CommunityCoding & Developmentgithub.com

Clara-Ren/legal-paper-review

A Claude Skill for peer review of Chinese legal papers, simulating anonymous peer review at top-tier law journals. It features paradigm-first evaluation, adversarial anti-sycophancy discipline, four distinct reviewer roles, a ten-dimension critique framework, and structured output ranking issues as fatal/major/minor.

What is legal-paper-review?

The Clara-Ren/legal-paper-review skill is designed to assist AI agents (such as Claude) in performing structured, high-quality peer review of Chinese legal academic papers. It simulates the anonymous review process of top Chinese law journals like *法学研究* and *中外法学*. The skill employs a unique "paradigm-first" evaluation approach, where the reviewer first identifies the underlying legal paradigm or methodology of the paper before critiquing. It includes an adversarial anti-sycophancy discipline to prevent the AI from simply agreeing with the author and instead challenges the paper's assumptions rigorously. The review process involves four distinct reviewer personas (e.g., a methodological purist, a doctrinal scholar), each contributing a 10-dimensional critique covering aspects such as originality, logic, evidence, and policy relevance. Finally, the skill outputs a structured review with issues classified as fatal (fundamental flaws), major (significant concerns), or minor (superficial issues), enabling clear prioritization of revisions. This tool is invaluable for legal scholars, journal editors, and students seeking rigorous, systematic, and unbiased automated reviews.

Works with✓Claude Code~Codex CLI~Cursor
npx skills add Clara-Ren/legal-paper-review

Installed? Explore more Coding & Development skills: steipete/bluebubbles, steipete/eightctl, steipete/blucli · View all 6 →

Ask in your favorite AI

Open a new chat with this agent skill pre-loaded.

Documentation

What does legal-paper-review do?

A Claude Skill for peer review of Chinese legal papers, simulating anonymous review at top journals (e.g. 《法学研究》《中外法学》). Features: paradigm-first evaluation, adversarial anti-sycophancy discipline, four reviewer roles and a ten-dimension critique, and structured output ranking issues as fatal/major/minor.

Related Skills