Communitygithub.com

techygarg/lattice

Install engineering discipline into any AI coding assistant. Composable skills for design, implementation, review, and team standards. Better process, not just better prompts.

lattice란 무엇인가요?

lattice is a Claude Code agent skill that install engineering discipline into any AI coding assistant. Composable skills for design, implementation, review, and team standards. Better process, not just better prompts.

지원 대상Claude Code~Codex CLI~Cursor
npx skills add techygarg/lattice

즐겨 사용하는 AI에게 물어보기

이 에이전트 스킬이 미리 로드된 새 채팅을 엽니다.

문서

Lattice Sync

Core responsibility: Keep every public-facing document in sync with the actual skill inventory. The skills directory is the source of truth — all documents derive from it.

Input: None required. Reads the live state of skills/ and all documentation on every run. Optionally: a specific skill name or tier to focus the audit.

Output:

  • A findings report listing every gap as [GAP], [STALE], or [WRONG] with file and description
  • All found gaps fixed in-place across: README.md, docs/how-it-works.md, docs/configuration.md, docs/practical-guide.md, PROJECT.md, CLAUDE.md, .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml
  • A final clean confirmation: "No gaps found" or a list of what was changed

How to verify this skill did its job:

grep -rn "requirements atom\|framework:requirements\b" \
  docs/ README.md PROJECT.md CLAUDE.md .github/ skills/ \
  --include="*.md" --include="*.yml"

Any result from this grep means the sync is incomplete. A clean run returns no output.

Also verify: every skill in skills/ appears in the bug_report.yml dropdown and the how-it-works.md inventory tables.

When to run

  • After creating any new atom, molecule, or refiner
  • After renaming or removing a skill
  • After changing a skill's config key, consumed-by relationships, or output path
  • When a user suspects docs are out of date

Phase 1 — Build the live inventory

Read the skills directory tree. STOP: do NOT assume you already know the inventory — always read from files.

find skills/ -name "SKILL.md" | sort

For each SKILL.md found, extract:

  • name: field (frontmatter)
  • tier: inferred from path (atoms/, molecules/, refiners/)
  • Config key: grep for paths\.\w+ in the file
  • Consumes: grep for framework: references (molecules only)
  • Produces: grep for .lattice/standards/ path (refiners only)
  • Output subfolder: grep for .lattice/\w+/ paths (molecules only)

Build a structured inventory:

atoms:    [name, config_key, has_refiner, has_defaults_md]
molecules: [name, composes[], output_subfolder]
refiners:  [name, config_key, produces_path, consumed_by_atom]

Read references/audit-checklist.md for the complete per-document audit rules before starting Phase 2.


Phase 2 — Audit each document

Work through every document in this order. For each, apply the checks in references/audit-checklist.md. STOP: a document with zero findings gets no entry in the report — do not print a heading or a "no gaps" line for it. Log every finding as:

[GAP]    file:line — description of what is missing or wrong
[STALE]  file:line — description of what refers to something that no longer exists
[WRONG]  file:line — description of a relationship (consumed-by, produces) that is incorrect

Documents to audit:

  1. docs/how-it-works.md
  2. docs/configuration.md
  3. docs/practical-guide.md
  4. README.md
  5. PROJECT.md — Skill Conventions, Known subfolders list, and Repository Structure counts all live here
  6. .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml
  7. .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/skill_request.yml (generic — only check if skill-specific examples are present)
  8. .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/documentation.yml (generic — only check if skill names appear)
  9. knowledge-base/requirement-forge-requirements.md (if exists — check it matches current skill names)

Present a consolidated findings report before making any changes:

## Lattice Sync — Findings

### docs/how-it-works.md
[GAP] Atoms table missing: requirement-quality
[STALE] Refiners in Depth: requirement-forge-refiner consumed-by says "molecule" but should say "requirement-quality atom"

### .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.yml
[GAP] Skill dropdown missing: requirement-quality (atom)

Total: N gaps, M stale references, P wrong relationships

Ask: "Ready to apply all fixes? Or are there any findings you want to skip?"


Phase 3 — Fix

Apply every agreed fix. For each document, make all changes in a single edit pass. STOP: do not make multiple passes over the same file.

After all fixes are applied, run one final verification grep to confirm no old references remain:

# Check for stale atom names or wrong consumed-by text
grep -rn "<old-name>\|consumed.*molecule\|consumed.*wrong" \
  docs/ README.md PROJECT.md CLAUDE.md .github/ --include="*.md" --include="*.yml"

If the grep returns results, fix them before declaring done.


Phase 4 — Deploy (optional)

If the user wants to push the updated skills to their AI tool's skills directory:

./tools/install.sh /path/to/your/skills/folder

Ask the user for the target path if not provided. Default for Claude Code: ~/.claude/skills/.


Key relationships to always verify

The most error-prone relationship in Lattice documentation is the refiner → atom → molecule chain. Documents frequently drift to say a refiner is "consumed by the molecule" when it's actually consumed by an atom that the molecule composes.

For every refiner in the live inventory, derive the correct relationship dynamically:

  1. Read the refiner's SKILL.md — find which atom it says consumes it (look for "consumed by" or "reads this document")
  2. Read that atom's Config Resolution — confirm it reads the same paths.{key}
  3. Read the molecule that composes that atom — confirm the chain is complete
  4. If any document says the refiner is consumed by the molecule directly (not the atom), flag [WRONG]

Exception: review-refiner is consumed by the review molecule directly — it configures the molecule's workflow, not an atom. This is the only correct molecule-direct consumption in the current framework.


Known .lattice/ subfolders

Every molecule that writes living documents must use a named subfolder. If a new molecule is found that writes to .lattice/ and its subfolder is not in this list, flag it for addition to PROJECT.md:

  • standards/ — refiner outputs
  • context/ — feature anchor docs (context-anchoring atom)
  • learnings/ — operational learnings (learning-harvest atom)
  • reviews/ — review log
  • insights/ — architecture-compass output
  • requirements/ — epic/feature specs (requirement-forge)

What good looks like

The sync is complete when:

  • Every skill in skills/ appears in the docs/how-it-works.md inventory tables
  • Every refiner has a correct entry in docs/configuration.md paths table with the right consumed-by atom
  • Every molecule appears in bug_report.yml skill dropdown
  • Every atom appears in bug_report.yml skill dropdown
  • Every refiner appears in bug_report.yml skill dropdown
  • PROJECT.md known subfolders list covers every .lattice/ output directory
  • No document contains a skill name that no longer exists in skills/
  • The pipeline descriptions in README.md and docs/how-it-works.md use current molecule names in the right order
  • Every molecule that hardcodes its own refiner list (refiners-update's map table, lattice-init's Step 3 priority list) has one entry per live refiner in skills/refiners/ — no missing, no stale

See references/audit-checklist.md for the exhaustive per-document rules.

관련 스킬