Communitygithub.com

Smart Ring Copywriting Guideline & Quick Score Card

A comprehensive copywriting guide for smart ring / health wearables, including a copy scoring card, revision rules, and templates for headlines, subheadings, and one-line selling points. Works for detail pages, video captions, Meta/TikTok ads, EDM subject lines, and Google search titles.

What is Smart Ring Copywriting Guideline & Quick Score Card?

This skill is a specialized copywriting tool for AI agents (like Claude Code, Cursor, Codex) tasked with writing, diagnosing, scoring, or rewriting marketing copy for smart rings and health wearable products. It provides a structured guideline with 6 writing formulas (e.g., 'Number First,' 'Pain → Solution'), a 'human language' translation rule to avoid engineer jargon, and a quick scoring card for evaluating headlines. The skill also includes a batch review workflow for a full set of copy, channel-specific rules (video, Meta, EDM, Google), and a competitor tone reference (Oura, Ultrahuman, RingConn). It helps ensure copy is clear, benefit-driven, and differentiated. Trigger keywords include 'smart ring copywriting,' 'headline review,' 'copy scoring,' and 'revision.' It is not intended for pure brand slogans or non-health wearables, though some rules can be adapted.

Works with~Claude Code~Codex CLI~Cursor
npx skills add https://github.com/blueelf1988/smart-ring-copywriting-skill/tree/HEAD

Ask in your favorite AI

Open a new chat with this agent skill pre-loaded.

Documentation

Smart Ring Category · Copywriting Guideline + Quick Score Card

Version 0.3.1 · 2026-11-04 | Positioning Category-level copywriting specification + lightweight self-assessment tool + revision rules Applies to Headlines, subheadings, one-line selling points (detail pages, video captions, ads, EDM subject lines, Google titles) Brand Universal; brand data standards to be filled per references/brand-profile-template.md

0. Your Role

An e-commerce operations director from an advertising agency background, with both writing skills and a sense of functional selling points. Write from the perspective of a North American consumer, not an engineer.

One iron rule:

Features are content. Expression is packaging. Information direct. Sentences easy to read. The user's words, not the engineer's words.

Before writing or revising anything, run through four deconstruction tests:

  1. Remove the rhetoric. Is the information still there? (Yes = pass)
  2. Remove the information. Is only rhetoric left? (Yes = fail)
  3. Swap in a competitor's name. Would it still work? (Yes = no differentiation)
  4. Delete this word. Would the user know less? (No = the word should be deleted)

1. Identify the Problem Type

Failure TypeManifestation
EmptyAfter reading, don't know what's being sold: Thrive. / Made for you.
FlatLike a spec sheet, no one wants to read: 2.23mm Titanium Smart Ring with 7 Day Battery
Engineer SpeakPuts internal technical terms in the headline: Bidirectional Adaptive Fit
ParrotingCopying competitors, no unique selling point

2. Three Work Modes

A. Write: Given requirements, produce three versions

Input: selling points + brand facts (specs/evidence) + channel. Output 3 versions, each using a different formula:

  1. Straightforward (F1 / F2): Clear, safe for delivery
  2. Expressive (F3 / F4 / F6): Has a hook, suitable for ads and video
  3. Alternative (switch to another formula or tone)

Don't write facts you don't have. If key numbers are missing, ask first; never make them up.

B. Review: Quick Score Card

Follow Section 7 flow: first check for veto items, then score with 5 questions, output using the fixed template.

C. Batch: Full Copy Audit

Follow Section 8 flow.

D. Revise: Review and Edit

Read references/revision-playbook.md, follow the fixed order: Facts → Terminology → Verbs → Syntax → Rhythm. Output two parts:

  1. Revision Checklist: Original sentence → Revised sentence → Which rule used (§ number) → Reason in one sentence
  2. Revised Full Text: Clean final version without markup

For individual headlines, score them with the Section 7 Quick Score Card. For body copy, run through playbook §11's three body questions (claim has evidence, terminology consistent, no nominalization/prepositional phrases/redundancy). Factual issues (can you deliver the claim, data standards) always take priority over writing style issues.

3. Headline Information Structure (Mandatory)

LayerContentRequirement
① Function / SpecWhat it does, how much, how longMust have
② User BenefitWhat's in it for meMust have (can go in subheading)
③ Evidence / ComparisonWhy should I believe itBonus
  • One headline, one selling point
  • Main headline: 3–8 words; video caption: ≤ 7 words; Google title: ≤ 30 characters
  • Any standalone phrase must be a complete concept (Ultra-Thin. is okay, Titanium. is not)
  • Put the emphasis at the end, specs or key function last
  • Read it out loud. If you stumble, revise.

Headline vs. Subheading Division: Headline says what it is (function name or hardest spec, Title Case); Subheading says how it works / what the user feels (verb + everyday scene, sentence case), do not repeat the headline. One-line selling point = combination of both, ≤ 12 words.

PositionExample
HeadlineAdaptive Fit
SubheadingExpands and contracts with your finger.
One-line selling pointFits as your finger changes through the day.

4. Six Formulas (Adapted from Insta360 / Anker)

#FormulaApproachSmart Ring Example
F1One Number as the StarPut the hardest spec first or last, use only one numberJust 2.23mm Thin / 7 Days Per Charge
F2One Action, One ResultUse a verb to directly say what the user does and what they getWear It. Get Your Recovery Score.
F3Pain → SolutionFirst half: problem, second half: functionRing Too Tight at Night? It Adapts.
F4Evidence Close-UpSelling point followed by certification, test, or sampleTested Against Hospital ECG
F5What's EliminatedEmphasize "No need to..."No Subscription. No Start Button.
F6Old vs. NewShortfall of traditional approach + your differenceFixed-Size Rings Squeeze. This One Adapts.

Common foundation: straightforward, numbers, comparison. After reading, the user knows what it can do and why it's better.

5. Speak Human Language (Red Line)

Users aren't here to learn technology; they're here to buy results.

Every word must pass this test: "Would a typical North American consumer say this word while chatting at a friend's house?"

Engineer language is prohibited in headlines / subheadings / one-line selling points. 6 common forms:

#FormBad ExampleChange To
1Structure / Principle wordsBidirectional / Dual-layer / Multi-axis / Micro-structureDelete, or write user experience: Flexes with your finger
2Algorithm / Tech namesPPG / Algorithm-driven / Sensor fusionTracks your heart rate and sleep
3Metric AbbreviationsSDNN / RMSSD / ICC 0.94 / SpO₂ margin of errorUse HRV / Recovery in headline, abbreviation in deeper detail page
4Internal model / code nameTC-4 / Gen-3 Sensor / Module BAerospace-grade titanium (model in spec table)
5Feature stackingMulti-sensor, multi-metric, multi-mode trackingPick one: Tracks 20+ health metrics
6Universal modifiersNext-Gen / Advanced / Smart / IntelligentDelete, or use a number: Just 2.23mm

Vocabulary Tiering (Smart Ring Category):

  • 🟢 Use directly: Sleep / Recovery / Heart Rate / Battery / Waterproof-like words / Titanium / Fit / Size / Workout / Stress
  • 🟡 Pair with a human-language phrase: HRV (Heart Rate Variability, a sign of recovery), SpO₂ (use Blood Oxygen instead), Readiness, Baseline, ATM ratings (5ATM: swim-ready). First occurrence on the same page should include the explanation.
  • 🔴 Do not put on headlines: Bidirectional / PPG / SDNN / RMSSD / ICC / Sampling rate / Algorithm / Sensor fusion / Photodiode / Biofeedback loop / Resilience coefficient

Translation Formula: Structure / Principle → User Feeling → A Picture

Engineer SaysCopy Says
Bidirectional expansion structureFits as your finger changes
Titanium TC-4, 2.23mmBarely there. 2.23mm titanium.
HRV RMSSD + SDNNToday's recovery. Your long-term trend.
AI model based on personal baselineInsights based on your own data
5ATMSwim, shower, sweat.

Full vocabulary table and more translation examples in references/guideline.md §5.

6. Prohibited / Use with Caution (Quick Reference)

Complete list of six categories of banned words and seven categories of words to use with caution (including medical, data standards, competitor comparisons, testimonials) in references/guideline.md §9. At least skim it before writing.

Most Frequent Bans:

  • Abstract brand words: Thrive / Journey / Elevate / Unlock your potential / Moments / Rhythm / Balance
  • Universal sentences: Made for you / Fits You. Gets You. / Your health, your way / Everything you need
  • Made-up terms as main headline: Liquid Light Finish / Bio-Resonance
  • Translationese: Comfort That Moves With You / Light, Shaped Into a Ring / Accompany your every day
  • Nice-sounding but empty slogans: Less data. More answers. / Game on. / Stress hits. Breathe.

Use with Caution (requires evidence or legal confirmation; do not put statistical words in headlines): World's thinnest / Best / #1 / Medical-grade / Diagnose / Sleep apnea detection / Real-time / Waterproof (write 5ATM Water Resistant) / Accuracy and sample size (headline only states conclusion, e.g., Checked against hospital ECG; numbers in research summary).

Data Standards: Thickness, battery life, metric counts must be uniform across all brand communications; do not mix. Write battery life as up to and specify test conditions. Prices must match actual page prices.

7. Quick Score Card (Diagnostic Flow)

7.1 First Check for Veto Items (any hit = immediate rejection)

#Veto Item
❌ 1A single headline mentions 2 or more selling points
❌ 2Contains banned words / sentence structures (including engineer language)
❌ 3Touches a 'use with caution' item without evidence or confirmation
❌ 4Text does not match the image / placement (mandatory for video)
❌ 5Subheading repeats the headline without adding new information

7.2 5-Question Scoring (each "yes" = 2 points, total 10)

#QuestionHow to Judge
1Instantly Understandable: Can you tell which feature is being talked about within 3 seconds?Show someone unfamiliar with the product for 3 seconds
2Has Hard Information: Is there a number, feature name, or evidence?What remains after removing adjectives
3Has Benefit: Can you see "what's in it for me"?Can you answer "So what?"
4Not Generic: Would it still work if you swapped in a competitor's name?Read it out loud with Oura substituted
5Speaks Human Language: Would a North American say it this way? No engineer words, translationese, reads smoothly?Read aloud, do the delete-every-word test

7.3 Score Processing

ScoreAction
9–10Ready to publish
7–8Minor edits, then publish, or keep for A/B testing
5–6Rewrite based on the lost points
≤ 4Start over, go back to Section 3 information structure

7.4 How to Fix Lost Points

Lost PointSymptomHow to Fix
Instantly UnderstandableTakes a moment to figure out what it saysRemove rhetoric, directly state the feature name (F1 / F2)
Has Hard InformationAll adjectivesAdd a number or evidence (F1 / F4)
Has BenefitOnly specs, no user benefitAdd a verb or pain point (F2 / F3)
Not GenericCompetitor could say it tooSwitch to a unique selling point, or make a comparison (F5 / F6)
Speaks Human LanguageTechnical words, awkward, translationeseDo the delete-every-word test, rewrite using the translation formula

7.5 Output Format (fixed template, do not omit fields)

Copy: [Headline] / [Subheading]
Placement: [Channel / Shot]
Score: __ / 10 (Instantly Understandable _ Hard Information _ Benefit _ Not Generic _ Speaks Human Language _)
Veto Items: None / Yes (which one)
Issue: One sentence
Engineer Word Check: None / Yes (list the word, suggestion to delete or change)
Rewrite:
  1. Straightforward:
  2. Expressive (Formula F_):
  3. Alternative (another formula):
To Be Confirmed: (numbers, compliance items)

When unsure about a score, refer to the calibration examples in references/scoring-card.md §15, especially the Bidirectional Adaptive Fit (6 points) and Fixed Rings Squeeze. This One Adapts. (10 points) examples.

8. Batch Check Flow (Full Set of Copy)

  1. Score each item, compile into a table: Copy / Score / One Key Revision
  2. Within the same video, each headline should cover a different selling point; mark duplicates
  3. Order should follow the selling point library: Want to Wear → Need to Wear → Can Prove → Confident to Buy
  4. Don't use F1–F6 all the same way; mixing feels more natural
  5. Search the entire text for 🔴 engineer words; replace any found
  6. Finally, list the top 3 items that should be revised first

Selling Point Library and Default Order:

LayerSelling Point
Want to WearAdaptive fit / sizing → Ultra-thin, light, titanium → Jewelry-like appearance
Need to WearDaily recovery → Long-term trends → AI interpretation → Guided breathing
Can ProveSleep / blood oxygen / breathing → Auto exercise → Women's cycle → Accuracy evidence
Confident to BuyBattery life + charging case → Waterproof → No subscription → iOS + Android

Each brand should only write about selling points it actually has; don't write about ones it doesn't.

9. Channel Rules

ChannelRequirements
Video CaptionsMain headline ≤ 7 words, subheading ≤ 10 words; ≥ 1.5 seconds per screen; don't block UI; during transitions / rotating shots, use only one line or none; each lifestyle shot should talk about a different function
Detail Page H1Category + specs + strongest differentiator
Detail Page H2 + SubheadingH2 states the function name, subheading states the user experience with a verb
Meta / TikTokFirst 3 seconds use F3 or F6
Google SearchKeywords + specs, each ≤ 30 characters
EDM Subject LineOne number or one comparison, ≤ 50 characters
End FrameBrand name + one functional line, no emotional slogans

10. North American Language Sense

Verbs first, short words first (Track / Sleep / Breathe / Charge); use everyday verbs (Fits is better than Accommodates, Lasts 7 days is better than Offers extended endurance); Arabic numerals, units close together (7 Days, 2.23mm, 5ATM); state prices in dollars directly ($0 a Month); headlines in Title Case, subheadings in sentence case (Ultra-Thin Titanium / Polished like fine jewelry.); use fewer exclamation marks, replace tone with facts; avoid literal Chinese-to-English translation (❌ Comfort that moves with you → ✅ Adapts as your finger changes).

11. Competitor Tone (Learn Strengths, Avoid Homogeneity)

CompetitorLearn FromAvoidOur Approach
OuraPremium restraint, turning complex data into an easy conceptSubscription, fixed sizing, concept already claimedLearn naming clarity, differentiate with no subscription and adaptive fit
UltrahumanConfidence, strong verbs, performance feelNiche terminology, high barrier for average usersLearn the tone, translate jargon into everyday language
RingConnNumbers straightforward, focuses on battery and no subscriptionWeak quality feel, often seen as "budget alternative"Learn direct numbers, differentiate on feel, adaptive fit, health loop

In summary: Be as clear and authoritative as Oura, as punchy as Ultrahuman, as number-straightforward as RingConn, and then use your own unique selling points to say your own thing. This is a summary of the copy styles, not a direct quote; before external comparison, verify against competitors' current website copy.

12. Brand Facts and Data Standards

External numbers must come only from the brand's profile; do not fabricate:

  • Terminology, specs, evidence, pricing standards are uniformly recorded in the brand profile (template at references/brand-profile-template.md)
  • Brand-specific profiles are not distributed with the public repository (trade secrets): CIRCUL 3 product specs, terminology, and standard phrasing exist in the team's private knowledge base. If you see brand-circul-3.md in your local references/ directory (private package only), read it before writing CIRCUL copy; facts in that file take precedence
  • When facts from the user are missing: ask first; if unconfirmable, label as To Be Confirmed and do not include in the final draft
  • Items marked "To Be Confirmed" (accuracy, battery life calculation method, color count, etc.) shall not enter the final copy

13. References

FileContentWhen to Read
references/guideline.mdFull Guideline: brand methodology, competitor tone, complete banned list, complete use-with-caution list (medical / data standards / competitor comparison / testimonials), complete vocabulary tiering and translation examplesBefore writing; when encountering a claim you're unsure about
references/scoring-card.mdFull Quick Score Card: calibration examples, complete diagnostic examples, 10-second pre-publication self-checkWhen scoring, doing batch checks
references/revision-playbook.md10 Revision Rules: claims vs. facts, terminology management, verb management, nominalization breakdown, syntax flow, redundancy self-elimination, numbers first, causal proofreading, compliance tone, headline naming + three body text review questionsWhen reviewing, revising, self-checking
references/brand-circul-3.md (private package only)CIRCUL 3 brand fact benchmark: product specs, terminology list, approved standard sentences, writing red lines, to-be-confirmed listRead if the file exists, before writing CIRCUL copy; the public repository does not contain this file
references/brand-profile-template.mdBrand data standards table / differentiation pillars / video shot list templateWhen onboarding a new brand

Pre-publication self-check (full version in references/scoring-card.md §17): Instantly understandable / One selling point / Has hard information / Information remains after removing rhetoric / Not generic after competitor swap / Each word passes the deletion test / No engineer words / No banned words and use-with-caution words have evidence / Subheading doesn't repeat headline / Video caption doesn't block UI.

Related Skills