kevin-burns/transcribe-summarize

Que fait transcribe-summarize ?

Audio in, a transcript out, and optionally a set of meeting notes. The default path runs entirely on the user's machine.

Two things make this different from calling Whisper yourself, and both came out of a day of measurement rather than design:

1. Whisper invents speech over silence, and a bigger model does not help. On a real call with 40 s of joining silence, large-v3 produced an 18-second segment of one word repeated 55 times. This skill filters those out and keeps them, with the metrics that rejected them, in a sidecar so the decision is auditable.
2. Cleaning the audio beats choosing a model. Normalising and silence-trimming took invented segments from 2 to 0 and fixed a word both large-v3 and turbo had wrong. It is on by default.

Setup

ffmpeg and ffprobe must be on PATH — macOS brew install ffmpeg, Windows winget install Gyan.FFmpeg, Linux apt install ffmpeg.

Everything else is stdlib. The backend brings its own library, and only the one selected, so pick it with uv run --with:

backend	platform	--with spec
mlx-whisper — default on Apple Silicon	macOS arm64 only	'mlx-whisper>=0.4.2'
faster-whisper — default elsewhere	mac / Windows / Linux	'faster-whisper>=1.2'
parakeet — opt-in	Apple Silicon verified	'parakeet-mlx'
groq, openai, elevenlabs, gemini — opt-in, network	any	nothing to install

If the library is missing, the error prints the exact command. Don't guess it.

Run it

Declare the helper at the top of every command block — shell state does not persist between tool calls:

ts() {
  UV="$(command -v uv || ls "$HOME/.local/bin/uv" "$HOME/.cargo/bin/uv" \
        /opt/homebrew/bin/uv /usr/local/bin/uv 2>/dev/null | head -1)"
  "$UV" run --with "$1" --script "$HOME/.claude/skills/transcribe-summarize/scripts/transcribe.py" "${@:2}"
}

# Apple Silicon
ts 'mlx-whisper>=0.4.2' meeting.m4a

# Windows / Linux
ts 'faster-whisper>=1.2' meeting.m4a --backend faster-whisper

# Bias the decoder toward known jargon, and fix a name it always gets wrong
ts 'mlx-whisper>=0.4.2' meeting.m4a --prompt 'Terragrunt, EKS' --replace 'north wind=Northwind'

Use the absolute path. A relative one only resolves if the cwd happens to be the skill directory.

Output contract

<outdir>/
  <stem>.md                    the transcript, with [hh:mm:ss] anchors
  <stem>-artifacts/
      <stem>.srt               subtitles
      <stem>.json              every segment, including the suppressed ones
      <stem>.run.json          backend, model, trim offsets, guard tally

--json prints those paths to stdout as JSON. Report absolute paths to the user; a file they have to hunt for is not a deliverable.

Timestamps are on the original recording's clock. Trimming shortens the audio during decoding, and the offsets are mapped back before anything is written, so the .srt lines up with the user's own file.

The network rule — state it, then obey it

A network backend is reachable only when the user asks for it in that invocation. Never as a fallback, never after a local backend fails, never because it would be faster. --backend auto cannot reach one; there is no code path.

Before anything is sent, the tool prints provider, endpoint, file size, duration and estimated cost, then waits. Use --dry-run to show the user that block before committing. In a non-interactive session an unconfirmed upload is refused.

Keys come from the environment, one variable per backend, and nowhere else. Never accept one as a flag, never echo one, never write one into a file.

backend	key	model	$/hour	diarizes
groq	GROQ_API_KEY	whisper-large-v3-turbo	0.04	no
groq	GROQ_API_KEY	whisper-large-v3 (default)	0.111	no
elevenlabs	ELEVENLABS_API_KEY	scribe_v2	0.22	up to 32
gemini	GEMINI_API_KEY	gemini-3.5-transcribe	0.306	up to 3
openai	OPENAI_API_KEY	whisper-1	0.36	no

--backend gemini — the two things to say before running it

ts '' /path/to/audio.m4a --backend gemini --dry-run     # show the block, send nothing
ts '' /path/to/audio.m4a --backend gemini               # then run it

Nothing to install — it is stdlib http.client, so the --with argument is empty. Two facts belong in the sentence you say to the user before running it, because neither is visible from the command line:

• The audio is uploaded twice over. Gemini has no single-shot endpoint: the file goes to Google's Files API first, and the transcription request then carries only the URI that came back. Google keeps that upload for 48 hours. The disclosure block prints this; do not skip past it.
• 30 minutes is the ceiling, not the hour Google's own page leads with. The hour applies only without word timestamps or diarization, and this backend always requests both — without word offsets there is no clock to map back onto the user's file. A longer recording is refused before the upload starts.

Do not offer Gemini's smart mode. It is not wired up, on purpose. If the user asks for it — it is the model's headline feature, and it does remove filler words and rewrite spoken self-corrections — the answer is that Google's API refuses word timestamps and speaker labels alongside it, so it would produce no .srt and no speakers, and it changes the words. Filler removal happens at the notes step instead, where it is labelled a summary and checked. See references/backends.md.

The quality guard

On by default. Suppressed segments stay in the .json with the reason and the metrics; they are dropped from the .md and .srt. --guard mark keeps them inline flagged, --guard off disables it.

It does not transfer to every backend. The strong rules read Whisper decoder metrics. faster-whisper, Groq and OpenAI return all three, so the guard is the same code. Parakeet, ElevenLabs and Gemini return none of them and fall back to the backend-independent rules only — the tool says so at run time. See references/backends.md.

If the user asks why a stretch of transcript is missing, read the .json: the answer is there with the numbers that caused it.

Starting from a transcript you already have

Most meetings are already transcribed by the platform, and there is often no audio at all. Teams and Zoom hand out a .vtt (sometimes .srt), and it is unreadable as prose: a cue every few seconds, sentences chopped across cues, the speaker's name repeated on every line, timecodes throughout.

That is a supported entry point. Nothing is re-transcribed — the audio path is skipped entirely:

"$HOME/.claude/skills/transcribe-summarize/scripts/normalise_transcript.py" meeting.vtt
# -> meeting.md, cues rejoined into paragraphs, speakers attributed, one anchor per paragraph

Then carry on exactly as if the transcript had been decoded here: read it, ask for the meeting facts, and write the notes under references/notes-register.md.

--no-speakers drops attribution if the source labels are wrong or unwanted.

It is a format conversion and nothing more. No words are changed, no filler removed, no grammar fixed. Deciding what was said is the summarising step and it has its own rules. If a user hands you a messy transcript and asks for it "tidied up", normalise the format here and do the judgement in the notes — do not quietly rewrite someone's words in a document that is supposed to record them.

Speakers are kept in the transcript and forbidden in the notes, which is not a contradiction: a transcript is a working artefact and may carry provenance; the notes are a record and may not. notes_check.py will still reject a raw Speaker 2 label in the notes.

If someone passes a .vtt to transcribe.py it stops and points here rather than trying to decode it.

Video files

.mp4 is what a Teams or Zoom download actually is, and it works directly — no need to extract the audio first. Verified working: .mp4, .mov, .mkv, .webm, plus every audio container (.m4a, .mp3, .wav, .flac, .opus). ffmpeg pulls the audio track out; the video is ignored and never uploaded.

A file with no audio track — a muted screen recording — is refused up front, before any network backend is offered it. That check runs before the egress gate specifically so a silent video is never uploaded and billed.

Review is a step, not an optional extra

Transcription output is a draft. Say so, and make the user check it.

Machine transcription is confidently wrong in ways no threshold catches. Measured on real audio in this project: large-v3 silently dropped a speaker's spoken correction of a figure, and every backend heard "board pack" as "board packs up". Both read perfectly fluently. The quality guard catches inventions over silence; it cannot catch a plausible mis-hearing, and neither can you by reading the output.

So the workflow is transcribe → the user checks → then notes:

1. The transcript .md ends with a "Worth checking" section — ranked timestamps where a listen-back is most likely to pay off (least-confident segments, anything containing figures). Point the user at it explicitly.
2. Names, figures and dates are what to verify. They are the first thing to degrade and the most expensive to get wrong in a record.
3. Fixes go into the .md, by hand or with --replace on a re-run. Then regenerate anything built from it.

Never present a transcript or a set of notes as verified. You did not hear the audio; the user did. Say what was decoded, say where it is least certain, and let them confirm.

Editing and regenerating

The .md is the source. Edit it, then rebuild the PDF — no re-transcription:

"$HOME/.claude/skills/transcribe-summarize/scripts/notes_check.py" notes.md
"$HOME/.claude/skills/transcribe-summarize/scripts/render_pdf.py"  notes.md

Run the checker again after any edit. Hand-editing is exactly when a provenance leak or an inferred "next steps" line gets introduced.

Writing the notes

When the user wants meeting notes rather than a transcript, you write them — read the transcript and produce the document yourself. There is a scripts/summarize.py fallback that calls a network model, but it is for running this pipeline outside a Claude Code session; inside one it is a pointless upload.

Ask first — three things the audio cannot tell you

Almost no backend here identifies speakers. Every Whisper engine and Parakeet return no speaker field at all. Two exceptions: --backend elevenlabs (Scribe) diarizes up to 32 speakers, and --backend gemini up to 3. Both return positional labels rather than names — speaker_0 and spk:0 respectively, the formats measured from live responses on 2026-09-04 and 2026-09-06 — and the register forbids a raw label in a notes document, in either format. So they tell you how many people spoke and which lines belong together; they still cannot tell you who. Attribution comes from the user either way; diarization just makes the mapping possible from the transcript instead of from memory.

Before writing notes, ask for:

1. Who was present. Without names, write the notes with no attribution at all — impersonal, "it was stated that…". Never invent a name, a role, or a positional label. If the transcript makes it obvious who spoke (someone is addressed by name), you may attribute that; ambiguity means no name.
2. The date of the meeting. Today's date is a default, not a fact. Audio is often written up days after the conversation, and a wrong date on a factual record is worse than no date. Confirm it.
3. What the meeting was — a title in the participants' own terms.

Ask for all three in one message, not one at a time, and offer today's date as the default so the user only has to correct it. If the user declines to supply attendees, proceed unattributed and say that is what you did.

Before writing a single line, read references/notes-register.md. It is short and it is the whole specification. It is not style advice; the rules in it were learned by having sections deleted by hand from a real document, and the reasons are legal rather than aesthetic.

The two rules it turns on:

• Factual summary only. What was said. No analysis, no implications, no "next steps", no "what wasn't covered", no filling a gap.
• It reads as a protocol write-up by someone who was there. It never mentions a recording, a transcript, audio, a model, or any decoder artefact — no timecodes, no Speaker 2 labels.

Then check it, every time — the register is not self-enforcing and a model asked to summarise will add analysis unprompted:

"$HOME/.claude/skills/transcribe-summarize/scripts/notes_check.py" notes.md

Exit 0 is clean; exit 1 lists file:line for every violation. Fix them before handing the document over. Run it on the PDF too — a leak that only exists in the rendered file still counts.

Guidance is welcome, but after the notes and outside the document. Offer your read in conversation, or write it to a separate file. Never append it.

The PDF

"$HOME/.claude/skills/transcribe-summarize/scripts/render_pdf.py" notes.md

Headless Chrome, Chromium or Edge, discovered automatically. If none is installed it writes the HTML, says so, and exits 0 — the HTML is still a deliverable.

Provenance

Local decoding is mlx-whisper (MLX) or faster-whisper (CTranslate2); audio preparation is ffmpeg. The network backends call Groq's and OpenAI's transcription endpoints directly over stdlib urllib — no vendor SDK.

Keeping provenance out of a notes document changes what the document says, not what happened. Recording a call without consent is a criminal offence in some jurisdictions — in Germany, StGB §201 — and a well-registered write-up is not a defence to it. Obtaining consent is the user's responsibility, and if the question comes up, say so plainly rather than implying the framing provides cover.

Tooling

Unit tests in tests/, an offline eval in evals/. Fixtures are generated by fixtures/make_fixtures.py, never committed — this repository is public and audio never belongs in it.