. Test the critical user flow manually
5. Verify logs are flowing and readable
6. Confirm rollback mechanism works (dry run if possible)

Error Budget Release Gate

Your service's error budget — the fraction of requests or time your SLO allows to fail — determines whether it's safe to ship. Use it as an objective gate — not a negotiation:

Budget remaining > 20%  →  Ship normally; monitor closely
Budget remaining 0–20%  →  Slow rollouts only; no high-risk changes
Budget exhausted        →  Freeze feature work; focus entirely on reliability
Budget resets           →  Resume normal pace; bake in the fix that recovered it

A high burn rate during a canary (consuming budget faster than the baseline pace) is a hold signal in the rollout thresholds table above — treat it the same as an elevated error rate.

Rollback Strategy

Every deployment needs a rollback plan before it happens:

## Rollback Plan for [Feature/Release]

### Trigger Conditions
- Error rate > 2x baseline
- P95 latency > [X]ms
- User reports of [specific issue]

### Rollback Steps
1. Disable feature flag (if applicable)
   OR
1. Deploy previous version: `git revert <commit> && git push`
2. Verify rollback: health check, error monitoring
3. Communicate: notify team of rollback

### Database Considerations
- Migration [X] has a rollback: <verified command or runbook link>
- Data inserted by new feature: [preserved / cleaned up]

### Time to Rollback
- Feature flag: < 1 minute
- Redeploy previous version: < 5 minutes
- Database rollback: < 15 minutes

See Also

  • For the project-wide Definition of Done that every change must clear before this checklist, see ../../references/definition-of-done.md
  • For security pre-launch checks, see ../../references/security-checklist.md
  • For performance pre-launch checklist, see ../../references/performance-checklist.md
  • For accessibility verification before launch, see ../../references/accessibility-checklist.md
  • For the alerting rules and SLO-tied thresholds, see observability-and-instrumentation

Common Rationalizations

RationalizationReality
"It works in staging, it'll work in production"Production has different data, traffic patterns, and edge cases. Monitor after deploy.
"We don't need feature flags for this"Every feature benefits from a kill switch. Even "simple" changes can break things.
"Monitoring is overhead"Not having monitoring means you discover problems from user complaints instead of dashboards.
"We'll add monitoring later"Add it before launch. You can't debug what you can't see.
"Rolling back is admitting failure"Rolling back is responsible engineering. Shipping a broken feature is the failure.
"The error rate looks fine, let's keep shipping"Check the burn rate, not just the current error rate. Consuming budget faster than baseline is a hold signal even when individual thresholds are green.

Red Flags

  • Deploying without a rollback plan
  • No monitoring or error reporting in production
  • Big-bang releases (everything at once, no staging)
  • Feature flags with no expiration or owner
  • No one monitoring the deploy for the first hour
  • Production environment configuration done by memory, not code
  • "It's Friday afternoon, let's ship it"
  • Error budget exhausted but feature work continues unchanged

Verification

Before deploying:

  • Pre-launch checklist completed (all sections green)
  • Feature flag configured (if applicable)
  • Rollback plan documented
  • Monitoring dashboards set up
  • Team notified of deployment

After deploying:

  • Health check returns 200
  • Error rate is normal
  • Latency is normal
  • Critical user flow works
  • Logs are flowing
  • Rollback tested or verified ready

For every shipped service:

  • Error budget policy in place: know what action to take when budget drops below 20% and when it's exhausted

Individual skills in this repo

This repo contains 20 individual skills — each has its own dedicated page.

alfathafp/portofolio-web-design

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or planning anything new, in software or out of it (a talk, a business, a renovation).

alfathafp/portofolio-web-design

Tests in real browsers via Chrome DevTools MCP. Use when building or debugging anything that runs in a browser. Use when you need to inspect the DOM, capture console errors, analyze network requests, profile performance, or verify visual output with real runtime data. Requires the chrome-devtools MCP server to be configured.

alfathafp/portofolio-web-design

Automates CI/CD pipeline setup. Use when setting up or modifying build and deployment pipelines. Use when you need to automate quality gates, configure test runners in CI, or establish deployment strategies.

alfathafp/portofolio-web-design

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch. Use when asked to review a diff or a pull request, even when the diff is pasted inline.

alfathafp/portofolio-web-design

Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.

alfathafp/portofolio-web-design

Establishes a project's quality bar as a written contract and stops agents quietly lowering it. Interviews the user on which dimensions matter, supplies sane default thresholds when they have no number in mind, records everything in CONSTRAINTS.md, and watches the diff for a weakened bar — new @ts-ignore or eslint-disable suppressions, skipped or deleted tests, assertions stripped out, unimplemented stubs, thresholds edited down. Use when no quality bar is written down, when the user says "set up constraints" or "define our standards", when the user wants dimensions they care about — accessibility, web performance, coverage — set up as enforced constraints, when an agent keeps silencing checks or skipping tests to get to green, when you need a coverage or performance threshold and don't know what number to pick, or when an agent writes more code than anyone will read.

alfathafp/portofolio-web-design

Optimizes agent context setup. Use when starting a new session, when agent output quality degrades, when switching between tasks, or when you need to configure rules files and context for a project.

alfathafp/portofolio-web-design

Guides systematic root-cause debugging. Use when tests fail, builds break, something that worked yesterday broke, behavior doesn't match expectations, or you encounter any unexpected error. Use when you need to figure out what broke and why — a systematic approach to finding and fixing the root cause rather than guessing.

alfathafp/portofolio-web-design

Deploy applications and websites to Vercel. Use when the user requests deployment actions like "deploy my app", "deploy and give me the link", "push this live", or "create a preview deployment".

alfathafp/portofolio-web-design

Manages deprecation and migration. Use when removing old systems, APIs, or features. Use when migrating users from one implementation to another. Use when migrating a database schema in production, such as renaming or dropping a column without downtime (expand/contract). Use when deciding whether to maintain or sunset existing code.

alfathafp/portofolio-web-design

Use when a superpowers session went wrong and your human partner wants to know why — repeated work, ignored plans, stumbles, poor results, a skill that didn't fire, "it took too long", "why is it so expensive", "what is it doing" — or wants to build a bug report for the superpowers maintainers, for the current session or a past one identified by id or path, on any harness.

alfathafp/portofolio-web-design

Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies

alfathafp/portofolio-web-design

Records decisions and documentation. Use when you need to document an architecture decision (ADR) or the reasoning behind a design choice, when changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.

alfathafp/portofolio-web-design

Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when you want every assumption cross-examined before proceeding, when stress-testing a plan for hidden failure modes, when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high (production auth, security-sensitive logic, a high-stakes migration, irreversible operations), or any time a confident output would be cheaper to verify now than to debug later.

alfathafp/portofolio-web-design

Use when executing an implementation plan in the current session as the implementer yourself — your human partner chose inline execution, or no subagent tool is available

alfathafp/portofolio-web-design

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work

alfathafp/portofolio-web-design

Builds production-quality, accessible, responsive user-facing UIs. Use when building or modifying interfaces and pages, creating components, implementing layouts, meeting WCAG accessibility requirements, managing state, or when the output needs to look and feel production-quality rather than AI-generated.

alfathafp/portofolio-web-design

Structures git workflow practices. Use when making any code change. Use when committing, branching, resolving conflicts, splitting uncommitted work in a messy working tree into clean atomic commits, opening or reviewing a pull request (PR), pushing to a remote, or when you need to organize work across multiple parallel streams. Use when cutting a release, choosing a semantic version bump, tagging, or writing a changelog.

alfathafp/portofolio-web-design

Refines raw ideas into sharp, actionable concepts through structured divergent and convergent thinking. Use when an idea is still vague, when you need to stress-test assumptions before committing to a plan, or when you want to expand options before converging on one. Triggers on "ideate", "refine this idea", or "stress-test my plan".

alfathafp/portofolio-web-design

Guides stable API and interface design. Use when designing APIs, module boundaries, or any public interface. Use when creating REST or GraphQL endpoints, defining type contracts between modules, or establishing boundaries between frontend and backend.

関連スキル