マルチステップタスク（ソフトウェア機能、研究ワークフロー、イベント、学習計画など）の構造化計画を作成します。また、サブエージェントによるインタラクティブなレビューを通じて既存の計画を深掘りします。
このスキルは、複雑なマルチステップタスクを構造化された計画に落とし込むためのツールです。ソフトウェア機能の実装、研究ワークフロー、イベント企画、学習計画など、段階的な分解が有効なあらゆる目標に対応します。主な機能は2つあります。1つ目は、ユーザーが「これを計画して」「計画を作成して」「どのように構築すべきか」「これを分解して」などと依頼した際に、タスクを自動的にステップに分解し、整理された計画を生成します。ブレインストーミングドキュメントがすでにある場合にも、それを基にした計画作成が可能です。2つ目は、「計画を深掘りして」や「深化パス」といった指示に応じて、既存の計画に対してサブエージェントがインタラクティブにレビューを行い、各ステップの詳細をさらに掘り下げたり、リスクや依存関係を洗い出したりすることで、計画の質を高めます。このスキルは主にClaude CodeなどのAIエージェントプラットフォームで動作するように設計されており、探索的なリクエストに対しては、まず最初にce-brainstormスキルを使用することを推奨します。
npx skills add https://github.com/everyinc/compound-engineering-plugin/tree/main/skills/ce-planInstalled? Explore more 研究＆データ分析 skills: affaan-m/uspto-database, affaan-m/scholar-evaluation, affaan-m/literature-review · View all 6 →
マルチステップタスク（ソフトウェア機能、研究ワークフロー、イベント、学習計画など、分解が有効なあらゆる目標）の構造化計画を作成します。また、サブエージェントによるインタラクティブなレビューを通じて既存の計画を深掘りします。ユーザーが「これを計画して」「計画を作成して」「どのように構築すべきか」「これを分解して」と言った場合、またはブレインストーミングドキュメントが計画作成に適している場合に使用します。「計画を深掘りして」または「深化パス」というフレーズを深掘りフローに使用します。探索的なリクエストの場合は、最初にce-brainstormを優先してください。
This repo contains 20 individual skills — each has its own dedicated page.
Build applications where agents are first-class citizens. Use this skill when designing autonomous agents, creating MCP tools, implementing self-modifying systems, or building apps where features are outcomes achieved by agents operating in a loop.
Run comprehensive agent-native architecture review with scored principles
Explore requirements and approaches through collaborative dialogue, then write a right-sized requirements document. Use when the user says "let's brainstorm", "what should we build", or "help me think through X", presents a vague or ambitious feature request, or seems unsure about scope or direction -- even without explicitly asking to brainstorm.
Clean up local branches whose remote tracking branch is gone. Use when the user says "clean up branches", "delete gone branches", "prune local branches", "clean gone", or wants to remove stale local branches that no longer exist on the remote. Also handles removing associated worktrees for branches that have them.
Structured code review using tiered persona agents, confidence-gated findings, and a merge/dedup pipeline. In interactive mode it applies safe, verified fixes and commits them when the working tree is clean (it never pushes); in mode:agent it reports only and the caller applies. Use when reviewing code changes before creating a PR.
Create a git commit with a clear, value-communicating message. Use when the user says "commit", "commit this", "save my changes", "create a commit", or wants to commit staged or unstaged work. Produces well-structured commit messages that follow repo conventions when they exist, and defaults to conventional commit format otherwise.
Commit, push, and open a PR with an adaptive, value-first description that scales in depth with the change. Use when the user says "commit and PR", "ship this", "create a PR", or "open a pull request". Also handles description-only flows ("write a PR description", "rewrite the PR body", "describe this PR") without committing or pushing.
Document a recently solved problem to compound your team's knowledge or CONCEPTS.md, the project's shared domain vocabulary.
Refresh stale learning and pattern docs under docs/solutions/ by reviewing them against the current codebase, then updating, consolidating, or deleting drifted ones. Use when the user asks to "refresh my learnings", "audit docs/solutions/", "clean up stale learnings", or "consolidate overlapping docs", or when ce-compound flags an older doc as superseded. Do not trigger for general refactor, debugging, or code-review work unless the user has explicitly pointed at docs/solutions/.
Systematically find root causes and fix bugs. Use when debugging errors, investigating test failures, reproducing bugs from issue trackers (GitHub, Linear, Jira), or when stuck on a problem after failed fix attempts. Also use when the user says 'debug this', 'why is this failing', 'fix this bug', 'trace this error', or pastes stack traces, error messages, or issue references.
Capture a visual demo reel (GIF, terminal recording, screenshots) for PR descriptions. Use when shipping UI changes, CLI features, or any work with observable behavior that benefits from visual proof. Also use when asked to add a demo, record a GIF, screenshot a feature, show what changed visually, create a demo reel, capture evidence, add proof to a PR, or create a before/after comparison.
This skill should be used when writing Ruby and Rails code in DHH's distinctive 37signals style. It applies when writing Ruby code, Rails applications, creating models, controllers, or any Ruby file. Triggers on Ruby/Rails code generation, refactoring requests, code review, or when the user mentions DHH, 37signals, Basecamp, HEY, or Campfire style. Embodies REST purity, fat models, thin controllers, Current attributes, Hotwire patterns, and the "clarity over cleverness" philosophy.
Review requirements or plan documents using parallel persona agents that surface role-specific issues. Use when a requirements document or plan document exists and the user wants to improve it.
Build web interfaces with genuine design quality, not AI slop. Use for any frontend work - landing pages, web apps, dashboards, admin panels, components, interactive experiences. Activates for both greenfield builds and modifications to existing applications. Detects existing design systems and respects them. Covers composition, typography, color, motion, and copy. Verifies results via screenshots before declaring done.
This skill should be used when generating and editing images using the Gemini API (Nano Banana Pro). It applies when creating images from text prompts, editing existing images, applying style transfers, generating logos with text, creating stickers, product mockups, or any image generation/manipulation task. Supports text-to-image, image editing, multi-turn refinement, and composition from multiple reference images.
Generate and critically evaluate grounded ideas about a topic. Use when asking what to improve, requesting idea generation, exploring surprising directions, or wanting the AI to proactively suggest strong options before brainstorming one in depth. Triggers on phrases like 'what should I improve', 'give me ideas', 'ideate on X', 'surprise me', 'what would you change', or any request for AI-generated suggestions rather than refining the user's own idea.
Run metric-driven iterative optimization loops -- define a measurable goal, run parallel experiments, measure each against hard gates or LLM-as-judge scores, keep improvements, and converge on the best solution. Use when optimizing clustering quality, search relevance, build performance, prompt quality, or any measurable outcome that benefits from systematic experimentation.
[BETA] Start the dev server, open the feature in a browser, and iterate on improvements together.
Generate a time-windowed pulse report on what users experienced and how the product performed - usage, quality, errors, signals worth investigating. Use when the user says 'run a pulse', 'show me the pulse', 'how are we doing', 'weekly recap', 'launch-day check', or passes a time window like '24h' or '7d'. Configures via .compound-engineering/config.local.yaml and saves reports to docs/pulse-reports/.
Publish, view, comment on, and edit markdown via Proof (proofeditor.ai) — create a shareable doc, read a shared doc, and make comment/suggestion/block edits over its API. Use when the user says "view this in proof", "share to proof", "publish to proof", or wants a shareable markdown surface for a spec, plan, or draft, including publish handoffs from ce-brainstorm, ce-ideate, or ce-plan. Do not trigger on "proof" meaning evidence, math proofs, proof-of-concept, or "proofread this".
USPTO patent and trademark data workflow for official record lookup, PatentSearch queries, TSDR checks, assignment data, and reproducible IP research logs.
Structured scholarly-work evaluation for papers, proposals, literature reviews, methods sections, evidence quality, citation support, and research-writing feedback.
Systematic literature-review workflow for academic, biomedical, technical, and scientific topics, including search planning, source screening, synthesis, citation checks, and evidence logging.
The agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond.
Agent skill repository discovered by 10x-chat research.
Review backend code for quality, security, maintainability, and best practices based on established checklist rules. Use when the user requests a review, analysis, or improvement of backend files (e.g., `.py`) under the `api/` directory. Do NOT use for frontend files (e.g., `.tsx`, `.ts`, `.js`). Supports pending-change review, code snippets review, and file-focused review.