cdcoonce/Portfolio_Website

Project Context Generator

Create or update .claude/docs/project.md — the concise project reference that Claude loads every conversation. Unlike a README (written for humans), project.md is written for Claude: dense, factual, no marketing prose.

Why this skill exists

.claude/docs/project.md is auto-loaded into every Claude conversation via CLAUDE.md. When it's missing or stale, Claude wastes turns re-discovering the tech stack, test commands, and architecture. This skill automates that discovery and produces a tight, accurate reference file.

Workflow

Step 1: Analyze the codebase

Run a structured three-phase analysis to gather project facts. Tag every fact with a confidence level: [confirmed] (read from source), [inferred-high] (strong evidence), [inferred-low] (partial evidence), or [unknown].

See references/analysis-methodology.md for detailed tool actions, glob/grep patterns, and record templates.

Phase 1 — Project Metadata: Glob for package manager files, env templates, CI configs, and toolchain files. Extract: project name, language, Python version, dependencies (with purposes), scripts/commands, environment variables, CI stages, test markers.

Phase 2 — Architecture Scan: Glob for all source files. Identify entry points, build the import graph, classify modules (core/leaf/orchestrator), and identify the architecture pattern. Read config files referenced by source code.

Phase 3 — Data Sources & Infrastructure: Identify external data sources (databases, APIs, files), output targets (files, uploads, APIs), test structure, and custom exception hierarchy.

Step 2: Ask clarifying questions

After analysis, ask the user about [inferred-low] and [unknown] items. Keep it focused — don't ask about things you already know. Common gaps:

• Project purpose: What problem does this solve? (if not obvious from code)
• Data sources: What systems feed data in? What receives output?
• Deployment: How/where is this run? (local, scheduled, cloud)

If the codebase is straightforward, you may only need 1-2 questions — or none.

Step 3: Generate project.md

Write the file using the structure below. If .claude/docs/project.md already exists, confirm with the user before overwriting.

---

Output Structure

The generated project.md must follow this structure. Scale depth to match the project — small projects may skip sections, complex projects may add subsections.

# {Project Name} — Project Context

{One-sentence description: what it is, what it does, key technology.}

## Tech Stack

- **{Language/Runtime}** — {version constraint if known}
- **{Framework}** — {what it's used for}
- **{Key Library}** — {purpose}
- ...bulleted list, bold the tool name, annotate purpose

## Project Layout

```text
{annotated directory tree — one short phrase per entry}
```

Data Flow

{ASCII diagram showing source → transform → output pipeline}

Data Sources

• {SOURCE_NAME} — {what it provides}
• ...for databases, APIs, local files, etc.

Test Markers

• {test command} — {what it runs}
• {marker name} — {what it gates}

Key Architecture Patterns

• {Pattern name} ({file}): {one-sentence explanation}
• ...only non-obvious patterns worth calling out

---

Writing Guidelines

• Dense over verbose. Every line should earn its place. Claude doesn't need motivation or context-setting — just facts.
• Specific over generic. "Run uv run pytest -m 'not snowflake'" beats "Run the tests excluding external dependencies."
• One sentence per pattern. Architecture patterns should be one line each — name, file, explanation.
• Real commands. Copy test commands from pyproject.toml or CI configs, not paraphrased versions.
• Annotate dependencies. Don't just list polars — say polars — high-performance DataFrames.
• Data sources are critical. Claude needs to know what external systems exist. List every database, API, and file source.
• Keep it under 100 lines. If project.md exceeds ~100 lines of content, it's too detailed — move specifics to dedicated docs and link to them.

Output

Save the file as .claude/docs/project.md (create the directory if needed). If the file already exists, show the user a diff summary before overwriting.

After generating project.md, check if CLAUDE.md references it. If not, suggest adding a line like:

See [.claude/docs/project.md](.claude/docs/project.md) for project-specific details (tech stack, architecture, test markers).