Rédige une spécification technique TECH.md pour une fonctionnalité majeure de Warp après avoir exploré le code source actuel et les contraintes d'implémentation. À utiliser lorsque l'utilisateur demande un cahier des charges technique, un plan d'implémentation ou un document d'architecture lié à une spécification produit.
Cette compétence permet de rédiger une spécification technique détaillée (fichier TECH.md) pour une fonctionnalité significative de l'application Warp. Elle automatise la recherche dans le code source existant pour identifier les contraintes d'implémentation, l'architecture actuelle et les dépendances pertinentes. Conçue pour les développeurs travaillant sur Warp, elle est particulièrement utile lorsqu'un produit ou une fonctionnalité nécessite un plan technique structuré avant la mise en œuvre. La compétence garantit que la spécification produite est alignée sur les standards de l'équipe et les limitations techniques identifiées dans le codebase. Elle s'applique principalement à des plateformes comme Claude Code et Cursor en mode agent, en utilisant les outils de recherche de code et de génération de markdown pour produire un document TECH.md complet et cohérent.
npx skills add https://github.com/warpdotdev/common-skills/tree/main/skills/write-tech-specInstalled? Explore more Recherche et analyse de données skills: affaan-m/uspto-database, affaan-m/scholar-evaluation, affaan-m/literature-review · View all 6 →
Rédige une spécification technique TECH.md pour une fonctionnalité majeure de Warp après avoir exploré le code source actuel et les contraintes d'implémentation. À utiliser lorsque l'utilisateur demande un cahier des charges technique, un plan d'implémentation ou un document d'architecture lié à une spécification produit.
This repo contains 16 individual skills — each has its own dedicated page.
Guides creation, revision, and review of Warp- or Oz-branded assets. Use when working on launch pages, docs, HTML/CSS components, UI mockups, prompts, social assets, copy, presentations, or any other branded deliverable that should look and sound unmistakably Warp or Oz.
Compare a pull request's implementation against spec context in spec_context.md and feed any material mismatches into review.json. Use during PR review when approved or repository spec context is available.
Run a model-diverse subagent council to investigate the same problem from multiple perspectives, compare findings, and produce a final recommendation. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a council, second opinions, multiple agents/models to evaluate one question, parallel investigation, red-team/blue-team comparison, or help deciding between competing technical approaches.
Create a pull request in the warp repository for the current branch. Use when the user mentions opening a PR, creating a pull request, submitting changes for review, or preparing code for merge.
Diagnose CI failures for a PR using the GitHub CLI, extract error logs, and generate a plan to fix them. Use when the user asks to check CI status, pull CI issues, triage test failures, or investigate PR build failures.
Fix compilation errors, linting issues, and test failures in the warp Rust codebase. Covers presubmit checks, WASM-specific errors, and running specific tests. Use when the user hits build errors, clippy or fmt failures, test failures, or needs to run or interpret presubmit before a PR.
Implement an approved feature from PRODUCT.md and TECH.md, keeping specs and code aligned in the same PR as implementation evolves. Use after the product and tech specs are approved and the next step is building the feature.
Generate a static interactive D3 walkthrough of a pull request. Use when the user wants a zoomable PR map, graph/canvas PR orientation, or alternate visualization of PR system components, data flow, code dependencies, and user actions.
Launch Oz cloud agents with computer use to reproduce UI-focused bug reports, capture visual evidence, and report reproduction findings. Use when investigating a specific interactive or visual bug from an issue, ticket, support report, or prompt.
Resolve Git merge conflicts by extracting only unresolved paths, conflict hunks, and compact diffs instead of loading whole files into context. Use when a merge, rebase, cherry-pick, or stash pop stops on conflicts, when `git status` shows unmerged paths, or when files contain conflict markers.
Walk users through PR review comments, fetching and displaying them first when needed, collect per-comment response decisions, apply requested fixes, and preview GitHub replies and resolutions before posting. Use when responding to PR review comments on the current branch.
Review a pull request diff and write structured feedback to review.json for the workflow to publish. Use when reviewing a checked-out PR from local artifacts like pr_diff.txt and pr_description.txt and producing machine-readable review output instead of posting directly to GitHub.
Drive a spec-first workflow for substantial features by writing PRODUCT.md before implementation, writing TECH.md when warranted, and keeping both specs updated as implementation evolves. Use when starting a significant feature, planning agent-driven implementation, or when the user wants product and tech specs checked into source control.
Create or update skills by generating, editing, or refining SKILL.md files in this repository. Use when authoring new skills or revising the structure, frontmatter, or guidance for existing ones.
Validate that a branch or pull request implementation matches introduced product, technical, security, and related specs. Use when reviewing or finishing a spec-driven change and resolving mismatches between checked-in specs and implementation.
Write a PRODUCT.md spec for a significant user-facing feature in Warp, focused on detailed behavior and validation. Use when the user asks for a product spec, desired behavior doc, or PRD, wants to define feature behavior before implementation, or when the feature is substantial or behaviorally ambiguous enough that a written spec would improve implementation or review.
USPTO patent and trademark data workflow for official record lookup, PatentSearch queries, TSDR checks, assignment data, and reproducible IP research logs.
Structured scholarly-work evaluation for papers, proposals, literature reviews, methods sections, evidence quality, citation support, and research-writing feedback.
Systematic literature-review workflow for academic, biomedical, technical, and scientific topics, including search planning, source screening, synthesis, citation checks, and evidence logging.
The agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond.
Agent skill repository discovered by 10x-chat research.
Review backend code for quality, security, maintainability, and best practices based on established checklist rules. Use when the user requests a review, analysis, or improvement of backend files (e.g., `.py`) under the `api/` directory. Do NOT use for frontend files (e.g., `.tsx`, `.ts`, `.js`). Supports pending-change review, code snippets review, and file-focused review.