Communitygithub.com

haidrrrry/loop-engineering-skills

The missing brain for AI coding agents — verification gates written before the code, Reflexion-style memory that learns from every failure, and self-correction loops with real anchors. One command install for Claude Code; copy-paste prompts for any AI.

Was ist loop-engineering-skills?

loop-engineering-skills is a Claude Code agent skill that the missing brain for AI coding agents — verification gates written before the code, Reflexion-style memory that learns from every failure, and self-correction loops with real anchors. One command install for Claude Code; copy-paste prompts for any AI.

Funktioniert mitClaude Code~Codex CLI~Cursor
npx skills add haidrrrry/loop-engineering-skills

In Ihrer bevorzugten KI fragen

Öffnet einen neuen Chat, in dem dieser Agent-Skill bereits geladen ist.

Dokumentation

Loop Memory

Reflexion-style verbal memory: the agent reflects on each attempt in writing, stores the reflection, and reads recent reflections before acting. Research (Shinn et al., 2023) shows this mechanism — reflect, store, re-read — beats blind retrying by wide margins (+22% on decision tasks over 12 trials, +11% on code) and beats memory-without-reflection by 8 points. The gain comes from written reasons, not from retrying harder.

The protocol

Before acting (every task)

  1. Read .loop/LESSONS.md.
  2. Apply the Standing rules section unconditionally.
  3. Read the 3 most recent entries. If any is relevant to the current task, state in one line how it changes your approach. If none is relevant, proceed — do not force it.

After acting (every attempt, pass or fail)

Append exactly one entry in the file's format:

## [date] — [task, 5 words max] — PASS|FAIL
- What happened: [one line]
- Root cause / why it worked: [one line]
- Next time: [one specific, checkable instruction]

Quality bar for "Next time":

  • ❌ "Be more careful with the database" — not checkable
  • ✅ "Run npx prisma migrate deploy before any seed script" — checkable
  • ❌ "Remember the API is tricky" — vague
  • ✅ "The /users endpoint paginates at 50; always pass ?page= when counting"

Failure reflection, specifically

When an attempt failed, the reflection must answer: what did I believe that was wrong? Failed attempts usually come from a false assumption, not a typo. Name the assumption. That's the lesson.

Maintenance (when the file exceeds ~30 entries)

  1. Read all entries oldest-first.
  2. Any lesson that appears 2+ times graduates into Standing rules, rewritten as a single imperative line.
  3. Delete the oldest 20 entries after graduation.
  4. Never delete Standing rules without the user's approval.

What NOT to store

  • Secrets, keys, tokens, personal data — never, even if they caused the failure.
  • Narration ("I then tried X, after which Y…") — store conclusions only.
  • Duplicate lessons — if it's already there, don't re-add; consider graduating it.
  • Blame or self-criticism — lessons are instructions, not feelings.

Failure modes to avoid

  • Memory theater: writing entries but never reading them. The read step is the value; the write step alone is a diary.
  • Overfitting to one incident: a one-off environment hiccup is not a lesson. If it can't recur, don't record it.
  • Unbounded growth: a 200-entry file no one reads is dead memory. Compress.

Verwandte Skills