CommunityProgramación y desarrollogithub.com

viictiiyo-dev/tiktok-bridge

Quick spec generation with interactive or automatic mode

¿Qué es tiktok-bridge?

tiktok-bridge is a Claude Code agent skill that quick spec generation with interactive or automatic mode.

Compatible con~Claude Code~Codex CLI~Cursor
npx skills add https://github.com/viictiiyo-dev/tiktok-bridge/tree/HEAD/.opencode/skills/kiro-spec-quick

Installed? Explore more Programación y desarrollo skills: steipete/bluebubbles, steipete/eightctl, steipete/blucli · View all 6 →

Preguntar en tu IA favorita

Abre un nuevo chat con esta habilidad de agente ya precargada.

Documentación

Quick Spec Generator

If --auto flag is present in $ARGUMENTS, you are in AUTOMATIC MODE.

In Automatic Mode:

  • Execute ALL 4 phases in a continuous loop without stopping
  • Display progress after each phase (e.g., "Phase 1/4 complete: spec initialized")
  • IGNORE any "Next Step" messages from Phase 2-4 (they are for standalone usage)
  • After Phase 4, run the final sanity review before exiting
  • Stop ONLY after the sanity review completes or if error occurs

Core Task

Execute 4 spec phases sequentially. In automatic mode, execute all phases without stopping. In interactive mode, prompt user for approval between phases.

Before claiming quick generation is complete, run one lightweight sanity review over the generated requirements, design, and tasks. If the host supports fresh sub-agents, use one. Otherwise run the sanity review inline.

Execution Steps

Step 1: Parse Arguments and Initialize

Parse $ARGUMENTS:

  • If contains --auto: Automatic Mode (execute all 4 phases)
  • Otherwise: Interactive Mode (prompt at each phase)
  • Extract description (remove --auto flag if present)

Example:

"User profile with avatar upload --auto" → mode=automatic, description="User profile with avatar upload"
"User profile feature" → mode=interactive, description="User profile feature"

Display mode banner and proceed to Step 2.

Step 2: Execute Phase Loop

Execute these 4 phases in order:


Phase 1: Initialize Spec (Direct Implementation)

Core Logic:

  1. Check for Brief:

    • If .kiro/specs/{feature-name}/brief.md exists (created by /kiro-discovery), read it for discovery context (problem, approach, scope, constraints)
    • Use brief content as the project description instead of $ARGUMENTS
  2. Generate Feature Name:

    • Convert description to kebab-case
    • Example: "User profile with avatar upload" → "user-profile-avatar-upload"
    • Keep name concise (2-4 words ideally)
  3. Check Uniqueness:

    • Use Glob to check .kiro/specs/*/
    • If directory exists with only brief.md (no spec.json), use that directory (discovery created it)
    • Otherwise if feature name exists, append -2, -3, etc.
  4. Create Directory:

    • Use Bash: mkdir -p .kiro/specs/{feature-name} (skip if already exists from discovery)
  5. Initialize Files from Templates:

    a. Read templates:

    - .kiro/settings/templates/specs/init.json
    - .kiro/settings/templates/specs/requirements-init.md
    

    b. Replace placeholders:

    {{FEATURE_NAME}} → feature-name
    {{TIMESTAMP}} → current ISO 8601 timestamp (use `date -u +"%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ"`)
    {{PROJECT_DESCRIPTION}} → description
    es → language code (detect from user's input language, default to `en`)
    

    c. Write files using Write tool:

    - .kiro/specs/{feature-name}/spec.json
    - .kiro/specs/{feature-name}/requirements.md
    
  6. Output Progress: "Phase 1/4 complete: Spec initialized at .kiro/specs/{feature-name}/"

Automatic Mode: IMMEDIATELY continue to Phase 2.

Interactive Mode: Prompt "Continue to requirements generation? (yes/no)"

  • If "no": Stop, show current state
  • If "yes": Continue to Phase 2

Phase 2: Generate Requirements

Invoke /kiro-spec-requirements {feature-name}.

Wait for completion. IGNORE any "Next Step" message (it is for standalone usage).

Output Progress: "Phase 2/4 complete: Requirements generated"

Automatic Mode: IMMEDIATELY continue to Phase 3.

Interactive Mode: Prompt "Continue to design generation? (yes/no)"

  • If "no": Stop, show current state
  • If "yes": Continue to Phase 3

Phase 3: Generate Design

Invoke /kiro-spec-design {feature-name} -y. The -y flag auto-approves requirements.

Wait for completion. IGNORE any "Next Step" message.

Output Progress: "Phase 3/4 complete: Design generated"

Automatic Mode: IMMEDIATELY continue to Phase 4.

Interactive Mode: Prompt "Continue to tasks generation? (yes/no)"

  • If "no": Stop, show current state
  • If "yes": Continue to Phase 4

Phase 4: Generate Tasks

Invoke /kiro-spec-tasks {feature-name} -y. The -y flag auto-approves requirements, design, and tasks.

Wait for completion.

Output Progress: "Phase 4/4 complete: Tasks generated"

Final Sanity Review

After Phase 4, run a lightweight sanity review before claiming completion.

  • Review requirements.md, design.md, and tasks.md directly from disk. If brief.md exists, use it only as supporting context.
  • Prefer a fresh review sub-agent when the host supports it. Pass only file paths and the review objective; the reviewer should read the generated files itself.
  • Review focus:
    • Do requirements, design, and tasks tell a coherent story?
    • Are there obvious contradictions, missing prerequisites, or missing task coverage for required design work?
    • Are _Depends:_, _Boundary:_, and (P) markers plausible for implementation?
  • If the review finds only task-plan-local issues, repair or update the generated tasks.md once, then re-run the sanity review.
  • If the review finds a real requirements/design gap or contradiction, stop and report follow-up instead of claiming the quick spec is implementation-ready.

All 4 phases plus sanity review complete.

Output final completion summary (see Output Description section) and exit.


Important Constraints

Error Handling

  • Any phase failure stops the workflow
  • Display error and current state
  • Suggest manual recovery command

Output Description

Mode Banners

Interactive Mode:

Quick Spec Generation (Interactive Mode)

You will be prompted at each phase.
Note: Skips gap analysis and design validation.

Automatic Mode:

Quick Spec Generation (Automatic Mode)

All phases execute automatically without prompts.
Note: Skips optional validations (gap analysis, design review) and user approval prompts. Internal review gates still run.
Final sanity review still runs.

Intermediate Output

After each phase, show brief progress:

Spec initialized at .kiro/specs/{feature}/
Requirements generated → Continuing to design...
Design generated → Continuing to tasks...

Final Completion Summary

Provide output in the language specified in spec.json:

Quick Spec Generation Complete!

## Generated Files:
- .kiro/specs/{feature}/spec.json
- .kiro/specs/{feature}/requirements.md ({X} requirements)
- .kiro/specs/{feature}/design.md ({Y} components, {Z} endpoints)
- .kiro/specs/{feature}/tasks.md ({N} tasks)

Quick generation skipped:
- `/kiro-validate-gap` - Gap analysis (integration check)
- `/kiro-validate-design` - Design review (architecture validation)

Sanity review: PASSED | FOLLOW-UP REQUIRED

## Next Steps:
1. Review generated specs (especially design.md)
2. Optional validation:
   - `/kiro-validate-gap {feature}` - Check integration with existing codebase
   - `/kiro-validate-design {feature}` - Verify architecture quality
3. Start implementation: `/kiro-impl {feature}`

Safety & Fallback

Error Scenarios

Template Missing:

  • Check .kiro/settings/templates/specs/ exists
  • Report specific missing file
  • Exit with error

Directory Creation Failed:

  • Check permissions
  • Report error with path
  • Exit with error

Phase Execution Failed (Phase 2-4):

  • Stop workflow
  • Show current state and completed phases
  • Suggest: "Continue manually from /kiro-spec-{next-phase} {feature}"

Sanity Review Failed:

  • Stop workflow
  • Report the exact contradiction, missing prerequisite, or task-plan issue
  • Suggest targeted follow-up with /kiro-spec-design {feature}, /kiro-spec-tasks {feature}, or manual edits depending on the finding

User Cancellation (Interactive Mode):

  • Stop gracefully
  • Show completed phases
  • Suggest manual continuation

Individual skills in this repo

This repo contains 14 individual skills — each has its own dedicated page.

viictiiyo-dev/tiktok-bridge

Investigate implementation failures using root-cause-first debugging. Use when an implementer is blocked, verification fails, or repeated remediation does not converge.

viictiiyo-dev/tiktok-bridge

Entry point for new work. Determines the best action path or work decomposition (update existing spec, create new spec, mixed decomposition, or no spec needed) and refines ideas through structured dialogue.

viictiiyo-dev/tiktok-bridge

Implement approved tasks using TDD with subagent dispatch. Runs all pending tasks autonomously or selected tasks manually.

viictiiyo-dev/tiktok-bridge

Review a task implementation against approved specs, task boundaries, and verification evidence. Use after an implementer finishes a task, after remediation, or before accepting a task as complete.

viictiiyo-dev/tiktok-bridge

Create complete specs (requirements, design, tasks) for all features in roadmap.md using parallel sub-agent dispatch by dependency wave.

viictiiyo-dev/tiktok-bridge

Create comprehensive technical design for a specification

viictiiyo-dev/tiktok-bridge

Initialize a new specification with detailed project description

viictiiyo-dev/tiktok-bridge

Generate comprehensive requirements for a specification

viictiiyo-dev/tiktok-bridge

Show specification status and progress

viictiiyo-dev/tiktok-bridge

Generate implementation tasks for a specification

viictiiyo-dev/tiktok-bridge

Create custom steering documents for specialized project contexts

viictiiyo-dev/tiktok-bridge

Manage .kiro/steering/ as persistent project knowledge

viictiiyo-dev/tiktok-bridge

Interactive technical design quality review and validation

viictiiyo-dev/tiktok-bridge

Analyze implementation gap between requirements and existing codebase

Skills relacionados