一款AI驱动的代码库安全扫描器，像安全研究员一样推理代码 — 追踪数据流、理解组件交互、捕捉模式匹配工具遗漏的漏洞。用于扫描代码安全漏洞、查找Bug、检查SQL注入、XSS、命令注入、暴露的API密钥、硬编码密钥、不安全的依赖项、访问控制问题，或任何类似“我的代码安全吗？”、“审查安全问题”、“审计此代码库”或“检查漏洞”的请求。涵盖注入缺陷、身份验证和访问控制漏洞、密钥暴露、弱密码学、不安全的依赖项以及JavaScript、TypeScript、Python、Java、PHP、Go、Ruby和Rust中的业务逻辑问题。
github/security-review 是一款基于AI的代码库安全扫描技能，它模拟安全研究员的思维过程，通过追踪数据流和理解组件交互来发现传统模式匹配工具难以捕捉的漏洞。该技能适用于多种场景，包括扫描SQL注入、XSS、命令注入、暴露的API密钥、硬编码密钥、不安全的依赖项以及访问控制问题，常用于回答“代码安全吗？”、“审查安全问题”、“审计代码库”或“检查漏洞”等请求。它支持JavaScript、TypeScript、Python、Java、PHP、Go、Ruby和Rust等主流编程语言，覆盖注入缺陷、身份验证和访问控制漏洞、密钥暴露、弱密码学以及业务逻辑问题。技能的核心机制是通过深入分析代码上下文和安全研究人员常用的模式来提供精准的安全评估，从而帮助开发者主动发现并修复潜在威胁。
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/tree/main/skills/security-reviewInstalled? Explore more 研究与数据分析 skills: affaan-m/uspto-database, affaan-m/scholar-evaluation, affaan-m/literature-review · View all 6 →
AI驱动的代码库安全扫描器，像安全研究员一样推理代码 — 追踪数据流、理解组件交互、捕捉模式匹配工具遗漏的漏洞。使用此技能扫描代码安全漏洞、查找Bug、检查SQL注入、XSS、命令注入、暴露的API密钥、硬编码密钥、不安全的依赖项、访问控制问题，或任何类似“我的代码安全吗？”、“审查安全问题”、“审计此代码库”或“检查漏洞”的请求。涵盖注入缺陷、身份验证和访问控制漏洞、密钥暴露、弱密码学、不安全的依赖项以及JavaScript、TypeScript、Python、Java、PHP、Go、Ruby和Rust中的业务逻辑问题。
This repo contains 20 individual skills — each has its own dedicated page.
Use this skill when the user explicitly asks to map, document, or onboard into an existing codebase. Trigger for prompts like "map this codebase", "document this architecture", "onboard me to this repo", or "create codebase docs". Do not trigger for routine feature implementation, bug fixes, or narrow code edits unless the user asks for repository-level discovery.
Add educational comments to the file specified, or prompt asking for file to comment if one is not provided.
Patterns and techniques for adding governance, safety, and trust controls to AI agent systems. Use this skill when: - Building AI agents that call external tools (APIs, databases, file systems) - Implementing policy-based access controls for agent tool usage - Adding semantic intent classification to detect dangerous prompts - Creating trust scoring systems for multi-agent workflows - Building audit trails for agent actions and decisions - Enforcing rate limits, content filters, or tool restrictions on agents - Working with any agent framework (PydanticAI, CrewAI, OpenAI Agents, LangChain, AutoGen)
Patterns and techniques for evaluating and improving AI agent outputs. Use this skill when: - Implementing self-critique and reflection loops - Building evaluator-optimizer pipelines for quality-critical generation - Creating test-driven code refinement workflows - Designing rubric-based or LLM-as-judge evaluation systems - Adding iterative improvement to agent outputs (code, reports, analysis) - Measuring and improving agent response quality
Check any AI agent codebase against the OWASP Agentic Security Initiative (ASI) Top 10 risks. Use this skill when: - Evaluating an agent system's security posture before production deployment - Running a compliance check against OWASP ASI 2026 standards - Mapping existing security controls to the 10 agentic risks - Generating a compliance report for security review or audit - Comparing agent framework security features against the standard - Any request like "is my agent OWASP compliant?", "check ASI compliance", or "agentic security audit"
Comprehensive AI prompt engineering safety review and improvement prompt. Analyzes prompts for safety, bias, security vulnerabilities, and effectiveness while providing detailed improvement recommendations with extensive frameworks, testing methodologies, and educational content.
Instrument a webapp to send useful telemetry data to Azure App Insights
Serves as a reviewer of the codebase with instructions on looking for Apple App Store optimizations or rejection reasons.
Comprehensive project architecture blueprint generator that analyzes codebases to create detailed architectural documentation. Automatically detects technology stacks and architectural patterns, generates visual diagrams, documents implementation patterns, and provides extensible blueprints for maintaining architectural consistency and guiding new development.
Triage and resolve Arch Linux issues with pacman, systemd, and rolling-release best practices.
Creates, reads, updates, and deletes Arize AI integrations that store LLM provider credentials used by evaluators and other Arize features. Supports any LLM provider (e.g. OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure OpenAI, AWS Bedrock, Vertex AI, Gemini, NVIDIA NIM). Use when the user mentions AI integration, LLM provider credentials, create integration, list integrations, update credentials, delete integration, or connecting an LLM provider to Arize.
Creates and manages annotation configs (categorical, continuous, freeform label schemas) and annotation queues (human review workflows) on Arize. Applies human annotations to project spans via the Python SDK. Use when the user mentions annotation config, annotation queue, label schema, human feedback, bulk annotate spans, update_annotations, labeling queue, annotate record, or human review.
Creates, manages, and queries Arize datasets and examples. Covers dataset CRUD, appending examples, exporting data, and file-based dataset creation using the ax CLI. Use when the user needs test data, evaluation examples, or mentions create dataset, list datasets, export dataset, append examples, dataset version, golden dataset, or test set.
Handles LLM-as-judge evaluation workflows on Arize including creating/updating evaluators, running evaluations on spans or experiments, managing tasks, trigger-run operations, column mapping, and continuous monitoring. Use when the user mentions create evaluator, LLM judge, hallucination, faithfulness, correctness, relevance, run eval, score spans, score experiment, trigger-run, column mapping, continuous monitoring, or improve evaluator prompt.
Creates, runs, and analyzes Arize experiments for evaluating and comparing model performance. Covers experiment CRUD, exporting runs, comparing results, and evaluation workflows using the ax CLI. Use when the user mentions create experiment, run experiment, compare models, model performance, evaluate AI, experiment results, benchmark, A/B test models, or measure accuracy.
Adds Arize AX tracing to an LLM application for the first time. Follows a two-phase agent-assisted flow to analyze the codebase then implement instrumentation after user confirmation. Use when the user wants to instrument their app, add tracing from scratch, set up LLM observability, integrate OpenTelemetry or openinference, or get started with Arize tracing.
Generates deep links to the Arize UI for traces, spans, sessions, datasets, labeling queues, evaluators, and annotation configs. Produces clickable URLs for sharing Arize resources with team members. Use when the user wants to link to or open a trace, span, session, dataset, evaluator, or annotation config in the Arize UI.
Optimizes, improves, and debugs LLM prompts using production trace data, evaluations, and annotations. Extracts prompts from spans, gathers performance signal, and runs a data-driven optimization loop using the ax CLI. Use when the user mentions optimize prompt, improve prompt, make AI respond better, improve output quality, prompt engineering, prompt tuning, or system prompt improvement.
Downloads, exports, and inspects existing Arize traces and spans to understand what an LLM app is doing or debug runtime issues. Covers exporting traces by ID, spans by ID, sessions by ID, and root-cause investigation using the ax CLI. Use when the user wants to look at existing trace data, see what their LLM app is doing, export traces, download spans, investigate errors, or analyze behavior regressions.
Aspire skill covering the Aspire CLI, AppHost orchestration, service discovery, integrations, MCP server, VS Code extension, Dev Containers, GitHub Codespaces, templates, dashboard, and deployment. Use when the user asks to create, run, debug, configure, deploy, or troubleshoot an Aspire distributed application.
USPTO patent and trademark data workflow for official record lookup, PatentSearch queries, TSDR checks, assignment data, and reproducible IP research logs.
Structured scholarly-work evaluation for papers, proposals, literature reviews, methods sections, evidence quality, citation support, and research-writing feedback.
Systematic literature-review workflow for academic, biomedical, technical, and scientific topics, including search planning, source screening, synthesis, citation checks, and evidence logging.
The agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond.
Agent skill repository discovered by 10x-chat research.
Review backend code for quality, security, maintainability, and best practices based on established checklist rules. Use when the user requests a review, analysis, or improvement of backend files (e.g., `.py`) under the `api/` directory. Do NOT use for frontend files (e.g., `.tsx`, `.ts`, `.js`). Supports pending-change review, code snippets review, and file-focused review.